IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jbusin/v4y2024i3p20-330d1448381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Information Technology and Employee Engagement in Enhancing Knowledge Management in the Pharmaceutical Research and Development Process: Insights from Dynamic Capabilities Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Chatzifoti

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Eleni A. Didaskalou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Panos T. Chountalas

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Konstantina K. Agoraki

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

  • Dimitrios A. Georgakellos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of Information Technology and employee engagement on the implementation of Knowledge Management within the Research and Development processes of pharmaceutical companies. Based on Dynamic Capabilities Theory, this research examines the interaction between these factors in facilitating Knowledge Management practices. The findings indicate that while both Information Technology and employee engagement significantly enhance Knowledge Management implementation, the latter has a more pronounced effect. Engaged employees are crucial for identifying opportunities and driving strategic initiatives, whereas Information Technology supports information processing and decision making. This study highlights the complex interaction between technology and human creativity, demonstrating that the future of Knowledge Management in Research and Development relies not only on advanced systems but also on the active and committed individuals who utilize them.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Chatzifoti & Eleni A. Didaskalou & Panos T. Chountalas & Konstantina K. Agoraki & Dimitrios A. Georgakellos, 2024. "The Role of Information Technology and Employee Engagement in Enhancing Knowledge Management in the Pharmaceutical Research and Development Process: Insights from Dynamic Capabilities Theory," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:4:y:2024:i:3:p:20-330:d:1448381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/4/3/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/4/3/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F.B. Vernadat & F.T.S. Chan & A. Molina & S.Y. Nof & H. Panetto, 2018. "Information systems and knowledge management in industrial engineering: recent advances and new perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 2707-2713, April.
    2. Simon Rodan & Charles Galunic, 2004. "More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 541-562, June.
    3. Blichfeldt, Henrik & Faullant, Rita, 2021. "Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation – A process-industry perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Kevin Grant & Roman Matousek & Martin Meyer & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2020. "Research and development spending and technical efficiency: evidence from biotechnology and pharmaceutical sector," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(20), pages 6170-6184, October.
    5. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    6. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    7. M. Hurol Mete & Onder Belgin, 2022. "Impact of Knowledge Management Performance on the Efficiency of R&D Active Firms: Evidence from Turkey," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 830-848, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Der-Fang Hung, 2015. "Sustained Competitive Advantage and Organizational Inertia: The Cost Perspective of Knowledge Management," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 769-789, December.
    2. Pantic-Dragisic, Svjetlana & Söderlund, Jonas, 2020. "Swift transition and knowledge cycling: Key capabilities for successful technical and engineering consulting?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2008. "Variation in Experience and Team Familiarity: Addressing the Knowledge Acquisition-Application Problem," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-035, Harvard Business School.
    4. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    5. Vincent Chauvet, 2007. "Organizational learning within SME’s: a support to innovation [Une dynamique d'apprentissage organisationnel dans les PME technologiques : un soutien à l'innovation]," Post-Print halshs-01768355, HAL.
    6. Kotabe, Masaaki & Jiang, Crystal Xiangwen & Murray, Janet Y., 2011. "Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 166-176, April.
    7. André van Stel & Lorraine Uhlaner & Haibo Zhou & Valerie Duplat, 2012. "Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth," Scales Research Reports H201211, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    8. Jesse Karjalainen & Aku Valtakoski & Ilkka Kauranen, 2021. "Interfirm network structure and firm resources: Towards a unifying concept," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(3), pages 227-264.
    9. Zhang, Jing & Baden-Fuller, Charles & Mangematin, Vincent, 2007. "Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 515-528, May.
    10. Wadhwa, Anu & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2016. "Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 95-112.
    11. Dian Prihadyanti & Karlina Sari & Dudi Hidayat & Nur Laili & Budi Triyono & Chichi Shintia Laksani, 2022. "The Changing Nature of Expatriation: The Emerging Role of Knowledge Transfer Readiness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1496-1541, June.
    12. Thomas J. Hannigan & Alessandra Perri & Vittoria Giada Scalera, 2016. "The Dispersed Multinational: Does Connectedness Across Spatial Dimensions Lead to Broader Technological Search?," Working Papers 11, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Carlo Salvato, 2009. "Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 384-409, April.
    14. Meier, Matthias & Weller, Ingo, 2010. "Wissensmanagement und unternehmensinterner Wissenstransfer," Discussion Papers 2010/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    15. Haradhan Kumar Mohajan, 2016. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53.
    16. Robertson, Jeandri & Caruana, Albert & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2023. "Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    17. Ghauri, Pervez & Wang, Fatima & Elg, Ulf & Rosendo-Ríos, Veronica, 2016. "Market driving strategies: Beyond localization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5682-5693.
    18. Yu-Hsien Lin & Yu-Shan Chen, 2017. "Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1663-1685, July.
    19. Koen H. Heimeriks & Geert Duysters, 2007. "Alliance Capability as a Mediator Between Experience and Alliance Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the Alliance Capability Development Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 25-49, January.
    20. Talaei-Khoei, Amir & Yang, Alan T. & Masialeti, Masialeti, 2024. "How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:4:y:2024:i:3:p:20-330:d:1448381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.