IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i14p2813-d250514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Maurício José Ribeiro Rotta

    (Department of Knowledge Engineering and Management, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Denilson Sell

    (Department of Knowledge Engineering and Management, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
    Department of Business Administration, State University of Santa Catarina, Av. Me. Benvenuta, 2007, Itacorubi, Florianopolis 88035-001, Brazil)

  • Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco

    (Department of Knowledge Engineering and Management, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil)

  • Tan Yigitcanlar

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

Abstract

Good governance practices through electronic government (eGov) platforms can be suitable instruments for strengthening the outcomes of smart city policies. While eGov is the application of information and communication technologies to public services, good governance defines how well public authorities manage public and social resources. Contemporary public management views, such as ‘new public service’, include citizen participation as a critical factor to sustainable government in smart cities. Public services, in the age of digital technology, need to not only be delivered through eGov platforms, but also need to be coproduced with the engagement of social players, e.g., citizens. In this sense, eGov platforms act as digital commons, and conceived as digital spaces, where citizens and public agents interact and collaborate. In this paper, we presented the Municipal eGov Platform Assessment Model (MEPA), which is a model specifically developed to evaluate eGov platforms regarding their potential to promote commons in smart cities. The study applied MEPA to 903 municipal websites across Brazil. The results revealed that the majority of investigated Brazilian eGov platforms have only a low level of digital commons maturity. This finding discloses less citizenship coproduction, and fewer opportunities for city smartness. As the MEPA model offers public authorities an instrument to depict weaknesses and strengths of municipal eGov platforms, its adoption provides an opportunity for authorities to plan and manage their platforms to act as promoters of digital commons and citizen coproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurício José Ribeiro Rotta & Denilson Sell & Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2019. "Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2813-:d:250514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stepchenkova, Svetlana & Tang, Liang & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn) & Kirilenko, Andrei P. & Morrison, Alastair M., 2010. "Benchmarking CVB website performance: Spatial and structural patterns," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 611-620.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Popescu Mirona Ana Maria & Barbu Andreea & Costea-Marcu Iustina-Cristina & Dumitriu Dan, 2024. "Conceptual Framework for Unified E-Government Web Platform," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 3503-3514.
    2. Tan Yigitcanlar & Federico Cugurullo, 2020. "The Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence: An Urbanistic Viewpoint from the Lens of Smart and Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Sha, Kritika & Taeihagh, Araz & De Jong, Martin, 2024. "Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Josef Vodák & Dominika Šulyová & Milan Kubina, 2021. "Advanced Technologies and Their Use in Smart City Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Tan Yigitcanlar & Kevin C. Desouza & Luke Butler & Farnoosh Roozkhosh, 2020. "Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-38, March.
    7. Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz & Justyna Przywojska & Justyna Wiktorowicz, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Communities in Poland. An Analysis of Institutional and Individual Conditions for a New Concept of Smart Development of Ageing Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Yu Zeng & Quan Zhang & Qi Zhao & Huang Huang, 2023. "Doing more among institutional boundaries: Platform‐enabled government in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 458-478, May.
    9. Marimuthu, Malliga & D'Souza, Clare & Shukla, Yupal, 2022. "Integrating community value into the adoption framework: A systematic review of conceptual research on participatory smart city applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Tan Yigitcanlar & Hoon Han & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Approaches, Advances, and Applications in the Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Commentary from the Guest Editors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Seng Boon Lim & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-31, August.
    12. Seng Boon Lim & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Post-Materialist Values of Smart City Societies: International Comparison of Public Values for Good Enough Governance," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Michael G. Hunter & Alessandro Soro & Ross A. Brown & Joel Harman & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Augmenting Community Engagement in City 4.0: Considerations for Digital Agency in Urban Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Debora Sotto & Arlindo Philippi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Md Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Aligning Urban Policy with Climate Action in the Global South: Are Brazilian Cities Considering Climate Emergency in Local Planning Practice?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiou, Wen-Chih & Lin, Chin-Chao & Perng, Chyuan, 2011. "A strategic website evaluation of online travel agencies," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1463-1473.
    2. Tonghui Lian & Caihua Yu & Zhongqun Wang & Zhiping Hou, 2017. "The evaluation study on tourism websites: from the perspective of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(16), pages 2877-2889, December.
    3. Park, Sangwon & Kim, Dae-Young, 2017. "Assessing language discrepancies between travelers and online travel recommendation systems: Application of the Jaccard distance score to web data mining," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 381-388.
    4. Tang, Liang (Rebecca) & Jang, Soocheong (Shawn) & Morrison, Alastair, 2012. "Dual-route communication of destination websites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 38-49.
    5. Pike, Steven & Page, Stephen J., 2014. "Destination Marketing Organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 202-227.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2813-:d:250514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.