IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v4y2022i2p26-439d815157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wood Biochar Enhances the Valorisation of the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure

Author

Listed:
  • Tien Ngo

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia
    ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia)

  • Leadin S. Khudur

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia
    ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia)

  • Ibrahim Gbolahan Hakeem

    (ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
    School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Kalpit Shah

    (ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
    School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Aravind Surapaneni

    (ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
    South East Water, 101 Wells Street, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia)

  • Andrew S. Ball

    (School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia
    ARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia’s Biosolids Resource, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia)

Abstract

In this study, the efficacy of biochar to mitigate ammonia stress and improve methane production is investigated. Chicken manure (CM) was subjected to high-solid mesophilic anaerobic digestion (15% total solid content) with wood biochar (BC). Wood biochar was further treated using HNO 3 and NaOH to produce acid–alkali-treated wood biochar (TBC), with an improvement in its overall ammonium adsorption capacity and porosity. Three treatments were loaded in triplicate into the digesters, without biochar, with biochar and with acid–alkali-treated biochar and maintained at 37 °C for 110 days. The study found a significant improvement in CH 4 formation kinetics via enhanced substrate degradation, leading to CH 4 production of 74.7 mL g −1 VS and 70.1 mL g −1 VS by BC and TBC treatments, compared to 39.5 mL g −1 VS by control treatments on the 28th day, respectively. However, only the use of TBC was able to prolong methane production during the semi-inhibition phase. The use of TBC also resulted in the highest removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) of 86.3%. In addition, the treatment with TBC preserved the highest microbial biomass at day 110. The presence of TBC also resulted in an increase in electrical conductivity, possibly promoting DIET-mediated methanogenesis. Overall, the acid–alkali treatment of biochar can be a novel approach to improve biochar’s existing characteristics for its utilisation as an additive in anaerobic digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Tien Ngo & Leadin S. Khudur & Ibrahim Gbolahan Hakeem & Kalpit Shah & Aravind Surapaneni & Andrew S. Ball, 2022. "Wood Biochar Enhances the Valorisation of the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:26-439:d:815157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/2/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/4/2/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Lü, Fan & Liu, Yang & Shao, Liming & He, Pinjing, 2019. "Powdered biochar doubled microbial growth in anaerobic digestion of oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 605-614.
    3. Chen, Mei & Wang, Fang & Zhang, De-li & Yi, Wei-ming & Liu, Yi, 2021. "Effects of acid modification on the structure and adsorption NH4+-N properties of biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1343-1350.
    4. Liu, Hongbo & Wang, Xingkang & Fang, Yueying & Lai, Wenjia & Xu, Suyun & Lichtfouse, Eric, 2022. "Enhancing thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with biogas residue biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 465-475.
    5. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kegl, Tina, 2024. "Anaerobic digestion BioModel upgraded by various inhibition types," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Qin, Fanzhi & Zhang, Chen & Zeng, Guangming & Huang, Danlian & Tan, Xiaofei & Duan, Abing, 2022. "Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Liu, Yang & He, Pinjing & Duan, Haowen & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "Low calcium dosage favors methanation of long-chain fatty acids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    7. Tan, Lea Chua & Lin, Richen & Murphy, Jerry D. & Lens, Piet N.L., 2021. "Granular activated carbon supplementation enhances anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich wastewaters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 958-970.
    8. Yuhan Zhang & Yongbin Wang & Zhibin Chen & Chengzhi Hu & Jiuhui Qu, 2024. "Recovering nutrients and unblocking the cake layer of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Assessing the policy synergy among power, carbon emissions trading and tradable green certificate market mechanisms on strategic GENCOs in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.
    11. Irina N. Vikhareva & Guliya K. Aminova & Aliya K. Mazitova, 2022. "Resource Cycling: Application of Anaerobic Utilization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Thakur, Nandini & Jalalah, Mohammed & Alsareii, Saeed A. & Harraz, Farid A. & Almadiy, Abdulrhman A. & Su, Shaochen & Salama, El-Sayed & Li, Xiangkai, 2024. "Anaerobic digestion of fat, oil, and grease (FOG) under combined additives: Enhanced digestibility, biogas production, and microbiome," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Dobson, Alan D.W. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "Improved robustness of ex-situ biological methanation for electro-fuel production through the addition of graphene," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Turzyński, Tomasz & Kluska, Jacek & Kardaś, Dariusz, 2022. "Study on chicken manure combustion and heat production in terms of thermal self-sufficiency of a poultry farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 84-91.
    15. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Zhan, Yuanhang & Zhu, Jun, 2024. "Response surface methodology and artificial neural network-genetic algorithm for modeling and optimization of bioenergy production from biochar-improved anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    17. Mao, Chunlan & Wang, Yanbo & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin & Yuan, Liuyan & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Correlations between microbial community and C:N:P stoichiometry during the anaerobic digestion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 687-695.
    18. Li, Lei & Liu, Haoyu & Chen, Yongdong & Yang, Donghai & Cai, Chen & Yuan, Shijie & Dai, Xiaohu, 2022. "Effect of Magnet-Fe3O4 composite structure on methane production during anaerobic sludge digestion: Establishment of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 52-60.
    19. Vincenzo Torretta & Athanasia K. Tolkou & Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis & Francesca Maria Caccamo & Marco Carnevale Miino & Marco Baldi & Maria Cristina Collivignarelli, 2021. "Enhancement of Methanogenic Activity in Volumetrically Undersized Reactor by Mesophilic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Aqueous Residue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    20. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Krzysztof Pilarski & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Alicja Niewiadomska & Jacek Dach, 2024. "Additives Improving the Efficiency of Biogas Production as an Alternative Energy Source—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:26-439:d:815157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.