IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i13p3478-d380694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operability and Technical Implementation Issues Related to Heat Integration Measures—Interview Study at an Oil Refinery in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Sofie Marton

    (Division of Energy Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Elin Svensson

    (CIT Industriell Energi AB, 412 58 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Simon Harvey

    (Division of Energy Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

In many energy-intensive industrial process plants, significant improvements in energy efficiency can be achieved through increased heat recovery. However, retrofitting plants for heat integration purposes can affect process operability. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive overview of such issues by systematically relating different types of heat recovery retrofit measures to a range of technical barriers associated with process operability and practical implementation of the measures. The paper presents a new approach for this kind of study, which can be applied in the early-stage screening of heat integration retrofit measures. This approach accounts for the importance of a number of selected operability factors and their relative significance. The work was conducted in the form of a case study at a large oil refinery. Several conceptual heat exchanger network retrofit design proposals were prepared and discussed during semi-structured interviews with technical staff at the refinery. The results show that many operability and practical implementation factors, such as spatial limitations, pressure drops and non-energy benefits, influence the opportunities for implementation of different types of heat exchanger network retrofit measures. The results indicate that it is valuable to consider these factors at an early stage when designing candidate heat exchanger network retrofit measures. The interview-based approach developed in this work can be applied to other case studies for further confirmation of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofie Marton & Elin Svensson & Simon Harvey, 2020. "Operability and Technical Implementation Issues Related to Heat Integration Measures—Interview Study at an Oil Refinery in Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3478-:d:380694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hackl, Roman & Harvey, Simon, 2015. "From heat integration targets toward implementation – A TSA (total site analysis)-based design approach for heat recovery systems in industrial clusters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 163-172.
    2. Dieperink, Carel & Brand, Iemy & Vermeulen, Walter, 2004. "Diffusion of energy-saving innovations in industry and the built environment: Dutch studies as inputs for a more integrated analytical framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 773-784, April.
    3. Daniel Leitold & Agnes Vathy-Fogarassy & Janos Abonyi, 2019. "Evaluation of the Complexity, Controllability and Observability of Heat Exchanger Networks Based on Structural Analysis of Network Representations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Bakar, Suraya Hanim Abu & Hamid, Mohd. Kamaruddin Abd. & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul, 2016. "Selection of minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin) for heat exchanger network synthesis based on trade-off plot," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1259-1271.
    5. Zdeněk Jegla & Vít Freisleben, 2020. "Practical Energy Retrofit of Heat Exchanger Network Not Containing Utility Path," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Hür Bütün & Ivan Kantor & François Maréchal, 2019. "Incorporating Location Aspects in Process Integration Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-45, August.
    7. Michael Hiete & Jens Ludwig & Frank Schultmann, 2012. "Intercompany Energy Integration," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(5), pages 689-698, October.
    8. Hür Bütün & Ivan Kantor & François Maréchal, 2019. "An Optimisation Approach for Long-Term Industrial Investment Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    9. Rohdin, Patrik & Thollander, Patrik & Solding, Petter, 2007. "Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 672-677, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelly M. Smith & Stephen Wilson & Paul Lant & Maureen E. Hassall, 2022. "How Do We Learn about Drivers for Industrial Energy Efficiency—Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Hao-Hsuan & Chang, Chuei-Tin & Li, Bao-Hong, 2018. "Game-theory based optimization strategies for stepwise development of indirect interplant heat integration plans," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 90-111.
    2. Ulyev, Leonid & Boldyryev, Stanislav & Kuznetsov, Maxim, 2023. "Investigation of process stream systems for targeting energy-capital trade-offs of a heat recovery network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    3. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Worrell, Ernst, 2013. "Innovation and adoption of energy efficient technologies: An exploratory analysis of Italian primary metal manufacturing SMEs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 430-440.
    4. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    5. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    6. P. Giovani Palafox-Alcantar & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2020. "A Hybrid Methodology to Study Stakeholder Cooperation in Circular Economy Waste Management of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    7. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Hirzel, Simon, 2017. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 240-254.
    8. Elena Stefana & Paola Cocca & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2019. "A Review of Energy and Environmental Management Practices in Cast Iron Foundries to Increase Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Iftikhar Ahmad & Muhammad Salman Arif & Izzat Iqbal Cheema & Patrik Thollander & Masroor Ahmed Khan, 2020. "Drivers and Barriers for Efficient Energy Management Practices in Energy-Intensive Industries: A Case-Study of Iron and Steel Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Jalo, Noor & Johansson, Ida & Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Thollander, Patrik, 2021. "Do energy efficiency networks help reduce barriers to energy efficiency? -A case study of a regional Swedish policy program for industrial SMEs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Virkki-Hatakka, Terhi & Luoranen, Mika & Ikävalko, Markku, 2013. "Differences in perception: How the experts look at energy efficiency (findings from a Finnish survey)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 499-508.
    12. Nahin Tasmin & Shahjadi Hisan Farjana & Md Rashed Hossain & Santu Golder & M. A. Parvez Mahmud, 2022. "Integration of Solar Process Heat in Industries: A Review," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-35, February.
    13. Lawrence, Akvile & Karlsson, Magnus & Nehler, Therese & Thollander, Patrik, 2019. "Effects of monetary investment, payback time and firm characteristics on electricity saving in energy-intensive industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 499-512.
    14. Mahapatra, Krushna & Gustavsson, Leif, 2008. "An adopter-centric approach to analyze the diffusion patterns of innovative residential heating systems in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 577-590, February.
    15. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.
    16. Monjurul Hasan, A S M & Trianni, Andrea & Shukla, Nagesh & Katic, Mile, 2022. "A novel characterization based framework to incorporate industrial energy management services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    17. Zhu, Junming & Chertow, Marian R., 2017. "Business Strategy Under Institutional Constraints: Evidence From China's Energy Efficiency Regulations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 10-21.
    18. Löschel, Andreas & Lutz, Benjamin Johannes & Massier, Philipp, 2017. "Credit constraints, energy management practices, and investments in energy saving technologies: German manufacturing in close-up," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-072, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Joakim Haraldsson & Maria T. Johansson, 2019. "Barriers to and Drivers for Improved Energy Efficiency in the Swedish Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    20. Houda Elmustapha & Thomas Hoppe & Hans Bressers, 2018. "Understanding Stakeholders’ Views and the Influence of the Socio-Cultural Dimension on the Adoption of Solar Energy Technology in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:13:p:3478-:d:380694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.