IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v10y2022i10p245-d936712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Leadership Behavior on Entrepreneurship in State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from Civil Servant Management Aimed at Improving Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Dao T. T. Thuy

    (Faculty of Politics, Vietnam Youth Academy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Truong Quoc Viet

    (Faculty of Administration, Hanoi University of Internal Affairs, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Vu Van Phuc

    (Scientific Council of Central Party Organizations, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi-Hong-Diep Pham

    (Faculty of Political Economy, VNU University of Economics and Business, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan

    (Faculty of Politics, Vietnam Youth Academy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Huong Ho

    (Faculty of Politics, Vietnam Youth Academy, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

This paper systematizes the theoretical foundation and empirical evidence of the impact of leadership behavior on entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises, and the difference between state-owned enterprises that applied management based on the accountability of leaders, and those that did not. The paper uses the OLS regression model to identify the impact of leadership behavior on the entrepreneurship of state-owned enterprises by using data from a survey of 259 civil servants in Vietnamese state-owned enterprises. In our sample, 109 respondents belonged to the category of state-owned enterprises that did not apply management based on accountability, and 140 were state-owned enterprises that applied management based on accountability. The findings show that leadership behavior has a positive impact on the entrepreneurship of state-owned enterprises that do and do not apply management based on accountability, with results of 0.305 and 0.022, respectively. Moreover, the regression model is used to identify the factors that influence leadership behavior, including vision and wage policy having a statistical significance and positive impact on the leadership behaviors in all the state-owned enterprises. Additionally, some factors, including policy building, hi-tech usage, culture, teamwork, and training policy have positive impacts on leadership behavior in Model 1, and encouragement, monitoring, responsibility, and recruitment policy had positive impacts in Model 2 among the state enterprises. Additionally, this paper recommends some policies to promote leadership behavior in state enterprises in Vietnam.

Suggested Citation

  • Dao T. T. Thuy & Truong Quoc Viet & Vu Van Phuc & Thi-Hong-Diep Pham & Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan & Huong Ho, 2022. "Impact of Leadership Behavior on Entrepreneurship in State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from Civil Servant Management Aimed at Improving Accountability," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:245-:d:936712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/10/245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/10/245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-11-2016-0118 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anne Strand Alfredsen Larsen & Gro Holst Volden & Bjørn Andersen, 2021. "Project Governance in State-Owned Enterprises: The Case of Major Public Projects’ Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Schemes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Roberts, John & Scapens, Robert, 1985. "Accounting systems and systems of accountability -- understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 443-456, October.
    4. Schwarzmüller, Tanja & Brosi, Prisca & Duman, Denis & Welpe, Isabell M., 2018. "How Does the Digital Transformation Affect Organizations? Key Themes of Change in Work Design and Leadership," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(2), pages 114-138.
    5. Elinor Ostrom, 2005. "Unlocking Public Entrepreneurship and Public Economies," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2005-01, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Salaheldin Ismail Salaheldin, 2009. "Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 215-237, March.
    7. Katarina Valaskova & Pavol Durana & Peter Adamko & Jaroslav Jaros, 2020. "Financial Compass for Slovak Enterprises: Modeling Economic Stability of Agricultural Entities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Shirel Damti & Guy Hochman, 2022. "Personality Characteristics as Predictors of the Leader’s Ethical Leadership in Regular Times and in Times of Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Stefania Zerbinati & Vangelis Souitaris, 2005. "Entrepreneurship in the public sector: a framework of analysis in European local governments," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 43-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adelaida Ojeda-Beltrán & Andrés Solano-Barliza & Wilson Arrubla-Hoyos & Danny Daniel Ortega & Dora Cama-Pinto & Juan Antonio Holgado-Terriza & Miguel Damas & Gilberto Toscano-Vanegas & Alejandro Cama-, 2023. "Characterisation of Youth Entrepreneurship in Medellín-Colombia Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Farzana Chowdhury, 2021. "Entrepreneurship in public organizations: the role of leadership behavior," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1107-1123, October.
    2. Vassili Joannides & N. Berland, 2008. "Grounded theory: quels usages dans les recherches en contrôle de gestion?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00676580, HAL.
    3. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    4. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 234-244.
    5. Jensen, Mads Langballe & Agyemang, Gloria & Lehman, Cheryl R., 2021. "Accountabilities, invisibilities and silences in a Danish slave trading company on the Gold Coast in the early 18th century," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Barbara Ofstad & Anne Bartel-Radic, 2024. "Cooperative learning through boundary spanning: how a corporate learning department ensures that trainers and content stay current," Post-Print hal-04671811, HAL.
    7. Reza Dabestani & Allahvirdi Taghavi & Mohammad Saljoughian, 2014. "The Relationship between Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Service Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(1), pages 81-101, February.
    8. Ioanna Giannoukou, 2023. "Personality Traits and Charismatic Leader: An Innovative Perspective on Leadership," Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 6(1), pages 105-125.
    9. repec:unu:wpaper:wp2012-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Carnes, Christina Matz & Gilstrap, Frank E. & Hitt, Michael A. & Ireland, R. Duane & Matz, Jack W. & Woodman, Richard W., 2019. "Transforming a traditional research organization through public entrepreneurship," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 437-449.
    11. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    12. Roman Vavrek & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2021. "Evaluating the Financial Health of Agricultural Enterprises in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic Using Bankruptcy Models," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Neomi Frisch-Aviram & Nissim Cohen & Itai Beeri, 2018. "Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 39-57, March.
    14. Rahiem, Maila D.H., 2021. "Remaining motivated despite the limitations: University students’ learning propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Vassili Joannides, 2012. "Accounterability and the problematics of accountability," Post-Print hal-00676561, HAL.
    16. Sofia Yasmin & Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2014. "Communicated Accountability by Faith-Based Charity Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 103-123, June.
    17. Maren Gierlich-Joas & Thomas Hess & Rahild Neuburger, 2020. "More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 921-947, November.
    18. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    19. Huguette Blanco & John Lennard & Sylvain Lamontagne, 2011. "Annual Reporting and Accountability by Municipalities in Canada: An Empirical Investigation," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 195-224, September.
    20. Ahrens, Thomas & Mollona, Massimiliano, 2007. "Organisational control as cultural practice--A shop floor ethnography of a Sheffield steel mill," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 305-331.
    21. Vassili Joannides & N. Berland, 2008. "Grounded theory: quels usages dans les recherches en contrôle de gestion?," Post-Print hal-00676580, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:10:p:245-:d:936712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.