IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v376y2024ipas0306261924014740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the growth of Singapore's solar electricity capacity towards Green Plan 2030 targets and beyond using system dynamics modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Khoong, Wei Kit
  • Bellam, Sreenivasulu

Abstract

Having no native energy resources of fossil fuels, with poor wind resource and scarcity of land, the Solar Photovoltaic (PV) roadmap identified solar electricity as the most feasible source of renewable energy for Singapore's energy mix and supply. Moving towards net-zero emissions and to combat climate change, the Singapore government is aiming to achieve 2-Gigawatt-peak (GWp) of solar electricity target by 2030. Accordingly, the share of solar energy in the national grid is targeted to be between ∼2–6% in 2030 and ∼ 3.5–8% in 2040, and carbon emission savings to be ∼0.5–1.4 and ∼ 0.8–2.1 million tonnes per annum in 2030 and 2040 respectively. Although these ambitious targets align with the government's plans for mitigating emissions, Singapore faces great challenge in terms of land availability to install ground-mounted solar PV panels. In this paper, a system dynamics model is developed to study- to what extent can Singapore achieve the targeted solar electricity goals by 2030 or even beyond based on Green Plan 2030, what policies can be identified to achieve these targets, and how much carbon savings can be achieved through Solar electricity deployment. Accordingly, this paper presents systems thinking and system dynamics (ST&SD) methodology to model the growth of Singapore's solar capacity, carbon emission savings and share of electricity demand met by solar electricity while focusing on key complex factors such as area utilisation, subsidies, PV panel efficiency etc. Results of our model simulations and projections, based on the key data and assumptions, and policy scenarios show that Singapore's solar capacity can be accelerated by the implementation of the proposed policies to reach 2GWp goal towards 2030 or even slightly ahead of this timeline. However, should the government revise its solar capacity targets higher for the years past 2030 i.e. to achieve 8% share of total electricity generation, perhaps by 2040, policies such as an increased area utilisation, subsidies and higher panel efficiency need to be introduced. Our model simulations incorporating and evaluating these policy scenarios yielded the results aligning with the projections mentioned above. The results and insights presented in this paper offer useful recommendations to the researchers and policy makers in the field of solar electricity system in Singapore, and to study further for better policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Khoong, Wei Kit & Bellam, Sreenivasulu, 2024. "Evaluating the growth of Singapore's solar electricity capacity towards Green Plan 2030 targets and beyond using system dynamics modelling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:376:y:2024:i:pa:s0306261924014740
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924014740
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loh, Jiong Rui & Bellam, Sreenivasulu, 2024. "Towards net zero: Evaluating energy security in Singapore using system dynamics modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    2. Hall, Charles A.S. & Lambert, Jessica G. & Balogh, Stephen B., 2014. "EROI of different fuels and the implications for society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 141-152.
    3. Lu, Yujie & Chang, Ruidong & Shabunko, Veronika & Lay Yee, Amy Tan, 2019. "The implementation of building-integrated photovoltaics in Singapore: drivers versus barriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 400-408.
    4. Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan & Seong, Baek Seo, 2010. "How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2216-2224, May.
    5. Dupont, Elise & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2018. "Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 322-338.
    6. Costa, Alberto & Ng, Tsan Sheng & Su, Bin, 2023. "Long-term solar PV planning: An economic-driven robust optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    7. Nobre, André M. & Severiano, Carlos A. & Karthik, Shravan & Kubis, Marek & Zhao, Lu & Martins, Fernando R. & Pereira, Enio B. & Rüther, Ricardo & Reindl, Thomas, 2016. "PV power conversion and short-term forecasting in a tropical, densely-built environment in Singapore," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 496-509.
    8. Ang, B.W. & Choong, W.L. & Ng, T.S., 2015. "A framework for evaluating Singapore’s energy security," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 314-325.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    2. Jean-François Fagnart & Marc Germain & Benjamin Peeters, 2020. "Can the Energy Transition Be Smooth? A General Equilibrium Approach to the EROEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    3. Carlos de Castro & Iñigo Capellán-Pérez, 2020. "Standard, Point of Use, and Extended Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) from Comprehensive Material Requirements of Present Global Wind, Solar, and Hydro Power Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-43, June.
    4. Charles A. S. Hall, 2022. "The 50th Anniversary of The Limits to Growth : Does It Have Relevance for Today’s Energy Issues?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Roger Samsó & Júlia Crespin & Antonio García-Olivares & Jordi Solé, 2023. "Examining the Potential of Marine Renewable Energy: A Net Energy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    6. Loh, Jiong Rui & Bellam, Sreenivasulu, 2024. "Towards net zero: Evaluating energy security in Singapore using system dynamics modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    7. Victor Court, 2019. "An Estimation of Different Minimum Exergy Return Ratios Required for Society," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Roberto Leonardo Rana & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Pasquale Giungato & Caterina Tricase, 2020. "Trends in Scientific Literature on Energy Return Ratio of Renewable Energy Sources for Supporting Policymakers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Emmanuel Aramendia & Paul E. Brockway & Peter G. Taylor & Jonathan B. Norman & Matthew K. Heun & Zeke Marshall, 2024. "Estimation of useful-stage energy returns on investment for fossil fuels and implications for renewable energy systems," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 803-816, July.
    10. Dehghan, Hamed & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Nahavandi, Nasim, 2021. "A system dynamics model to analyze future electricity supply and demand in Iran under alternative pricing policies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Liu, Yang & Pedrycz, Witold & Deveci, Muhammet & Chen, Zhen-Song, 2024. "BIM-based building performance assessment of green buildings - A case study from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    12. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Agga, Ali & Abbou, Ahmed & Labbadi, Moussa & El Houm, Yassine, 2021. "Short-term self consumption PV plant power production forecasts based on hybrid CNN-LSTM, ConvLSTM models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-112.
    14. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-ming, 2012. "Prediction of China's coal production-environmental pollution based on a hybrid genetic algorithm-system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 521-529.
    15. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Zeng, Shouzhen & Streimikiene, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas, 2017. "Review of and comparative assessment of energy security in Baltic States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-192.
    17. Li, Pin & He, Qi & Zhang, Jinsuo & Xia, Qiyuan, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of energy synergy and renewable energy generation on energy security: Empirical evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    18. Tiziano Gomiero, 2015. "Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.
    19. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    20. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:376:y:2024:i:pa:s0306261924014740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.