IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.50year2016issue5pp371-381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical and data mining methods in credit scoring

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza Hooman
  • Govindan Marthandan
  • Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff
  • Mohana Omid
  • Sasan Karamizadeh

    (Multimedia University, Malaysia
    University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Iran
    University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

The growing interest in the credit industry resulted in credit scoring being developed as an essential component, especially in the credit department of banks that deals with huge sums of credit data. When a bank or a credit corporation is assessing a credit application request, they will have to decide whether to approve or deny it. This necessitates the utilization of credit scoring. Although pioneers attempt to compensate for risks via interest rates, current investigations on financial conditions of different sections of society confirmed that interest could not replace risk assessment, which means that credit risk requires its own specialized assessment. With the assistance of sorting methods, credit scoring simplifies the decision-making process. It is almost impossible to analyze this large amount of data in the context of manpower and economy, although the data mining technique helps alleviate this complexity. Nowadays, there are a lot of data mining methodologies being utilized in the management of credit scoring. However, each method has its advantages and limitations, and there has not been a comprehensive approach in determining the most utilized data mining technique in the context of credit scoring. The major goal of this paper is to provide a complete literature survey on applied data mining methods, such as discriminant analysis, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor, Bayesian classifier, decision tree, neural network, survival analysis, fuzzy rule-based system, support vector machine, and hybrid methods. These findings will assist researchers in realizing the most suitable approach in evaluating credit scores, pinpoint limitations, enhance them, and propose new approaches with improved capabilities. Finally, the limitations of the new approaches are discussed, and further suitable methods are recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza Hooman & Govindan Marthandan & Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff & Mohana Omid & Sasan Karamizadeh, 2016. "Statistical and data mining methods in credit scoring," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 50(5), pages 371-381, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:371-381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/619671
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesús Ferrero Bermejo & Juan Francisco Gómez Fernández & Rafael Pino & Adolfo Crespo Márquez & Antonio Jesús Guillén López, 2019. "Review and Comparison of Intelligent Optimization Modelling Techniques for Energy Forecasting and Condition-Based Maintenance in PV Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Fang, Fang & Chen, Yuanyuan, 2019. "A new approach for credit scoring by directly maximizing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 180-194.
    3. Sheikh Rabiul Islam & William Eberle & Sheikh K. Ghafoor & Sid C. Bundy & Douglas A. Talbert & Ambareen Siraj, 2019. "Investigating bankruptcy prediction models in the presence of extreme class imbalance and multiple stages of economy," Papers 1911.09858, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit Scoring; Data Mining; Feature selection; Classification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue5:pp:371-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.