IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i1p20-d1567267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disentangling the Pros and Cons of Flexible Work Arrangements: Curvilinear Effects on Individual and Organizational Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Petitta

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Valerio Ghezzi

    (Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The use of flexible work arrangements (e.g., remote, hybrid) has spread during the pandemic and cumulative studies provide mixed findings on the positive vs. negative consequences of these working methods for employees and organizations. The present study examined the potentially curvilinear effects of employees’ attitude towards flexible work options (i.e., flexible work orientation; FWO) on individual- (i.e., performance, job satisfaction, stress, work-to-family conflict, family-to-work conflict) and organization-related outcomes (i.e., organizational social support, organizational justice, affective organizational commitment). Anonymous survey data were collected in 2021 from 1061 in-person and flexible workers nested within 100 Italian organizations. Measurement invariance across the two subsamples was supported and subsequent structural model analyses suggested a differential pattern of results for in-person and flexible workers. Results indicated a curvilinear U-shaped relationship between FWO and organizational support, justice, commitment and job satisfaction for the in-person subsample as compared to a positive linear relationship for flexible workers. Moreover, in both samples of flexible and in-presence workers, FWO exerted a positive linear effect on performance and a mainly negative linear effect on stress, WFC and FWC. Overall, flexible workers displayed linear relationships among all the study variables, whereas in-person workers showed the curvilinear effects of FWO on support, justice, commitment and satisfaction, all of which increased at high levels of employees’ positive attitude towards FWO. Results are discussed in light of the globally elevated rates of flexible work arrangements and mixed findings on their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Petitta & Valerio Ghezzi, 2025. "Disentangling the Pros and Cons of Flexible Work Arrangements: Curvilinear Effects on Individual and Organizational Outcomes," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:20-:d:1567267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/1/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/1/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ella Hafermalz & Kai Riemer, 2021. "Productive and connected while working from home: what client-facing remote workers can learn from telenurses about ‘belonging through technology’," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 89-99, January.
    2. Groen, Bianca A.C. & van Triest, Sander P. & Coers, Michael & Wtenweerde, Neeke, 2018. "Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 727-735.
    3. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena, 2016. "Dual Labor Market," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-3.
    4. Kolasa, Marcin & Rubaszek, Michał & Walerych, Małgorzata, 2021. "Do flexible working hours amplify or stabilize unemployment fluctuations?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Mihaela-Emilia Marica, 2019. "On call (zero-hour) contractual arrangements: a new form of employment. Elements of compared law," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 70-78, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soga, Lebene Richmond & Bolade-Ogunfodun, Yemisi & Mariani, Marcello & Nasr, Rita & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 648-662.
    2. Downes, Rebecca & Daellenbach, Urs & Donnelly, Noelle, 2023. "Remote control: Attitude monitoring and informal control in distributed teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Rujin, Svetlana, 2024. "Labor market institutions and technology-induced labor adjustment along the extensive and intensive margins," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Emilio Bisetti & Benjamin Tengelsen & Ariel Zetlin‐Jones, 2022. "Moral Hazard In Remote Teams," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1595-1623, November.
    5. Tomasz Chmielewski & Andrzej Kocięcki & Tomasz Łyziak & Jan Przystupa & Ewa Stanisławska & Małgorzata Walerych & Ewa Wróbel, 2020. "Monetary policy transmission mechanism in Poland What do we know in 2019?," NBP Working Papers 329, Narodowy Bank Polski.
    6. Ivan D. Trofimov, 2024. "Is Business Cycle Gender Neutral? An Analysis of Aggregate and Sectoral Working Hours in Canadian Economy," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 164-194, September.
    7. Andrei Georgian & Militaru Gheorghe, 2022. "The influence of telework on organizational performance: Evidence from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 887-893, August.
    8. Noritaka Kudoh & Hiroaki Miyamoto, 2021. "General Equilibrium Effects and Labor Market Fluctuations," Working Papers SDES-2021-4, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised May 2021.
    9. Christoph Weinert & Tim Weitzel, 2023. "Teleworking in the Covid-19 Pandemic," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 309-328, June.
    10. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & Munaza Bibi & Zhang Yu & Syed Muhammad Ahsan Rizvi, 2021. "The Economic and Social Impact of Teleworking in Romania: Present Practices and Post Pandemic Developments," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 787-787, August.
    11. Mabel Andalon & Matthew Jones, 2022. "A simple model of working from home," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 25(2), pages 193-214.
    12. Oksana Tokarchuk & Roberto Gabriele & Giorgio Neglia, 2021. "Teleworking during the Covid-19 Crisis in Italy: Evidence and Tentative Interpretations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Krzysztof Kubiak & Agata Branowska, 2021. "The Concept of Improvements in Management of Public Administration Officials Working from Home in Selected Educational Units," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 257-268.
    14. Hicham El Ouazzani & Hicham Ouakil & Abdelhamid Moustabchir, 2024. "Monetary Policy and Unemployment in Morocco: A DSGE Model Approach with Labor Market Frictions and Nash Wage Bargaining," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(4), pages 823-850, December.
    15. Clara Laborie & Nathalie Bernard & Emmanuel Abord-De-Chatillon, 2021. "Bien-Être En Télétravail : A-T-On Vraiment Besoin D'Un Manager ?," Post-Print hal-04466256, HAL.
    16. Carmen-Alexandra Stoian & Chirața Caraiani & Ionuț Florin Anica-Popa & Cornelia Dascălu & Camelia Iuliana Lungu, 2022. "Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Janusz Rymaniak & Katarzyna Lis & Vida Davidavičienė & Manuela Pérez-Pérez & Ángel Martínez-Sánchez, 2021. "From Stationary to Remote: Employee Risks at Pandemic Migration of Workplaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Teresa Cuerdo-Vilches & Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín & Ignacio Oteiza, 2021. "Working from Home: Is Our Housing Ready?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-28, July.
    19. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2023. "Do general equilibrium effects matter for labor market dynamics?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pendyala, Ram M., 2023. "On modeling future workplace location decisions: An analysis of Texas employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:20-:d:1567267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.