IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i21p4026-d279308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AD/RANS Simulations of Wind Turbine Wake Flow Employing the RSM Turbulence Model: Impact of Isotropic and Anisotropic Inflow Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Linlin Tian

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Yilei Song

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Ning Zhao

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Wenzhong Shen

    (Department of Wind Energy, Fluid Mechanics Section, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Tongguang Wang

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hi-Tech Research for Wind Turbine Design, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

Abstract

The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-based generalized actuator disc method along with the Reynolds stress model (AD/RANS_RSM) is assessed for wind turbine wake simulation. The evaluation is based on validations with four sets of experiments for four horizontal-axis wind turbines with different geometrical characteristics operating in a wide range of wind conditions. Additionally, sensitivity studies on inflow profiles (representing isotropic and anisotropic turbulence) for predicting wake effects are carried out. The focus is on the prediction of the evolution of wake flow in terms of wind velocity and turbulence intensity. Comparisons between the computational results and the measurements demonstrate that in the near and transition wake region with strong anisotropic turbulence, the AD/RANS_RSM methodology exhibits a reasonably good match with all the experimental data sets; however, in the far wake region that is characterized by isotropic turbulence, the AD/RANS_RSM predicts the wake velocity quite accurately but appears to over-estimate the wake turbulence level. While the introduction of the overall turbulence intensity is found to give an improved agreement with the experiments. The performed sensitivity study proves that the anisotropic inflow condition is recommended as the profile of choice to represent the incoming wind flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Linlin Tian & Yilei Song & Ning Zhao & Wenzhong Shen & Tongguang Wang, 2019. "AD/RANS Simulations of Wind Turbine Wake Flow Employing the RSM Turbulence Model: Impact of Isotropic and Anisotropic Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4026-:d:279308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4026/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4026/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shives, Michael & Crawford, Curran, 2016. "Adapted two-equation turbulence closures for actuator disk RANS simulations of wind & tidal turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 273-292.
    2. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.
    3. Rocha, P.A. Costa & Rocha, H.H. Barbosa & Carneiro, F.O. Moura & Vieira da Silva, M.E. & Bueno, A. Valente, 2014. "k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model calibration: A case study on a small scale horizontal axis wind turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 412-418.
    4. Nguyen, Van Thinh & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Santa Cruz, Alina, 2016. "Modelling turbulence with an Actuator Disk representing a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 625-635.
    5. Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2019. "Improving CFD wind farm simulations incorporating wind direction uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1011-1023.
    6. Huilai Ren & Xiaodong Zhang & Shun Kang & Sichao Liang, 2018. "Actuator Disc Approach of Wind Turbine Wake Simulation Considering Balance of Turbulence Kinetic Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Bai, Guanghui & Li, Jun & Fan, Pengfei & Li, Guojun, 2013. "Numerical investigations of the effects of different arrays on power extractions of horizontal axis tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 180-186.
    8. Göçmen, Tuhfe & Laan, Paul van der & Réthoré, Pierre-Elouan & Diaz, Alfredo Peña & Larsen, Gunner Chr. & Ott, Søren, 2016. "Wind turbine wake models developed at the technical university of Denmark: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 752-769.
    9. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    10. Jianxiao Hu & Qingshan Yang & Jian Zhang, 2016. "Study on the Wake of a Miniature Wind Turbine Using the Reynolds Stress Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling & Wang, Tongguang, 2020. "Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Caihang Liang & Rui Zhang & Chaojian Mao & Yanfang Dong & Xiong Yao & Weipeng Hu & Zhenxing Li, 2024. "Design and Optimization of Cross-Corrugated Triangular Ducts with Trapezoidal Baffles Based on Response Surface Methodology and CFD," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling & Wang, Tongguang, 2020. "Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Wang, Zhenming & Zhao, Ning & Zhu, Chunling & Lu, Xiyun, 2024. "Predictive capability of an improved AD/RANS method for multiple wind turbines and wind farm wakes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    3. Eidi, Ali & Ghiassi, Reza & Yang, Xiang & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Model-form uncertainty quantification in RANS simulations of wakes and power losses in wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2212-2223.
    4. Hornshøj-Møller, Simon D. & Nielsen, Peter D. & Forooghi, Pourya & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Quantifying structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1550-1558.
    5. Zehtabiyan-Rezaie, Navid & Abkar, Mahdi, 2024. "An extended k−ɛ model for wake-flow simulation of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Almoghayer, Mohammed A. & Woolf, David K. & Kerr, Sandy & Davies, Gareth, 2022. "Integration of tidal energy into an island energy system – A case study of Orkney islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Asmuth, Henrik & Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Branlard, Emmanuel & Meyer Forsting, Alexander R. & Nilsson, Karl & Jonkman, Jason & Ivanell, Stefan, 2022. "Wind turbine response in waked inflow: A modelling benchmark against full-scale measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 868-887.
    8. Zheng, Jiancai & Wang, Nina & Wan, Decheng & Strijhak, Sergei, 2023. "Numerical investigations of coupled aeroelastic performance of wind turbines by elastic actuator line model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    9. Chen, Yaling & Lin, Binliang & Lin, Jie & Wang, Shujie, 2017. "Experimental study of wake structure behind a horizontal axis tidal stream turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 82-96.
    10. Feng, Dachuan & Li, Larry K.B. & Gupta, Vikrant & Wan, Minping, 2022. "Componentwise influence of upstream turbulence on the far-wake dynamics of wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1081-1091.
    11. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    12. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Gualous, Hamid, 2016. "A semi-analytic method to optimize tidal farm layouts – Application to the Alderney Race (Raz Blanchard), France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1168-1180.
    14. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Bilateral Gaussian Wake Model Formulation for Wind Farms: A Forecasting based approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Lidar assisted wake redirection in wind farms: A data driven approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 484-493.
    16. Huilai Ren & Xiaodong Zhang & Shun Kang & Sichao Liang, 2018. "Actuator Disc Approach of Wind Turbine Wake Simulation Considering Balance of Turbulence Kinetic Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Lo Brutto, Ottavio A. & Guillou, Sylvain S. & Thiébot, Jérôme & Gualous, Hamid, 2017. "Assessing the effectiveness of a global optimum strategy within a tidal farm for power maximization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 653-666.
    18. Chen, Long & Yao, Yu & Wang, Zhi-liang, 2020. "Development and validation of a prediction model for the multi-wake of tidal stream turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 800-809.
    19. Niebuhr, C.M. & Schmidt, S. & van Dijk, M. & Smith, L. & Neary, V.S., 2022. "A review of commercial numerical modelling approaches for axial hydrokinetic turbine wake analysis in channel flow," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Xiao, Pengcheng & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling, 2022. "A new three-dimensional analytical model for wind turbine wake turbulence intensity predictions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 762-776.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:21:p:4026-:d:279308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.