IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v2y2022i3p38-539d904677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scoping Review Protocol of Technological Interventions for Vocational Inclusion of Individuals with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Hamideh Kerdar

    (Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, 44149 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Britta Marleen Kirchhoff

    (Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, 44149 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Liane Bächler

    (Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany)

  • Lars Adolph

    (Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, 44149 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

Technology could improve the vocational inclusion of people with disabilities, thus increasing their wellbeing and competence development. Moreover, societies could benefit from their skills and expertise. In this protocol, the objectives, structure, and further details of a scoping review on the subject of the vocational inclusion of people with disabilities via technologies are described. This article additionally demonstrates how a piloting phase can be used for the further development of the protocol. The focus of the proposed scoping review is disability, technology, and task/work. Expansive and specific keywords will be searched in APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, and CINAHL Complete via EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore. As regards the grey literature, ProQuest will be used for dissertations and theses and Google Scholar will be hand searched. Articles published in 2012–2022 focused on working-age adults will be exported to EndNote and titles/abstracts will be monitored. We further describe the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and charting strategies of the proposed scoping review. The results will be mapped and reported based on disability, technology, and task. For the improvement of the protocol, a pilot study in February 2022 was performed. The results from the pilot, briefly reported herein, led to a transparent and clear structure of the proposed scoping review.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Hamideh Kerdar & Britta Marleen Kirchhoff & Liane Bächler & Lars Adolph, 2022. "Scoping Review Protocol of Technological Interventions for Vocational Inclusion of Individuals with Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:38-539:d:904677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/3/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/3/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Litchfield & Cary Cooper & Christine Hancock & Patrick Watt, 2016. "Work and Wellbeing in the 21st Century," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Jesús Fernández-Gavira & Paola Espada-Goya & Virginia Alcaraz-Rodríguez & David Moscoso-Sánchez, 2021. "Design of Educational Tools Based on Traditional Games for the Improvement of Social and Personal Skills of Primary School Students with Hearing Impairment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiziana Marinaci & Claudio Russo & Giulia Savarese & Giovanna Stornaiuolo & Filomena Faiella & Luna Carpinelli & Marco Navarra & Giuseppina Marsico & Monica Mollo, 2023. "An Inclusive Workplace Approach to Disability through Assistive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lauren R. Gullett & Dana M. Alhasan & W. Braxton Jackson & Chandra L. Jackson, 2022. "Employment Industry and Occupational Class in Relation to Serious Psychological Distress in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Paul A. Schulte & Ivo Iavicoli & Luca Fontana & Stavroula Leka & Maureen F. Dollard & Acran Salmen-Navarro & Fernanda J. Salles & Kelly P. K. Olympio & Roberto Lucchini & Marilyn Fingerhut & Francesco, 2022. "Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-28, August.
    3. David. A. L. Coldwell, 2019. "Negative Influences of the 4th Industrial Revolution on the Workplace: Towards a Theoretical Model of Entropic Citizen Behavior in Toxic Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Marc A. W. Damen & Sarah I. Detaille & Josephine A. Engels & Annet H. De Lange, 2024. "Perceived Factors Influencing Blue-Collar Workers’ Participation in Worksite Health Promotion Programs in Freight Transport: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Kevin Daniels & David Watson & Cigdem Gedikli, 2017. "Well-Being and the Social Environment of Work: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Elvisa Drishti & Zamira Shkreli & Edvin Zhllima & Blendi Gerdoçi, 2023. "Deprivation, Social Mobility Considerations, and Life Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of 33 European Countries," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(3), pages 511-550, September.
    7. Stefano Toderi & Cristian Balducci, 2018. "Stress-Preventive Management Competencies, Psychosocial Work Environments, and Affective Well-Being: A Multilevel, Multisource Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Mary Grace M. Reyes & Celeste C. Marquez, 2024. "Personal Values and Work Competencies of Faculty in a State University: A Proposed Values Development Program," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 3454-3470, August.
    9. Sarah A. Felknor & Jessica M. K. Streit & Michelle McDaniel & Paul A. Schulte & L. Casey Chosewood & George L. Delclos & on behalf of the Workshop Presenters and Participants, 2021. "How Will the Future of Work Shape OSH Research and Practice? A Workshop Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Lawrence T Lam & Mary K Lam & Prasuna Reddy & Prudence Wong, 2022. "Factors Associated with Work-Related Burnout among Corporate Employees Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Haile, Getinet Astatike, 2023. "Precarious employment and workplace health outcomes in Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:3:p:38-539:d:904677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.