IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i6p1071-d215518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Using Biogas to Supply the Dual Fuel Diesel Engine of an Agricultural Tractor

Author

Listed:
  • Marlena Owczuk

    (Automotive Industry Institute, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Matuszewska

    (Faculty of Christian Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Stanisław Kruczyński

    (Motor Transport Institute, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Wojciech Kamela

    (Faculty of Automotive and Construction Machinery Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

It is known that biogas without prior purification to biomethane is a commonly used fuel only for the stationary internal combustion engines but not for vehicle engines. The current study evaluates the use of biogas without its prior upgrading to biomethane as fuel for tractor engines. The following tests were carried out: biochemical methane potential tests, dynamometer engine tests, and field tests with the use of a tractor. The average methane content in biogas obtained from vegetable wastes exceeded 60%. The tests performed on the engine dynamometer showed that the engine powered by dual fuel worked stably when diesel was replaced by 40% biogas (containing 50% of CO 2 ) or 30% methane. Dual fuel supplying of the engine caused an increase in the concentration of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide in the exhaust gases and a decrease or no effect in the concentration of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides. It did not significantly affect the dynamics of the vehicle and its useful properties. Biogas that contains a maximum of 50% CO 2 and from which H 2 S, moisture, and siloxanes have been largely removed, is suitable as a fuel for tractors. Such biogas can be obtained in biogas plants from different substrates, e.g., vegetable or agriculture wastes as well as biodegradable municipal wastes.

Suggested Citation

  • Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Stanisław Kruczyński & Wojciech Kamela, 2019. "Evaluation of Using Biogas to Supply the Dual Fuel Diesel Engine of an Agricultural Tractor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1071-:d:215518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/6/1071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Mintz, Marianne M. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: Challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 346-362.
    2. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    3. Rose, Lars & Hussain, Mohammed & Ahmed, Syed & Malek, Kourosh & Costanzo, Robert & Kjeang, Erik, 2013. "A comparative life cycle assessment of diesel and compressed natural gas powered refuse collection vehicles in a Canadian city," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 453-461.
    4. Goulding, D. & Power, N., 2013. "Which is the preferable biogas utilisation technology for anaerobic digestion of agricultural crops in Ireland: Biogas to CHP or biomethane as a transport fuel?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 121-131.
    5. Selim, Mohamed Y.E. & Radwan, M.S. & Saleh, H.E., 2008. "Improving the performance of dual fuel engines running on natural gas/LPG by using pilot fuel derived from jojoba seeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1173-1185.
    6. Lee, Tsung-Han & Huang, Sheng-Rung & Chen, Chiun-Hsun, 2013. "The experimental study on biogas power generation enhanced by using waste heat to preheat inlet gases," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 342-347.
    7. Subramanian, K.A. & Mathad, Vinaya C. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of emission and fuel economy of an automotive spark ignition vehicle fuelled with methane enriched biogas and CNG using chassis dynamometer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 17-29.
    8. Dębowski, Marcin & Zieliński, Marcin & Grala, Anna & Dudek, Magda, 2013. "Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 596-604.
    9. Nwafor, O.M.I, 2000. "Effect of choice of pilot fuel on the performance of natural gas in diesel engines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 495-504.
    10. Papurello, Davide & Lanzini, Andrea & Tognana, Lorenzo & Silvestri, Silvia & Santarelli, Massimo, 2015. "Waste to energy: Exploitation of biogas from organic waste in a 500 Wel solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 145-158.
    11. Bari, Saiful, 1996. "Effect of carbon dioxide on the performance of biogas/diesel duel-fuel engine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 1007-1010.
    12. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    13. Paul, Abhishek & Bose, Probir Kumar & Panua, Raj Sekhar & Banerjee, Rahul, 2013. "An experimental investigation of performance-emission trade off of a CI engine fueled by diesel–compressed natural gas (CNG) combination and diesel–ethanol blends with CNG enrichment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 787-802.
    14. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Warguła & Mateusz Kukla & Piotr Lijewski & Michał Dobrzyński & Filip Markiewicz, 2020. "Impact of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fuel Systems in Small Engine Wood Chippers on Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Valerio Martini & Francesco Mocera & Aurelio Somà, 2022. "Numerical Investigation of a Fuel Cell-Powered Agricultural Tractor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Weronika Gracz & Damian Marcinkowski & Wojciech Golimowski & Filip Szwajca & Maria Strzelczyk & Jacek Wasilewski & Paweł Krzaczek, 2021. "Multifaceted Comparison Efficiency and Emission Characteristics of Multi-Fuel Power Generator Fueled by Different Fuels and Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. George Mallouppas & Elias Ar. Yfantis & Constantina Ioannou & Andreas Paradeisiotis & Angelos Ktoris, 2023. "Application of Biogas and Biomethane as Maritime Fuels: A Review of Research, Technology Development, Innovation Proposals, and Market Potentials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Izabela Samson-Bręk & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Krzysztof Biernat, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of the Life Cycle of Electricity Generation from Biogas in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Salman Abdu Ahmed & Song Zhou & Yuanqing Zhu & Asfaw Solomon Tsegay & Yoming Feng & Naseem Ahmad & Adil Malik, 2020. "Effects of Pig Manure and Corn Straw Generated Biogas and Methane Enriched Biogas on Performance and Emission Characteristics of Dual Fuel Diesel Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. P. A. Harari & N. R. Banapurmath & V. S. Yaliwal & T. M. Yunus Khan & Irfan Anjum Badruddin & Sarfaraz Kamangar & Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia, 2021. "Effect of Injection Timing and Injection Duration of Manifold Injected Fuels in Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Engine Operated with Renewable Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Júlio Ximenes & André Siqueira & Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik, 2021. "Valorisation of Agri- and Aquaculture Residues via Biogas Production for Enhanced Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loh, S.K. & Nasrin, A.B. & Mohamad Azri, S. & Nurul Adela, B. & Muzzammil, N. & Daryl Jay, T. & Stasha Eleanor, R.A. & Lim, W.S. & Choo, Y.M. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2017. "First Report on Malaysia’s experiences and development in biogas capture and utilization from palm oil mill effluent under the Economic Transformation Programme: Current and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1257-1274.
    2. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    3. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. Barik, Debabrata & Murugan, S., 2014. "Investigation on combustion performance and emission characteristics of a DI (direct injection) diesel engine fueled with biogas–diesel in dual fuel mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 760-771.
    6. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Khandal, S.V. & Banapurmath, N.R. & Gaitonde, V.N., 2018. "Effect of hydrogen fuel flow rate, fuel injection timing and exhaust gas recirculation on the performance of dual fuel engine powered with renewable fuels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 79-94.
    8. Abdallah, Muhammed S. & Mansour, Mohy S. & Allam, Nageh K., 2021. "Mapping the stability of free-jet biogas flames under partially premixed combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Khalil, Munawar & Berawi, Mohammed Ali & Heryanto, Rudi & Rizalie, Akhmad, 2019. "Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 323-331.
    10. Gunes, Burcu & Stokes, Joseph & Davis, Paul & Connolly, Cathal & Lawler, Jenny, 2019. "Pre-treatments to enhance biogas yield and quality from anaerobic digestion of whiskey distillery and brewery wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Paul, Abhishek & Panua, Raj Sekhar & Debroy, Durbadal & Bose, Probir Kumar, 2014. "Effect of compressed natural gas dual fuel operation with diesel and Pongamia pinnata methyl ester (PPME) as pilot fuels on performance and emission characteristics of a CI (compression ignition) engi," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 495-509.
    12. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Poblete, Israel Bernardo S. & Araujo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic analysis of sustainable biogas-combined-cycle plant: Time-varying demand and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Hosmath, R.S. & Banapurmath, N.R. & Khandal, S.V. & Gaitonde, V.N. & Basavarajappa, Y.H. & Yaliwal, V.S., 2016. "Effect of compression ratio, CNG flow rate and injection timing on the performance of dual fuel engine operated on honge oil methyl ester (HOME) and compressed natural gas (CNG)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 579-590.
    15. Rayner, Addison J. & Briggs, Johnathan & Tremback, Reed & Clemmer, Ryan M.C., 2017. "Design of an organic waste power plant coupling anaerobic digestion and solid oxide fuel cell technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 563-571.
    16. Sahoo, B.B. & Sahoo, N. & Saha, U.K., 2009. "Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuel on the performance of dual-fuel gas diesel engines--A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1151-1184, August.
    17. Loganath, Radhakrishnan & Senophiyah-Mary, J., 2020. "Critical review on the necessity of bioelectricity generation from slaughterhouse industry waste and wastewater using different anaerobic digestion reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Mancini, G. & Luciano, A. & Bolzonella, D. & Fatone, F. & Viotti, P. & Fino, D., 2021. "A water-waste-energy nexus approach to bridge the sustainability gap in landfill-based waste management regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin, 2015. "Biogas production in Poland—Current state, potential and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 686-695.
    20. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:6:p:1071-:d:215518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.