IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p1941-d120067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilient Prosumer Scenario in a Changing Regulatory Environment—The UniRCon Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Sanduleac

    (Faculty of Power Engineering, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina Ciornei

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela Albu

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Lucian Toma

    (Faculty of Power Engineering, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marta Sturzeanu

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • João F. Martins

    (Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

Technological developments are pushing for new solutions based upon massive integration of renewable electricity generation in networks already facing many challenges. This paper presents a novel approach to managing the energy transfer towards prosumers making use of smart management of local energy storage. The proposed design (including storage dimensioning) is based on several operating scenarios in which the prosumer might operate as: (i) a “ load only ” entity (from a grid perspective), thus exhibiting investment resiliency against regulatory changes and high energy efficiency; or (ii) a prosumer, in case regulatory opportunistic profit might be available. This can be realized within a newly proposed Uni-directional Resilient Consumer (UniRCon) architecture. The major aim of the proposed architecture is to achieve optimal self-consumption while avoiding curtailment even in a changing regulatory environment like, for example, the total lack of incentives for generation based on renewable energy sources (RES). One of the major advantages of the proposed architecture consists in the adaptability to changes in the regulatory and market environment. The term resilience is used with multiple meanings: (a) the prosumer’s financial resilience against regulatory changes when investment calculations assume no-grid injections; (b) the prosumer’s technical resilience, with electrical design based on standalone operation; (c) the resilience of clusters of interconnected end-user installations with enabled community-level electricity exchange, independent of the existing main grid supply; (d) the contribution to grid resilience, by enabling AC microgrid (MG) operation in island mode when large portions of the grid are formed by clusters of UniRCon prosumers (the ease of islanding segmentation of the local grid in case of emergencies). For proof of concept, three use-cases are detailed: (i) photovoltaic (PV) installations connected behind the meter; (ii) PV and storage available and controllable behind the meter; and (iii) the UniRCon architecture. The three use-cases are then compared and assessed for four near-future timelines as starting points for the investment. Numerical simulations show the attractiveness of the UniRCon solution in what concerns both system operation costs and supply resilience. Savings are expressed as opportunity savings arising from difference in tariffs while charging and discharging the storage unit and due to the avoidance of curtailment, as well as special taxes for the connection of PV (depending on regulatory environment). An extension of the UniRCon concept is presented also at community scale, with neighbourhood energy exchange inside a resilient cluster.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Sanduleac & Irina Ciornei & Mihaela Albu & Lucian Toma & Marta Sturzeanu & João F. Martins, 2017. "Resilient Prosumer Scenario in a Changing Regulatory Environment—The UniRCon Solution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1941-:d:120067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Axel Gautier & Julien Jacqmin & Jean-Christophe Poudou, 2018. "The prosumers and the grid," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 100-126, February.
    2. Ang Sha & Marco Aiello, 2016. "A Novel Strategy for Optimising Decentralised Energy Exchange for Prosumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Rodrigo Verschae & Takekazu Kato & Takashi Matsuyama, 2016. "Energy Management in Prosumer Communities: A Coordinated Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Georgios C. Christoforidis & Ioannis P. Panapakidis & Theofilos A. Papadopoulos & Grigoris K. Papagiannis & Ioannis Koumparou & Maria Hadjipanayi & George E. Georghiou, 2016. "A Model for the Assessment of Different Net-Metering Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Nobre, André M. & Severiano, Carlos A. & Karthik, Shravan & Kubis, Marek & Zhao, Lu & Martins, Fernando R. & Pereira, Enio B. & Rüther, Ricardo & Reindl, Thomas, 2016. "PV power conversion and short-term forecasting in a tropical, densely-built environment in Singapore," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 496-509.
    6. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Somi Jung & Dongwoo Kim, 2017. "Pareto-Efficient Capacity Planning for Residential Photovoltaic Generation and Energy Storage with Demand-Side Load Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Nan Zhou & Nian Liu & Jianhua Zhang & Jinyong Lei, 2016. "Multi-Objective Optimal Sizing for Battery Storage of PV-Based Microgrid with Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Wade, N.S. & Taylor, P.C. & Lang, P.D. & Jones, P.R., 2010. "Evaluating the benefits of an electrical energy storage system in a future smart grid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7180-7188, November.
    10. Holger C. Hesse & Rodrigo Martins & Petr Musilek & Maik Naumann & Cong Nam Truong & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "Curtailment in a Highly Renewable Power System and Its Effect on Capacity Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2016. "Prosumer bidding and scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 828-843.
    13. Zhongwen Li & Chuanzhi Zang & Peng Zeng & Haibin Yu, 2016. "Combined Two-Stage Stochastic Programming and Receding Horizon Control Strategy for Microgrid Energy Management Considering Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federica Cucchiella & Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi, 2017. "The Economic Feasibility of Residential Energy Storage Combined with PV Panels: The Role of Subsidies in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Jurasz, Jakub & Dąbek, Paweł B. & Kaźmierczak, Bartosz & Kies, Alexander & Wdowikowski, Marcin, 2018. "Large scale complementary solar and wind energy sources coupled with pumped-storage hydroelectricity for Lower Silesia (Poland)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 183-192.
    3. Héctor Marañón-Ledesma & Asgeir Tomasgard, 2019. "Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Miguel Manuel de Villena & Raphael Fonteneau & Axel Gautier & Damien Ernst, 2019. "Evaluating the Evolution of Distribution Networks under Different Regulatory Frameworks with Multi-Agent Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Schyska, Bruno U. & Kies, Alexander, 2020. "How regional differences in cost of capital influence the optimal design of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Javier Parra-Domínguez & Esteban Sánchez & Ángel Ordóñez, 2023. "The Prosumer: A Systematic Review of the New Paradigm in Energy and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-44, July.
    7. Faia, Ricardo & Lezama, Fernando & Soares, João & Pinto, Tiago & Vale, Zita, 2024. "Local electricity markets: A review on benefits, barriers, current trends and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    8. Peter Cappers & Andrew Satchwell & Will Gorman & Javier Reneses, 2019. "Financial Impacts of Net-Metered Distributed PV on a Prototypical Western Utility’s Shareholders and Ratepayers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Kies, Alexander & Schyska, Bruno U. & Bilousova, Mariia & El Sayed, Omar & Jurasz, Jakub & Stoecker, Horst, 2021. "Critical review of renewable generation datasets and their implications for European power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Khezri, Rahmat & Mahmoudi, Amin & Aki, Hirohisa, 2022. "Optimal planning of solar photovoltaic and battery storage systems for grid-connected residential sector: Review, challenges and new perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Michas, Serafeim & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Papadelis, Sotiris & Flamos, Alexandros, 2020. "A transdisciplinary modeling framework for the participatory design of dynamic adaptive policy pathways," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Madeleine McPherson & Theofilos Sotiropoulos-Michalakakos & LD Danny Harvey & Bryan Karney, 2017. "An Open-Access Web-Based Tool to Access Global, Hourly Wind and Solar PV Generation Time-Series Derived from the MERRA Reanalysis Dataset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Khalilpour, Kaveh R. & Lusis, Peter, 2020. "Network capacity charge for sustainability and energy equity: A model-based analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Jiaxin Lu & Weijun Wang & Yingchao Zhang & Song Cheng, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System Using Entropy Weight Method Based on HOMER," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Dimitar Bozalakov & Mohannad J. Mnati & Joannes Laveyne & Jan Desmet & Lieven Vandevelde, 2019. "Battery Storage Integration in Voltage Unbalance and Overvoltage Mitigation Control Strategies and Its Impact on the Power Quality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Megan Culler & Hannah Burroughs, 2021. "Cybersecurity Considerations for Grid-Connected Batteries with Hardware Demonstrations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Nian Liu & Cheng Wang & Minyang Cheng & Jie Wang, 2016. "A Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimal Scheduling for Interconnected Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Blarke, Morten B., 2012. "Towards an intermittency-friendly energy system: Comparing electric boilers and heat pumps in distributed cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 349-365.
    19. Agga, Ali & Abbou, Ahmed & Labbadi, Moussa & El Houm, Yassine, 2021. "Short-term self consumption PV plant power production forecasts based on hybrid CNN-LSTM, ConvLSTM models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-112.
    20. Ghorbanzadeh, Milad & Astaneh, Majid & Golzar, Farzin, 2019. "Long-term degradation based analysis for lithium-ion batteries in off-grid wind-battery renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1194-1206.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1941-:d:120067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.