IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v226y2024ics0960148124004920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic digestion BioModel upgraded by various inhibition types

Author

Listed:
  • Kegl, Tina

Abstract

This work deals with numerical simulation of the anaerobic digestion process. Special attention is focused on the inhibitions modeling. For this purpose, an existing complex BioModel is upgraded by adequate modeling of non-competitive, competitive, and uncompetitive inhibition types. The obtained results of sensitivity analysis shows that various inhibition constants are ranged within the most important model parameters. For each inhibition type, the upgraded model is calibrated and validated with respect to the measured anaerobic digestion performance in CSTR bioreactors of a full scale biogas plant in period of two years. The obtained statistical indicators differ up to 5% in model calibration and validation. The best values of relative index of agreement for CH4 and H2S flow rates were obtained when using competitive inhibition; their values were 0.9385 and 0.7903, respectively. For H2 flow rate and pH value, the best indices of 0.7945 and 0.6593 were obtained with uncompetitive inhibition. For biogas flow rate, the best index of 0.9518 was obtained when using non-competitive inhibition. Since no inhibition type delivers best results in all situations, further research is needed to model mixed inhibition type for various inhibitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kegl, Tina, 2024. "Anaerobic digestion BioModel upgraded by various inhibition types," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:226:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124004920
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124004920
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Florides, Georgios & Tassou, Savvas A., 2014. "A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 701-714.
    2. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Liu, Hongbo & Wang, Xingkang & Fang, Yueying & Lai, Wenjia & Xu, Suyun & Lichtfouse, Eric, 2022. "Enhancing thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with biogas residue biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 465-475.
    4. Lovato, Giovanna & Kovalovszki, Adam & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Arjuna Jéglot, Arnaud Tristan & Rodrigues, José Alberto Domingues & Angelidaki, Irini, 2021. "Modelling bioaugmentation: Engineering intervention in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1080-1087.
    5. Abunde Neba, F. & Asiedu, Nana Y. & Addo, Ahmad & Morken, John & Østerhus, Stein W. & Seidu, Razak, 2019. "Use of attainable regions for synthesis and optimization of multistage anaerobic digesters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 334-350.
    6. Akindolire, Muyiwa Ajoke & Rama, Haripriya & Roopnarain, Ashira, 2022. "Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion: A critical evaluation of microorganisms and enzymes to drive the process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    8. Rahul Kadam & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jonghwa Lee & Jungyu Park, 2022. "Occurrence, Fate, and Implications of Heavy Metals during Anaerobic Digestion: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    2. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    3. Tien Ngo & Leadin S. Khudur & Ibrahim Gbolahan Hakeem & Kalpit Shah & Aravind Surapaneni & Andrew S. Ball, 2022. "Wood Biochar Enhances the Valorisation of the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Emebu, Samuel & Pecha, Jiří & Janáčová, Dagmar, 2022. "Review on anaerobic digestion models: Model classification & elaboration of process phenomena," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Maria-Athina Tsitsimpikou & Sotirios D. Kalamaras & Antonios A. Lithourgidis & Anastasios Mitsopoulos & Lars Ellegaard & Irini Angelidaki & Thomas A. Kotsopoulos, 2023. "Simulation of the Working Volume Reduction through the Bioconversion Model (BioModel) and Its Validation Using Biogas Plant Data for the Prediction of the Optimal Reactor Cleaning Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Li, Heng & Chen, Zheng & Fu, Dun & Wang, Yuanpeng & Zheng, Yanmei & Li, Qingbiao, 2020. "Improved ADM1 for modelling C, N, P fates in anaerobic digestion process of pig manure and optimization approaches to biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2330-2336.
    8. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Stephen Tangwe & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2022. "Comparison of the Prediction Accuracy of Total Viable Bacteria Counts in a Batch Balloon Digester Charged with Cow Manure: Multiple Linear Regression and Non-Linear Regression Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Trad, Zaineb & Fontaine, Jean-Pierre & Larroche, Christian & Vial, Christophe, 2016. "Multiscale mixing analysis and modeling of biohydrogen production by dark fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-282.
    11. Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Cata Saady, Noori M. & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Hydrogen production from biomass through integration of anaerobic digestion and biogas dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    12. Choong, Yee Yaw & Chou, Kian Weng & Norli, Ismail, 2018. "Strategies for improving biogas production of palm oil mill effluent (POME) anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2993-3006.
    13. James Darmey & Julius Cudjoe Ahiekpor & Satyanarayana Narra & Osei-Wusu Achaw & Herbert Fiifi Ansah, 2023. "Municipal Solid Waste Generation Trend and Bioenergy Recovery Potential: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Peng, Wei & Beggio, Giovanni & Pivato, Alberto & Zhang, Hua & Lü, Fan & He, Pinjing, 2022. "Applications of near infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging techniques in anaerobic digestion of bio-wastes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Owusu-Agyeman, I. & Bedaso, B. & Laumeyer, C. & Pan, C. & Malovanyy, A. & Baresel, C. & Plaza, E. & Cetecioglu, Z., 2023. "Volatile fatty acids production from municipal waste streams and use as a carbon source for denitrification: The journey towards full-scale application and revealing key microbial players," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Martinát, Stanislav & Navrátil, Josef & Dvořák, Petr & Van der Horst, Dan & Klusáček, Petr & Kunc, Josef & Frantál, Bohumil, 2016. "Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 85-97.
    17. Zarei, Sasan & Mousavi, Seyyed Mohammad & Amani, Teimour & Khamforoush, Mehrdad & Jafari, Arezou, 2021. "Three-dimensional CFD simulation of anaerobic reactions in a continuous packed-bed bioreactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 461-472.
    18. Kovalovszki, Adam & Treu, Laura & Ellegaard, Lars & Luo, Gang & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Modeling temperature response in bioenergy production: Novel solution to a common challenge of anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski & Marcin Zieliński, 2022. "Effect of Pharmaceutical Sludge Pre-Treatment with Fenton/Fenton-like Reagents on Toxicity and Anaerobic Digestion Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:226:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124004920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.