IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v191y2022icp868-887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind turbine response in waked inflow: A modelling benchmark against full-scale measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Asmuth, Henrik
  • Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P.
  • Madsen, Helge Aagaard
  • Branlard, Emmanuel
  • Meyer Forsting, Alexander R.
  • Nilsson, Karl
  • Jonkman, Jason
  • Ivanell, Stefan

Abstract

Predicting the power and loads of wind turbines in waked inflow conditions still presents a major modelling challenge. It requires the accurate modelling of the atmospheric flow conditions, wakes of upstream turbines and the response of the turbine of interest. Rigorous validations of model frameworks against measurements of utility-scale wind turbines in such scenarios remain limited to date. In this study, six models of different fidelity are compared against measurements from the DanAero experiment. The two benchmark cases feature a full-wake and partial-wake scenario, respectively. The simulations are compared against local pressure forces and inflow velocities measured on several blade sections of the downstream turbine, as well as met mast measurements and standard SCADA data. Regardless of the model fidelity, reasonable agreements are found in terms of the wake characteristics and turbine response. For instance, the azimuth variation of the mean aerodynamic forces acting on the blade was captured with a mean relative error of 15–20%. While various model-specific deficiencies could be identified, the study highlights the need for further full-scale measurement campaigns with even more extensive instrumentation. Furthermore, it is concluded that validations should not be limited to integrated and/or time-averaged quantities that conceal characteristic spatial or temporal variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmuth, Henrik & Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Branlard, Emmanuel & Meyer Forsting, Alexander R. & Nilsson, Karl & Jonkman, Jason & Ivanell, Stefan, 2022. "Wind turbine response in waked inflow: A modelling benchmark against full-scale measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 868-887.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:191:y:2022:i:c:p:868-887
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122005080
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shives, Michael & Crawford, Curran, 2016. "Adapted two-equation turbulence closures for actuator disk RANS simulations of wind & tidal turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 273-292.
    2. Lignarolo, Lorenzo E.M. & Mehta, Dhruv & Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Yilmaz, Ali Emre & van Kuik, Gijs & Andersen, Søren J. & Meneveau, Charles & Ferreira, Carlos J. & Ragni, Daniele & Meyers, Johan & v, 2016. "Validation of four LES and a vortex model against stereo-PIV measurements in the near wake of an actuator disc and a wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 510-523.
    3. Bangga, Galih & Lutz, Thorsten, 2021. "Aerodynamic modeling of wind turbine loads exposed to turbulent inflow and validation with experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.
    5. Pierella, Fabio & Krogstad, Per-Åge & Sætran, Lars, 2014. "Blind Test 2 calculations for two in-line model wind turbines where the downstream turbine operates at various rotational speeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 62-77.
    6. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling & Wang, Tongguang, 2020. "Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Krogstad, Per-Åge & Eriksen, Pål Egil, 2013. "“Blind test” calculations of the performance and wake development for a model wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 325-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Cañadillas & Richard Foreman & Gerald Steinfeld & Nick Robinson, 2023. "Cumulative Interactions between the Global Blockage and Wake Effects as Observed by an Engineering Model and Large-Eddy Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Chanprasert, W. & Sharma, R.N. & Cater, J.E. & Norris, S.E., 2022. "Large Eddy Simulation of wind turbine wake interaction in directionally sheared inflows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1096-1110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lignarolo, Lorenzo E.M. & Mehta, Dhruv & Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Yilmaz, Ali Emre & van Kuik, Gijs & Andersen, Søren J. & Meneveau, Charles & Ferreira, Carlos J. & Ragni, Daniele & Meyers, Johan & v, 2016. "Validation of four LES and a vortex model against stereo-PIV measurements in the near wake of an actuator disc and a wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 510-523.
    2. Deskos, Georgios & Laizet, Sylvain & Piggott, Matthew D., 2019. "Turbulence-resolving simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 989-1002.
    3. Amin Allah, Veisi & Shafiei Mayam, Mohammad Hossein, 2017. "Large Eddy Simulation of flow around a single and two in-line horizontal-axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 533-544.
    4. Dai, Xuan & Xu, Da & Zhang, Mengqi & Stevens, Richard J.A.M., 2022. "A three-dimensional dynamic mode decomposition analysis of wind farm flow aerodynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 608-624.
    5. He, Ruiyang & Sun, Haiying & Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Wind tunnel tests for wind turbines: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Tian, Linlin & Song, Yilei & Zhao, Ning & Shen, Wenzhong & Zhu, Chunling & Wang, Tongguang, 2020. "Effects of turbulence modelling in AD/RANS simulations of single wind & tidal turbine wakes and double wake interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Linlin Tian & Yilei Song & Ning Zhao & Wenzhong Shen & Tongguang Wang, 2019. "AD/RANS Simulations of Wind Turbine Wake Flow Employing the RSM Turbulence Model: Impact of Isotropic and Anisotropic Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Eriksen, Pål Egil & Krogstad, Per-Åge, 2017. "Development of coherent motion in the wake of a model wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 449-460.
    9. Veisi, Amin Allah & Shafiei Mayam, Mohammad Hossein, 2017. "Effects of blade rotation direction in the wake region of two in-line turbines using Large Eddy Simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 375-392.
    10. Thé, Jesse & Yu, Hesheng, 2017. "A critical review on the simulations of wind turbine aerodynamics focusing on hybrid RANS-LES methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 257-289.
    11. Lee, Hakjin & Lee, Duck-Joo, 2020. "Low Reynolds number effects on aerodynamic loads of a small scale wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1283-1293.
    12. Zhaobin Li & Xiaohao Liu & Xiaolei Yang, 2022. "Review of Turbine Parameterization Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Liu, Cheng & Hu, Changhong, 2019. "An actuator line - immersed boundary method for simulation of multiple tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 473-490.
    14. Qian, Yaoru & Wang, Tongguang & Yuan, Yiping & Zhang, Yuquan, 2020. "Comparative study on wind turbine wakes using a modified partially-averaged Navier-Stokes method and large eddy simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil & Safiyullah, Ferozkhan & Ng, E.Y.K. & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2020. "New analytical wake models based on artificial intelligence and rivalling the benchmark full-rotor CFD predictions under both uniform and ABL inflows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Amiri, Mojtaba Maali & Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F., 2024. "A review of physical and numerical modeling techniques for horizontal-axis wind turbine wakes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Hornshøj-Møller, Simon D. & Nielsen, Peter D. & Forooghi, Pourya & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Quantifying structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1550-1558.
    18. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.
    19. Hamlaoui, M.N. & Smaili, A. & Dobrev, I. & Pereira, M. & Fellouah, H. & Khelladi, S., 2022. "Numerical and experimental investigations of HAWT near wake predictions using Particle Image Velocimetry and Actuator Disk Method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    20. Abutunis, A. & Taylor, G. & Fal, M. & Chandrashekhara, K., 2020. "Experimental evaluation of coaxial horizontal axis hydrokinetic composite turbine system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 232-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:191:y:2022:i:c:p:868-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.