IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p835-d102334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Holger C. Hesse

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Rodrigo Martins

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Petr Musilek

    (Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
    Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University Ostrava, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Maik Naumann

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Cong Nam Truong

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Andreas Jossen

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Battery energy storage systems (BESS) coupled with rooftop-mounted residential photovoltaic (PV) generation, designated as PV-BESS, draw increasing attention and market penetration as more and more such systems become available. The manifold BESS deployed to date rely on a variety of different battery technologies, show a great variation of battery size, and power electronics dimensioning. However, given today’s high investment costs of BESS, a well-matched design and adequate sizing of the storage systems are prerequisites to allow profitability for the end-user. The economic viability of a PV-BESS depends also on the battery operation, storage technology, and aging of the system. In this paper, a general method for comprehensive PV-BESS techno-economic analysis and optimization is presented and applied to the state-of-art PV-BESS to determine its optimal parameters. Using a linear optimization method, a cost-optimal sizing of the battery and power electronics is derived based on solar energy availability and local demand. At the same time, the power flow optimization reveals the best storage operation patterns considering a trade-off between energy purchase, feed-in remuneration, and battery aging. Using up to date technology-specific aging information and the investment cost of battery and inverter systems, three mature battery chemistries are compared; a lead-acid (PbA) system and two lithium-ion systems, one with lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) and another with lithium-nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) cathode. The results show that different storage technology and component sizing provide the best economic performances, depending on the scenario of load demand and PV generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Holger C. Hesse & Rodrigo Martins & Petr Musilek & Maik Naumann & Cong Nam Truong & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:835-:d:102334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Grosspietsch, David & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2013. "A review and probabilistic model of lifecycle costs of stationary batteries in multiple applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 240-250.
    2. Merei, Ghada & Moshövel, Janina & Magnor, Dirk & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2016. "Optimization of self-consumption and techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in commercial applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-178.
    3. Björn Nykvist & Måns Nilsson, 2015. "Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 329-332, April.
    4. Hoppmann, Joern & Volland, Jonas & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2014. "The economic viability of battery storage for residential solar photovoltaic systems – A review and a simulation model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1101-1118.
    5. Omar, Noshin & Monem, Mohamed Abdel & Firouz, Yousef & Salminen, Justin & Smekens, Jelle & Hegazy, Omar & Gaulous, Hamid & Mulder, Grietus & Van den Bossche, Peter & Coosemans, Thierry & Van Mierlo, J, 2014. "Lithium iron phosphate based battery – Assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1575-1585.
    6. Beck, T. & Kondziella, H. & Huard, G. & Bruckner, T., 2016. "Assessing the influence of the temporal resolution of electrical load and PV generation profiles on self-consumption and sizing of PV-battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 331-342.
    7. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holger C. Hesse & Michael Schimpe & Daniel Kucevic & Andreas Jossen, 2017. "Lithium-Ion Battery Storage for the Grid—A Review of Stationary Battery Storage System Design Tailored for Applications in Modern Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-42, December.
    2. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    3. Lahnaoui, Amin & Stenzel, Peter & Linssen, Jochen, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic battery system configuration and location☆," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 497-505.
    4. Rodrigo Martins & Holger C. Hesse & Johanna Jungbauer & Thomas Vorbuchner & Petr Musilek, 2018. "Optimal Component Sizing for Peak Shaving in Battery Energy Storage System for Industrial Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Schram, Wouter L. & Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 69-81.
    6. Nina Munzke & Felix Büchle & Anna Smith & Marc Hiller, 2021. "Influence of Efficiency, Aging and Charging Strategy on the Economic Viability and Dimensioning of Photovoltaic Home Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-46, November.
    7. Resch, Matthias & Bühler, Jochen & Klausen, Mira & Sumper, Andreas, 2017. "Impact of operation strategies of large scale battery systems on distribution grid planning in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1042-1063.
    8. Koskela, Juha & Rautiainen, Antti & Järventausta, Pertti, 2019. "Using electrical energy storage in residential buildings – Sizing of battery and photovoltaic panels based on electricity cost optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1175-1189.
    9. Carlos J. Sarasa-Maestro & Rodolfo Dufo-López & José L. Bernal-Agustín, 2016. "Analysis of Photovoltaic Self-Consumption Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Azuatalam, Donald & Paridari, Kaveh & Ma, Yiju & Förstl, Markus & Chapman, Archie C. & Verbič, Gregor, 2019. "Energy management of small-scale PV-battery systems: A systematic review considering practical implementation, computational requirements, quality of input data and battery degradation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 555-570.
    11. Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio & Cocco, Daniele, 2018. "Use of weather forecast for increasing the self-consumption rate of home solar systems: An Italian case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 746-758.
    12. Kalkbrenner, Bernhard J., 2019. "Residential vs. community battery storage systems – Consumer preferences in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1355-1363.
    13. Müller, Simon C. & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "Sharing electricity storage at the community level: An empirical analysis of potential business models and barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 492-503.
    14. Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Ivan Bolis & Gianfranco Chicco & Andrea Mazza & Karel Janda, 2021. "Economic Analysis of the Investments in Battery Energy Storage Systems: Review and Current Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    15. Bai, Bo & Xiong, Siqin & Song, Bo & Xiaoming, Ma, 2019. "Economic analysis of distributed solar photovoltaics with reused electric vehicle batteries as energy storage systems in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 213-229.
    16. Han, Xuejiao & Garrison, Jared & Hug, Gabriela, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in Switzerland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Economic viability of battery energy storage and grid strategy: A special case of China electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 423-434.
    18. Pena-Bello, A. & Barbour, E. & Gonzalez, M.C. & Patel, M.K. & Parra, D., 2019. "Optimized PV-coupled battery systems for combining applications: Impact of battery technology and geography," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 978-990.
    19. Nyholm, Emil & Goop, Joel & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2016. "Solar photovoltaic-battery systems in Swedish households – Self-consumption and self-sufficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 148-159.
    20. Oliva H., Sebastian & Passey, Rob & Abdullah, Md Abu, 2019. "A semi-empirical financial assessment of combining residential photovoltaics, energy efficiency and battery storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 206-214.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:835-:d:102334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.