IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i9p2268-d353992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart and Age-Friendly Communities in Poland. An Analysis of Institutional and Individual Conditions for a New Concept of Smart Development of Ageing Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz

    (Department of Labour and Social Policy, University of Łódź, ulica Rewolucji 1905 roku nr 37, 90-214 Łódź, Poland)

  • Justyna Przywojska

    (Department of Labour and Social Policy, University of Łódź, ulica Rewolucji 1905 roku nr 37, 90-214 Łódź, Poland)

  • Justyna Wiktorowicz

    (Department of Economic and Social Statistics, University of Łódź, ulica Rewolucji 1905 roku nr 41, 90-214 Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

In the face of the dynamic ageing of local communities, smart cities and smart villages programs should seek to ensure meeting the needs of the elderly and promoting solutions tailored to their computer literacy, digital skills, and perception capabilities. In this context we propose to approach local smart and age-friendly communities initiatives in a way that would provide responses to two contemporary megatrends: digitalization and demographic transition. We assumed that the deployment of such initiatives in local planning and governance depends on at least two conditions: demand for smart everyday products and services represented by older adults and the perspective of the local decision-makers. The paper aims to examine whether the smart city/smart village idea focused on meeting the needs of the elderly and seeking to shape age-friendly local communities and the environment could be implemented in the municipalities in Poland. The analysis of the elderly Poles’ capabilities to absorb the ICT solutions demonstrated that the smart and age-friendly community approach may face implementation difficulties, especially in the oldest groups of the Polish rural population. Results of the quantitative study conducted in 1236 municipalities revealed that local authorities perceive local policy goals, such as pursuing smart and age-friendly development as low priority ones. A citizen-centered approach of village heads and mayors to the local policy is critical for integrating these two priorities of being smart and age-friendly.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldona Podgórniak-Krzykacz & Justyna Przywojska & Justyna Wiktorowicz, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Communities in Poland. An Analysis of Institutional and Individual Conditions for a New Concept of Smart Development of Ageing Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2268-:d:353992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuba Bakıcı & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2013. "A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    2. Rosario Ferrara, 2015. "The Smart City and the Green Economy in Europe: A Critical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Claire Thorne & Catherine Griffiths, 2014. "Smart, Smarter, Smartest: Redefining Our Cities," Progress in IS, in: Renata Paola Dameri & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux (ed.), Smart City, edition 127, pages 89-99, Springer.
    4. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai, 2001. "From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases," Working Papers 47, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    5. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    6. Paraskevi Giourka & Mark W. J. L. Sanders & Komninos Angelakoglou & Dionysis Pramangioulis & Nikos Nikolopoulos & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Athanasios Tryferidis & Dimitrios Tzovaras, 2019. "The Smart City Business Model Canvas—A Smart City Business Modeling Framework and Practical Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    8. Sofie Van Regenmortel & Liesbeth De Donder & An-Sofie Smetcoren & Deborah Lambotte & Nico De Witte & Dominique Verté, 2018. "Accumulation of Disadvantages: Prevalence and Categories of Old-Age Social Exclusion in Belgium," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 1173-1194, December.
    9. Tan Yigitcanlar & Hoon Han & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Approaches, Advances, and Applications in the Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Commentary from the Guest Editors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Guzal-Dec, Danuta, 2018. "Intelligent Development Of The Countryside – The Concept Of Smart Villages: Assumptions, Possibilities And Implementation Limitations," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 11(3), September.
    11. Renata Paola Dameri & Francesca Ricciardi, 2017. "Leveraging Smart City Projects for Benefitting Citizens: The Role of ICTs," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Stamatina Th. Rassia & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Smart City Networks, pages 111-128, Springer.
    12. Richard Hu, 2019. "The State of Smart Cities in China: The Case of Shenzhen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Maurício José Ribeiro Rotta & Denilson Sell & Roberto Carlos dos Santos Pacheco & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2019. "Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Justyna Przywojska, 2021. "Polish Local Government’s Perspective on Revitalisation: A Framework for Future Socially Sustainable Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Loredana Ivan & Dorin Beu & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Łukasz Satoła & Anna Milewska, 2022. "The Concept of a Smart Village as an Innovative Way of Implementing Public Tasks in the Era of Instability on the Energy Market—Examples from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sha, Kritika & Taeihagh, Araz & De Jong, Martin, 2024. "Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Joanna Wyrwa & Magdalena ZaraÅ› & Katarzyna Wolak, 2021. "Smart Solutions in Cities during the Covid-19 Pandemic," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 4(2), pages 88-103, April.
    3. Hodžić Sabina & Paleka Hana, 2020. "Fiscal Capacities of Large Cities in Croatia – Financial Support for Smart Cities," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(2), pages 42-49, June.
    4. Tan Yigitcanlar & Hoon Han & Md. Kamruzzaman, 2019. "Approaches, Advances, and Applications in the Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Commentary from the Guest Editors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Paula Bajdor & Marta Starostka-Patyk, 2021. "Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Nripendra P. Rana & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Rubina Islam & Sian Roderick & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Barriers to the Development of Smart Cities in Indian Context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 503-525, June.
    7. Navidreza Alizadeh Bazrafshan & Omid Ali Kharazmi, 2022. "Contextual challenges of smart city implementation in Mashhad, Iran's second‐largest metropolis," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    8. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    9. Tan Yigitcanlar & Kevin C. Desouza & Luke Butler & Farnoosh Roozkhosh, 2020. "Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-38, March.
    10. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Filiou, Despoina & Kesidou, Effie & Wu, Lichao, 2023. "Are smart cities green? The role of environmental and digital policies for Eco-innovation in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    12. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    13. Erik Karger & Marvin Jagals & Frederik Ahlemann, 2021. "Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Sławomira Hajduk, 2020. "Modele smart city a zarządzanie przestrzenne miast," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 123-139.
    18. van den Buuse, Daniel & Kolk, Ans, 2019. "An exploration of smart city approaches by international ICT firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 220-234.
    19. Hamed Khatibi & Suzanne Wilkinson & Graham Eriwata & Lukuba N Sweya & Mostafa Baghersad & Heiman Dianat & Khaled Ghaedi & Ahad Javanmardi, 2022. "An integrated framework for assessment of smart city resilience," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1556-1577, June.
    20. Nilssen, Maja, 2019. "To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 98-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:2268-:d:353992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.