IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i10p1925-d232759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Large-Eddy Simulation-Based Assessment of the Risk of Wind Turbine Failures Due to Terrain-Induced Turbulence over a Wind Farm in Complex Terrain

Author

Listed:
  • Takanori Uchida

    (Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM), Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-kouen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan)

  • Susumu Takakuwa

    (Eurus Energy Holdings Corporation, 3-13, Toranomon 4-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan)

Abstract

The first part of the present study investigated the relationship among the number of yaw gear and motor failures and turbulence intensity (TI) at all the wind turbines under investigation with the use of in situ data. The investigation revealed that wind turbine #7 (T7), which experienced a large number of failures, was affected by terrain-induced turbulence with TI that exceeded the TI presumed for the wind turbine design class to which T7 belongs. Subsequently, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was performed to examine if the abovementioned observed wind flow characteristics could be successfully simulated. The CFD software package that was used in the present study was RIAM-COMPACT, which was developed by the first author of the present paper. RIAM-COMPACT is a nonlinear, unsteady wind prediction model that uses large-eddy simulation (LES) for the turbulence model. RIAM-COMPACT is capable of simulating flow collision, separation, and reattachment and also various unsteady turbulence–eddy phenomena that are caused by flow collision, separation, and reattachment. A close examination of computer animations of the streamwise (x) wind velocity revealed the following findings: As we predicted, wind flow that was separated from a micro-topographical feature (micro-scale terrain undulations) upstream of T7 generated large vortices. These vortices were shed downstream in a nearly periodic manner, which in turn generated terrain-induced turbulence, affecting T7 directly. Finally, the temporal change of the streamwise (x) wind velocity (a non-dimensional quantity) at the hub-height of T7 in the period from 600 to 800 in non-dimensional time was re-scaled in such a way that the average value of the streamwise (x) wind velocity for this period was 8.0 m/s, and the results of the analysis of the re-scaled data were discussed. With the re-scaled full-scale streamwise wind velocity (m/s) data (total number of data points: approximately 50,000; time interval: 0.3 s), the time-averaged streamwise (x) wind velocity and TI were evaluated using a common statistical processing procedure adopted for in situ data. Specifically, 10-min moving averaging (number of sample data points: 1932) was performed on the re-scaled data. Comparisons of the evaluated TI values to the TI values from the normal turbulence model in IEC61400-1 Ed.3 (2005) revealed the following: Although the evaluated TI values were not as large as those observed in situ, some of the evaluated TI values exceeded the values for turbulence class A, suggesting that the influence of terrain-induced turbulence on the wind turbine was well simulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2019. "A Large-Eddy Simulation-Based Assessment of the Risk of Wind Turbine Failures Due to Terrain-Induced Turbulence over a Wind Farm in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:1925-:d:232759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/1925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/1925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Gasset & Mathieu Landry & Yves Gagnon, 2012. "A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Rafael V. Rodrigues & Corinne Lengsfeld, 2019. "Development of a Computational System to Improve Wind Farm Layout, Part I: Model Validation and Near Wake Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Fernando Porté-Agel & Yu-Ting Wu & Chang-Hung Chen, 2013. "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wind Direction on Turbine Wakes and Power Losses in a Large Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Predict the Actual Wind Speed over Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Investigation of Wind Turbine Nacelle Separation Accident over Complex Terrain in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "LES Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain and Economic Effects of Wind Turbine Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Murthy, K.S.R. & Rahi, O.P., 2017. "A comprehensive review of wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1320-1342.
    8. Simões, Teresa & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2016. "A new methodology for urban wind resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 598-605.
    9. Francesco Castellani & Marco Buzzoni & Davide Astolfi & Gianluca D’Elia & Giorgio Dalpiaz & Ludovico Terzi, 2017. "Wind Turbine Loads Induced by Terrain and Wakes: An Experimental Study through Vibration Analysis and Computational Fluid Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain by Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Rafael V. Rodrigues & Corinne Lengsfeld, 2019. "Development of a Computational System to Improve Wind Farm Layout, Part II: Wind Turbine Wakes Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takanori Uchida, 2020. "Effects of Inflow Shear on Wake Characteristics of Wind-Turbines over Flat Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Takanori Uchida & Yoshihiro Taniyama & Yuki Fukatani & Michiko Nakano & Zhiren Bai & Tadasuke Yoshida & Masaki Inui, 2020. "A New Wind Turbine CFD Modeling Method Based on a Porous Disk Approach for Practical Wind Farm Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Susumu Takakuwa & Takanori Uchida, 2022. "Improvement of Airflow Simulation by Refining the Inflow Wind Direction and Applying Atmospheric Stability for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms Affected by Topography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Gürdal Ertek & Lakshmi Kailas, 2021. "Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-34, November.
    5. Takanori Uchida, 2019. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain Using High-Resolution Elevation Data and Surface Roughness Data Constructed with a Drone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Takanori Uchida & Yasushi Kawashima, 2019. "New Assessment Scales for Evaluating the Degree of Risk of Wind Turbine Blade Damage Caused by Terrain-Induced Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Takanori Uchida & Tadasuke Yoshida & Masaki Inui & Yoshihiro Taniyama, 2021. "Doppler Lidar Investigations of Wind Turbine Near-Wakes and LES Modeling with New Porous Disc Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-33, April.
    8. Takanori Uchida & Kenichiro Sugitani, 2020. "Numerical and Experimental Study of Topographic Speed-Up Effects in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.
    9. Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2020. "Numerical Investigation of Stable Stratification Effects on Wind Resource Assessment in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain by Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Takanori Uchida & Yasushi Kawashima, 2019. "New Assessment Scales for Evaluating the Degree of Risk of Wind Turbine Blade Damage Caused by Terrain-Induced Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Takanori Uchida & Kenichiro Sugitani, 2020. "Numerical and Experimental Study of Topographic Speed-Up Effects in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.
    4. Koichi Watanabe & Yuji Ohya & Takanori Uchida, 2019. "Power Output Enhancement of a Ducted Wind Turbine by Stabilizing Vortices around the Duct," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Takanori Uchida, 2019. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain Using High-Resolution Elevation Data and Surface Roughness Data Constructed with a Drone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Predict the Actual Wind Speed over Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    8. Regodeseves, P. García & Morros, C. Santolaria, 2020. "Unsteady numerical investigation of the full geometry of a horizontal axis wind turbine: Flow through the rotor and wake," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Yang, Xiaolei & Milliren, Christopher & Kistner, Matt & Hogg, Christopher & Marr, Jeff & Shen, Lian & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2021. "High-fidelity simulations and field measurements for characterizing wind fields in a utility-scale wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    10. Lattawan Niyomtham & Charoenporn Lertsathittanakorn & Jompob Waewsak & Yves Gagnon, 2022. "Mesoscale/Microscale and CFD Modeling for Wind Resource Assessment: Application to the Andaman Coast of Southern Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Gürdal Ertek & Lakshmi Kailas, 2021. "Analyzing a Decade of Wind Turbine Accident News with Topic Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Shantanu Purohit & Ijaz Fazil Syed Ahmed Kabir & E. Y. K. Ng, 2021. "On the Accuracy of uRANS and LES-Based CFD Modeling Approaches for Rotor and Wake Aerodynamics of the (New) MEXICO Wind Turbine Rotor Phase-III," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Li, Jiale & Wang, Xuefei & Yu, Xiong (Bill), 2018. "Use of spatio-temporal calibrated wind shear model to improve accuracy of wind resource assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 469-485.
    14. Susumu Takakuwa & Takanori Uchida, 2022. "Improvement of Airflow Simulation by Refining the Inflow Wind Direction and Applying Atmospheric Stability for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms Affected by Topography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2020. "Numerical Investigation of Stable Stratification Effects on Wind Resource Assessment in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-32, December.
    16. Alexander Vallejo Díaz & Idalberto Herrera Moya & Edwin Garabitos Lara & Cándida K. Casilla Victorino, 2024. "Assessment of Urban Wind Potential and the Stakeholders Involved in Energy Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Akintayo T. Abolude & Wen Zhou, 2018. "A Comparative Computational Fluid Dynamic Study on the Effects of Terrain Type on Hub-Height Wind Aerodynamic Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Shah Rukh Abbas & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Muhammad Naqvi & Adeel Javed & Salman Raza Naqvi & Kafait Ullah & Tauseef-ur-Rehman Khan & Dong Ryeol Shin, 2020. "Impact Analysis of Large-Scale Wind Farms Integration in Weak Transmission Grid from Technical Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    19. Antonini, Enrico G.A. & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2019. "Improving CFD wind farm simulations incorporating wind direction uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1011-1023.
    20. Stosic, Tatijana & Telesca, Luciano & Stosic, Borko, 2021. "Multiparametric statistical and dynamical analysis of angular high-frequency wind speed time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:10:p:1925-:d:232759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.