IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i7p1748-d156026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparation and Evaluation of a Coconut Shell-Based Activated Carbon for CO 2 /CH 4 Separation

Author

Listed:
  • Amna Abdeljaoued

    (LR11ES54-Laboratory of “Chemical Processes and Industrials Systems”, University of Gabes, Gabès 6029, Tunisia
    National School of Engineers of Gabes (ENIG), University of Gabes, Omar Ibn Elkhattab Street, Zrig, Gabès 6029, Tunisia)

  • Nausika Querejeta

    (Instituto Nacional del Carbón, INCAR-CSIC, c/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Inés Durán

    (Instituto Nacional del Carbón, INCAR-CSIC, c/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Noelia Álvarez-Gutiérrez

    (Instituto Nacional del Carbón, INCAR-CSIC, c/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Covadonga Pevida

    (Instituto Nacional del Carbón, INCAR-CSIC, c/Francisco Pintado Fe 26, 33011 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Mohamed Hachemi Chahbani

    (LR11ES54-Laboratory of “Chemical Processes and Industrials Systems”, University of Gabes, Gabès 6029, Tunisia
    Higher Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology of Gabes, University of Gabes, Omar Ibn Elkhattab Street, Zrig, Gabes 6029, Tunisia)

Abstract

Biomass is a widely distributed and renewable source of carbon. The main objective of this work is to produce an activated carbon from coconut shells with suitable characteristics to separate CO 2 from biogas. The textural characterization of the adsorbent has been determined. Pure component adsorption isotherms of CO 2 and CH 4 at 30, 50 and 70 °C have been measured. The results reveal that the activated carbon had high CO 2 adsorption capacity. Equilibrium of adsorption of CO 2 and CH 4 adsorption on the produced activated carbon reached 8.36 mmol/g and 4.63 mmol/g, respectively, at 30 °C and 10 bars. Moreover, the performance of the produced activated carbon, as a potential adsorbent for CO 2 capture from a CO 2 /CH 4 gas mixture, has been evaluated under dynamic conditions in a dedicated fixed-bed setup. The CO 2 and CH 4 adsorption capacities of the produced activated carbon are estimated to be 1.86 and 0.52 mol/kg, respectively, at 30 °C and 1 bar.

Suggested Citation

  • Amna Abdeljaoued & Nausika Querejeta & Inés Durán & Noelia Álvarez-Gutiérrez & Covadonga Pevida & Mohamed Hachemi Chahbani, 2018. "Preparation and Evaluation of a Coconut Shell-Based Activated Carbon for CO 2 /CH 4 Separation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1748-:d:156026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bobo Zheng & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "Carbon Capture and Storage Development Trends from a Techno-Paradigm Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Chamseddine Guizani & Mejdi Jeguirim & Sylvie Valin & Lionel Limousy & Sylvain Salvador, 2017. "Biomass Chars: The Effects of Pyrolysis Conditions on Their Morphology, Structure, Chemical Properties and Reactivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Ben-Mansour, R. & Habib, M.A. & Bamidele, O.E. & Basha, M. & Qasem, N.A.A. & Peedikakkal, A. & Laoui, T. & Ali, M., 2016. "Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 225-255.
    4. Imen Ghouma & Mejdi Jeguirim & Uta Sager & Lionel Limousy & Simona Bennici & Eckhard Däuber & Christof Asbach & Roman Ligotski & Frank Schmidt & Abdelmottaleb Ouederni, 2017. "The Potential of Activated Carbon Made of Agro-Industrial Residues in NO x Immissions Abatement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Zhou, Kui & Chaemchuen, Somboon & Verpoort, Francis, 2017. "Alternative materials in technologies for Biogas upgrading via CO2 capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1414-1441.
    6. Gang Xu & Feifei Liang & Yongping Yang & Yue Hu & Kai Zhang & Wenyi Liu, 2014. "An Improved CO 2 Separation and Purification System Based on Cryogenic Separation and Distillation Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Mejdi Jeguirim & Lionel Limousy, 2017. "Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Plaza, M.G. & González, A.S. & Pis, J.J. & Rubiera, F. & Pevida, C., 2014. "Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: Effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 551-562.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mejdi Jeguirim & Lionel Limousy, 2019. "Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications II," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6, January.
    2. Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2023. "Adsorption Processes for CO 2 Capture from Biogas Streams," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-4, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. A. G. Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Enas Taha Sayed & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Hussein M. Maghrabie & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2022. "Prospect of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Technology and Its Impact on the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-38, November.
    3. Mejdi Jeguirim & Lionel Limousy, 2017. "Biomass Chars: Elaboration, Characterization and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Greco, Gianluca & Canevesi, Rafael L.S. & Di Stasi, Christian & Celzard, Alain & Fierro, Vanessa & Manyà, Joan J., 2022. "Biomass-derived carbons physically activated in one or two steps for CH4/CO2 separation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 122-133.
    5. Fernando Rubiera & Carlos Córdoba & Tamara Pena & Marta G. Plaza, 2024. "Production of Sustainable Adsorbents for CO 2 Capture Applications from Food Biowastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Xia Liu & Juntao Wei & Wei Huo & Guangsuo Yu, 2017. "Gasification under CO 2 –Steam Mixture: Kinetic Model Study Based on Shared Active Sites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    7. Zhang, Fengyuan & Wang, Xiaolin & Lou, Xia & Lipiński, Wojciech, 2021. "The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride on the kinetics of CO2 hydrate formation in the presence of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide for carbon capture applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Zheng, Bobo & Xu, Jiuping & Ni, Ting & Li, Meihui, 2015. "Geothermal energy utilization trends from a technological paradigm perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 430-441.
    9. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Sarah Hamdy & Francisco Moser & Tatiana Morosuk & George Tsatsaronis, 2019. "Exergy-Based and Economic Evaluation of Liquefaction Processes for Cryogenics Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Kai Lei & Buqing Ye & Jin Cao & Rui Zhang & Dong Liu, 2017. "Combustion Characteristics of Single Particles from Bituminous Coal and Pine Sawdust in O 2 /N 2 , O 2 /CO 2 , and O 2 /H 2 O Atmospheres," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2017. "Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1068-1080.
    13. Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Wang, Jianhui & Chen, Laijun & Mei, Shengwei & Yuan, Tiejiang, 2016. "Robust environmental-economic dispatch incorporating wind power generation and carbon capture plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 674-684.
    14. Daniele Basso & Elsa Weiss-Hortala & Francesco Patuzzi & Marco Baratieri & Luca Fiori, 2018. "In Deep Analysis on the Behavior of Grape Marc Constituents during Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Wil Burns & Simon Nicholson, 2017. "Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 527-534, December.
    16. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Xie, Teng & Yao, Zonglu & Huo, Lili & Jia, Jixiu & Zhang, Peizhen & Tian, Liwei & Zhao, Lixin, 2023. "Characteristics of biochar derived from the co-pyrolysis of corn stalk and mulch film waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    18. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Motasem Y. D. Alazaiza & Ahmed Albahnasawi & Murat Eyvaz & Tahra Al Maskari & Dia Eddin Nassani & Salem S. Abu Amr & Mohammed Shadi S. Abujazar & Mohammed J. K. Bashir, 2023. "An Overview of Green Bioprocessing of Algae-Derived Biochar and Biopolymers: Synthesis, Preparation, and Potential Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Onifade, Temitope Tunbi, 2016. "Hybrid renewable energy support policy in the power sector: The contracts for difference and capacity market case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 390-401.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:7:p:1748-:d:156026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.