IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1362-d1334164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Urban Wind Potential and the Stakeholders Involved in Energy Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Vallejo Díaz

    (Instituto Especializado de Estudios Superiores Loyola, San Cristóbal 91000, Dominican Republic
    Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo 10602, Dominican Republic)

  • Idalberto Herrera Moya

    (Instituto Especializado de Estudios Superiores Loyola, San Cristóbal 91000, Dominican Republic
    Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo 10602, Dominican Republic
    Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica e Industrial, Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas (UCLV), Santa Clara 54830, Cuba)

  • Edwin Garabitos Lara

    (Instituto Especializado de Estudios Superiores Loyola, San Cristóbal 91000, Dominican Republic)

  • Cándida K. Casilla Victorino

    (Instituto Especializado de Estudios Superiores Loyola, San Cristóbal 91000, Dominican Republic)

Abstract

Urban wind energy has emerged as an attractive source of distributed generation in cities to achieve sustainable development goals. The advancement in technologies for the use of urban wind energy has offered an alternative for the decarbonization of cities and the energy transition. The objectives of this work are (1) to identify the potential of wind energy through numerical weather prediction (NWP) data tools and (2) to identify the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved in the decision-making process. A methodology was developed in two phases and applied to a case study in the Dominican Republic. The first phase consisted of estimating the wind energy potential for the 32 provinces at a height of 10 m using open access NWP tools provided by NASA. In the second phase, 28 stakeholders were identified through snowball sampling. The Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed (RACI) matrix tool was applied to identify the roles of the 28 institutions addressed at the country level as relevant in the decision-making process for the energy sector. The annual average wind speed and energy potential for each province were determined. It was found that 24 provinces have poor potentials, below <4.5 m/s. In the northwest and east is where there is the greatest potential, between 4.83 and 6.63 m/s. The population density was established, and it was observed that the provinces with greater potential are less densely populated. Through 59 interviews, 28 institutions were identified and evaluated due to their relevance in decision making for the implementation of energy projects. According to the RACI matrix, the Ministry of Energy and Mines has been categorized as “A”, electricity distribution companies as “R”, energy associations and universities as “C”, and educational and justice institutions as “I”.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Vallejo Díaz & Idalberto Herrera Moya & Edwin Garabitos Lara & Cándida K. Casilla Victorino, 2024. "Assessment of Urban Wind Potential and the Stakeholders Involved in Energy Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1362-:d:1334164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karkowska, Renata & Urjasz, Szczepan, 2023. "How does the Russian-Ukrainian war change connectedness and hedging opportunities? Comparison between dirty and clean energy markets versus global stock indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Michael G. Pollitt, 2015. "In Search of 'Good' Energy Policy: The Social Limits to Technological Solutions to Energy and Climate Problems," Working Papers EPRG 1520, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Satya Widya Yudha & Benny Tjahjono, 2019. "Stakeholder Mapping and Analysis of the Renewable Energy Industry in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Schlindwein, L.F. & Montalvo, C., 2023. "Energy citizenship: Accounting for the heterogeneity of human behaviours within energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Simões, Teresa & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2016. "A new methodology for urban wind resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 598-605.
    6. Alice Altissimo, 2016. "Combining Egocentric Network Maps and Narratives: An Applied Analysis of Qualitative Network Map Interviews," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 152-164, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hirmer, S.A. & George-Williams, H. & Rhys, J. & McNicholl, D. & McCulloch, M., 2021. "Stakeholder decision-making: Understanding Sierra Leone's energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Arfaoui, Nadia, 2023. "Exploring downside risk dependence across energy markets: Electricity, conventional energy, carbon, and clean energy during episodes of market crises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    3. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    4. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Sarah Jamal Mattar & Mohammad Reza Kavian Nezhad & Michael Versteege & Carlos F. Lange & Brian A. Fleck, 2021. "Validation Process for Rooftop Wind Regime CFD Model in Complex Urban Environment Using an Experimental Measurement Campaign," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Pariman Boostani & Giuseppe Pellegrini-Masini & Jørgen Klein, 2024. "The Role of Community Energy Schemes in Reducing Energy Poverty and Promoting Social Inclusion: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Satya Widya Yudha & Benny Tjahjono & Philip Longhurst, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Recount on the Dynamics of Indonesia’s Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Liu, Chen & Shao, Zhen & Jiao, Jianling & Yang, Shanlin, 2024. "How connected is withholding capacity to electricity, fossil fuel and carbon markets? Perspectives from a high renewable energy consumption economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Meisheng He & Habib Forootan Fard & Khalid Yahya & Mahmoud Mohamed & Ibrahim Alhamrouni & Lilik Jamilatul Awalin, 2023. "Optimal Design of Hybrid Renewable Systems, Including Grid, PV, Bio Generator, Diesel Generator, and Battery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Thomas Baldauf & Patrick Jochem, 2024. "Project finance or corporate finance for renewable energy? an agent-based insight," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 19(4), pages 759-805, October.
    11. Hafidz Wibisono & Jon C. Lovett & Dhimas Bayu Anindito, 2023. "The contestation of ideas behind Indonesia's rural electrification policies: The influence of global and national institutional dynamics," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    12. Maneejuk, Paravee & Kaewtathip, Nuttaphong & Yamaka, Woraphon, 2024. "The influence of the Ukraine-Russia conflict on renewable and fossil energy price cycles," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. Mariana Losada-Agudelo & Sebastian Souyris, 2024. "Sustainable Operations Management in the Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2024," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-33, September.
    14. Wang, Lu & Guan, Li & Ding, Qian & Zhang, Hongwei, 2023. "Asymmetric impact of COVID-19 news on the connectedness of the green energy, dirty energy, and non-ferrous metal markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Tran, Thomas T.D. & Smith, Amanda D., 2017. "fEvaluation of renewable energy technologies and their potential for technical integration and cost-effective use within the U.S. energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1372-1388.
    16. Shah, Adil Ahmad & Sahay, Arvind, 2024. "Is gold a preferable diversifier of cleaner equity risk across diverse scenarios? Evidence from multidimensional connectedness and spillover measures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    17. Li, Hailing & Pei, Xiaoyun & Yang, Yimin & Zhang, Hua, 2024. "Assessing the impact of energy-related uncertainty on G20 stock market returns: A decomposed contemporaneous and lagged R2 connectedness approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Takanori Uchida & Yasushi Kawashima, 2019. "New Assessment Scales for Evaluating the Degree of Risk of Wind Turbine Blade Damage Caused by Terrain-Induced Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-27, July.
    19. Juan, Yu-Hsuan & Rezaeiha, Abdolrahim & Montazeri, Hamid & Blocken, Bert & Wen, Chih-Yung & Yang, An-Shik, 2022. "CFD assessment of wind energy potential for generic high-rise buildings in close proximity: Impact of building arrangement and height," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    20. Michael G. Pollitt, 2016. "A Global Carbon Market?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1615, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1362-:d:1334164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.