IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i2p270-d198224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Tailing-Edge Thickness on Aerodynamic Noise for Wind Turbine Airfoil

Author

Listed:
  • Xinkai Li

    (Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Key Laboratory of Wind Energy Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Dalian National Laboratory For Clean Energy, CAS, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Ke Yang

    (Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Key Laboratory of Wind Energy Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Dalian National Laboratory For Clean Energy, CAS, Beijing 100190, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Hao Hu

    (North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Xiaodong Wang

    (College of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shun Kang

    (College of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

The influence of wind turbine airfoil trailing edge thickness on aerodynamics and aerodynamic noise characteristics was studied using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD)/ Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) method in the present work. First, the airfoil of a DU97-W-300-flatback airfoil was chosen as the research object, and numerical method validation was performed. Three kinds of turbulence calculation methods (unsteady Reynolds average Navier-Stokes (URANS), detached eddy simulation (DES), and large eddy simulation (LES)) were investigated in detail, and three sets of grid scales were used to study the impact of the airfoil on the aerodynamic noise. Secondly, the airfoil trailing edge thickness was changed, and the impact of trailing edge thickness on aerodynamics and aerodynamic noise was investigated. Results show that three kinds of turbulence calculation methods yield the same sound pressure frequency, and the magnitude of the sound pressure level (SPL) corresponding to the mean frequency is almost the same. The calculation of the SPL of the peak value and the experimental results can match well with each other, but the calculated core frequency is slightly lower than the experimental frequency. The results of URANS and DES are closer to each other with a changing trend of SPL, and the consequences of the DES calculation are closer to the experimental results. From the comparison of two airfoils, the blunt trailing edge (BTE) airfoil has higher lift and drag coefficients than the original airfoil. The basic frequency of lift coefficients of the BTE airfoil is less than that of the original airfoil. It is demonstrated that the trailing vortex shedding frequency of the original airfoil is higher than that of the BTE airfoil. At a small angle of attack (AOA), the distribution of SPL for the original airfoil exhibits low frequency characteristics, while, at high AOA, the wide frequency characteristic is presented. For the BTE airfoil, the distribution of SPL exhibits low frequency characteristics for the range of the AOA. The maximum AOA of SPL is 4° and the minimum AOA of SPL is 15°, while, for the original airfoil, the maximum AOA of SPL is 19°, and the minimum AOA is 8°. For most AOAs, the SPL of the BTE airfoil is larger than that of the original airfoil.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinkai Li & Ke Yang & Hao Hu & Xiaodong Wang & Shun Kang, 2019. "Effect of Tailing-Edge Thickness on Aerodynamic Noise for Wind Turbine Airfoil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:270-:d:198224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/2/270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Shifeng & Wang, Sicong, 2015. "Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 437-443.
    2. Kaldellis, J.K. & Garakis, K. & Kapsali, M., 2012. "Noise impact assessment on the basis of onsite acoustic noise immission measurements for a representative wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 306-314.
    3. Lee, Seunghoon & Lee, Soogab, 2014. "Numerical and experimental study of aerodynamic noise by a small wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 108-112.
    4. Taylor, Jennifer & Eastwick, Carol & Lawrence, Claire & Wilson, Robin, 2013. "Noise levels and noise perception from small and micro wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-127.
    5. Lee, Sung Gun & Park, Sang Jun & Lee, Kyung Seo & Chung, Chinwha, 2012. "Performance prediction of NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Phase VI blade adopting blunt trailing edge airfoil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 47-61.
    6. Huiwen Liu & Imran Hayat & Yaqing Jin & Leonardo P. Chamorro, 2018. "On the Evolution of the Integral Time Scale within Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Liu, W.Y., 2017. "A review on wind turbine noise mechanism and de-noising techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 311-320.
    8. Wang, Guofu & Zhang, Lei & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2018. "LES simulation and experimental validation of the unsteady aerodynamics of blunt wind turbine airfoils," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 911-923.
    9. Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Barlas, Emre & Bertagnolio, Franck & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær, 2018. "Wind turbine noise generation and propagation modeling at DTU Wind Energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 133-150.
    10. He-Yong Xu & Qing-Li Dong & Chen-Liang Qiao & Zheng-Yin Ye, 2018. "Flow Control over the Blunt Trailing Edge of Wind Turbine Airfoils Using Circulation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain by Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Hyungki Shin & Hogeon Kim & Taehyung Kim & Soo-Hyun Kim & Soogab Lee & Young-Jin Baik & Gilbong Lee, 2017. "Numerical Analysis of Flatback Trailing Edge Airfoil to Reduce Noise in Power Generation Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenjiao Qi & Qinghua Deng & Zhinan Chi & Lehao Hu & Qi Yuan & Zhenping Feng, 2019. "Influence of Disc Tip Geometry on the Aerodynamic Performance and Flow Characteristics of Multichannel Tesla Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Jesús Manuel Fernández Oro & Katia María Argüelles Díaz & Sandra Velarde-Suárez, 2019. "Turbulence-Model Comparison for Aerodynamic-Performance Prediction of a Typical Vertical-Axis Wind-Turbine Airfoil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Xin-Kai Li & Wei Liu & Ting-Jun Zhang & Pei-Ming Wang & Xiao-Dong Wang, 2019. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Vortex Generator Installation Angle on Flow Separation Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Micallef & Gerard Van Bussel, 2018. "A Review of Urban Wind Energy Research: Aerodynamics and Other Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Dean Sesalim & Jamal Naser, 2024. "Effects of an Owl Airfoil on the Aeroacoustics of a Small Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Zhang, Sanxia & Luo, Kun & Yuan, Renyu & Wang, Qiang & Wang, Jianwen & Zhang, Liru & Fan, Jianren, 2018. "Influences of operating parameters on the aerodynamics and aeroacoustics of a horizontal-axis wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 597-611.
    4. Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo & Maria Di Gabriele & Nefta-Eleftheria P. Votsi & John D. Pantis & Vincenzo Paolo Senese, 2015. "Auditory Recognition of Familiar and Unfamiliar Subjects with Wind Turbine Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. José R. Dorrego & Armando Ríos & Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo & Rafael Campos-Amezcua & Reynaldo Iracheta & Orlando Lastres & Pascual López & Antonio Verde & Liliana Hechavarria & Miguel-Angel Pere, 2021. "Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Aerodynamic Noise in Small Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Li, Jian & Liu, Ranhui & Yuan, Peng & Pei, Yanli & Cao, Renjing & Wang, Gang, 2020. "Numerical simulation and application of noise for high-power wind turbines with double blades based on large eddy simulation model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1682-1690.
    7. Anicic, Obrad & Petković, Dalibor & Cvetkovic, Slavica, 2016. "Evaluation of wind turbine noise by soft computing methodologies: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1122-1128.
    8. Francesco Castellani & Davide Astolfi & Matteo Becchetti & Francesco Berno & Filippo Cianetti & Alessandro Cetrini, 2018. "Experimental and Numerical Vibrational Analysis of a Horizontal-Axis Micro-Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Whitfield Aslund, Melissa L. & Ollson, Christopher A. & Knopper, Loren D., 2013. "Projected contributions of future wind farm development to community noise and annoyance levels in Ontario, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 44-50.
    10. Aleksandra Matuszewska-Janica & Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska & Urszula Ala-Karvia & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel, 2021. "Changes in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union Countries in 2005–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Lida Liao & Bin Huang & Qi Tan & Kan Huang & Mei Ma & Kang Zhang, 2020. "Development of an Improved LMD Method for the Low-Frequency Elements Extraction from Turbine Noise Background," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Wang, Shifeng & Wang, Sicong & Smith, Pete, 2015. "Quantifying impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services at local and global scales," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1424-1428.
    13. Yi Fan & Ho Pin Teo & Wayne X. Wan, 2021. "Public transport, noise complaints, and housing: Evidence from sentiment analysis in Singapore," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 570-596, June.
    14. Seixas, M. & Melício, R. & Mendes, V.M.F. & Couto, C., 2016. "Blade pitch control malfunction simulation in a wind energy conversion system with MPC five-level converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 339-350.
    15. Li, Shoutu & Chen, Qin & Li, Ye & Pröbsting, Stefan & Yang, Congxin & Zheng, Xiaobo & Yang, Yannian & Zhu, Weijun & Shen, Wenzhong & Wu, Faming & Li, Deshun & Wang, Tongguang & Ke, Shitang, 2022. "Experimental investigation on noise characteristics of small scale vertical axis wind turbines in urban environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 970-982.
    16. Cao, Jiufa & Nyborg, Camilla Marie & Feng, Ju & Hansen, Kurt S. & Bertagnolio, Franck & Fischer, Andreas & Sørensen, Thomas & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2022. "A new multi-fidelity flow-acoustics simulation framework for wind farm application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Hui Tang & Yulong Lei & Xingzhong Li, 2019. "An Acoustic Source Model for Applications in Low Mach Number Turbulent Flows, Such as a Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Koziński, Grzegorz & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Wind energy in Poland – History, current state, surveys, Renewable Energy Sources Act, SWOT analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 19-33.
    19. Kontogianni, A. & Tourkolias, Ch. & Skourtos, M. & Damigos, D., 2014. "Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 170-177.
    20. Ren, He & Liu, Wenyi & Shan, Mengchen & Wang, Xin & Wang, Zhengfeng, 2021. "A novel wind turbine health condition monitoring method based on composite variational mode entropy and weighted distribution adaptation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 972-980.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:270-:d:198224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.