IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i8p179-d257206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting the Paradigm: An Ecological Systems Approach to Weed Management

Author

Listed:
  • Karla L. Gage

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems and Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA)

  • Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro

    (Assistant Professor, School of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA)

Abstract

Weeds have been historically, and are still today, the primary and most economically important pest in agriculture. Several selection pressures associated with weed management, such as an overreliance on herbicides, have promoted the rapid evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is promoted as an ecological systems approach, through the combination of biological, chemical, cultural, ecological, and mechanical control methods. The concept of a systems approach is defined as managing weeds by combining practice and knowledge with the goals of increasing yield and minimizing economic loss, minimizing risks to human health and the environment, and reducing energy requirements and off-target impacts. The reliance on herbicides in modern cropping systems has shifted the management focus from requiring intimate knowledge of biology, ecology, and ecological systems to herbicide chemistry, mixes, and rotations, application technology, and herbicide-tolerant crop traits. Here, an ecological systems approach is considered, examining new trends and technologies in relation to IWM and weed ecology. Prevention of spread, seedbank management, crop rotations, tillage, cover crops, competitive cultivars, biological weed control, and future solutions in concept-only are presented, and knowledge gaps are identified where research advancements may be possible. An ecological systems approach will provide improved stewardship of new herbicide technologies and reduce herbicide resistance evolution through diversification of selection pressures. Agroecological interactions should be studied in light of new, developing weed control technologies. The science of weed management needs to refocus on the foundations of weed biology and ecology to enable an ecological systems approach and promote agricultural sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Karla L. Gage & Lauren M. Schwartz-Lazaro, 2019. "Shifting the Paradigm: An Ecological Systems Approach to Weed Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:8:p:179-:d:257206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/8/179/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/8/179/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Reiser & El-Sayed Sehsah & Oliver Bumann & Jörg Morhard & Hans W. Griepentrog, 2019. "Development of an Autonomous Electric Robot Implement for Intra-Row Weeding in Vineyards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Frisvold, George B. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Mitchell, Paul D., 2009. "Adoption of Best Management Practices to Control Weed Resistance By Cotton, Corn, and Soybean Growers," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49432, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Livingston, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Unger, Jesse & Osteen, Craig & Schimmelpfennig, David & Park, Tim & Lambert, Dayton, 2015. "The Economics of Glyphosate Resistance Management in Corn and Soybean Production," Economic Research Report 205083, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massfeller, Anna & Storm, Hugo, 2022. "Socio-spatial information sources influencing farmers’ decision to use mechanical weeding in sugar beets," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321154, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    2. Palomo-Campesino, Sara & García-Llorente, Marina & Hevia, Violeta & Boeraeve, Fanny & Dendoncker, Nicolas & González, José A., 2022. "Do agroecological practices enhance the supply of ecosystem services? A comparison between agroecological and conventional horticultural farms," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khanna, Madhu, 2021. "Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Agriculture: Opportunities and Challenges," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315052, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Dong, Fengxia & Mitchell, Paul D. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Frisvold, George B., 2012. "Quantifying Farmer Adoption Intensity for Weed Resistance Management Practices and Its Determinants," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125194, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth J. & Milkove, Daniel, 2016. "The Adoption of Genetically Engineered Alfalfa, Canola and Sugarbeets in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 262136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Katherine Dentzman & Ian Cristofer Burke, 2021. "Herbicide Resistance, Tillage, and Community Management in the Pacific Northwest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Yu, Chengzheng & Khanna, Madhu & Atallah, Shadi S. & Kar, Saurajyoti, 2022. "Economic Incentives for Robotic Weed Control in Row Crop Agriculture," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322149, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Sun, Huichun & Hurley, Terrance M. & Dentzman, Katherine & Ervin, David E. & Everman, Wesley & Frisvold, George B. & Gunsolus, Jeffrey & Norsworthy, Jason & Owen, Micheal, 2017. "Economic and Behavioral Drivers of Herbicide Resistance Management in the U.S," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258417, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Jacobs, A. & Kingwell, R., 2016. "The Harrington Seed Destructor: Its role and value in farming systems facing the challenge of herbicide-resistant weeds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 33-40.
    8. Saavoss, Monica & Capehart, Thomas & McBride, William D & Effland, Anne, 2021. "Trends in Production Practices and Costs of the U.S. Corn Sector," Economic Research Report 327190, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Karla L. Gage & Ronald F. Krausz & S. Alan Walters, 2019. "Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    10. David Weisberger & Melissa Ann Ray & Nicholas T. Basinger & Jennifer Jo Thompson, 2024. "Chemical, ecological, other? Identifying weed management typologies within industrialized cropping systems in Georgia (U.S.)," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 935-953, September.
    11. Chung-Liang Chang & Hung-Wen Chen & Yung-Hsiang Chen & Chang-Chen Yu, 2022. "Drip-Tape-Following Approach Based on Machine Vision for a Two-Wheeled Robot Trailer in Strip Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Scott M. Swinton & Braeden Deynze, 2017. "Hoes to Herbicides: Economics of Evolving Weed Management in the United States," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(3), pages 560-574, July.
    13. Dong, Fengxia & Mitchell, Paul D. & Hurley, Terrance M. & Frisvold, George B., 2016. "Quantifying Adoption Intensity for Weed-Resistance Management Practices and Its Determinants among U.S. Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Farmers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Khanna, Madhu & Atallah, Shadi & Kar, Saurajyoti & Sharma, Bijay & Wu, Linghui & Yu, Chengzheng, 2021. "Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Agriculture in the US: Opportunities and Challenges," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 313799, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Braeden Van Deynze & Scott M. Swinton & David A. Hennessy, 2022. "Are glyphosate‐resistant weeds a threat to conservation agriculture? Evidence from tillage practices in soybeans," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 645-672, March.
    16. G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2020. "Climate Change and Agriculture," Working Papers 2020-01, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    17. Livingston, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Unger, Jesse & Osteen, Craig & Schimmelpfennig, David & Park, Tim & Lambert, Dayton, 2015. "The Economics of Glyphosate Resistance Management in Corn and Soybean Production," Economic Research Report 205083, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Frisvold, George, 2010. "Resistance Management and Sustainable Use of Agricultural Biotechnology," 14th ICABR Conference, June 16-18, 2010, Ravello, Italy 188091, International Consortium on Applied Bioeconomy Research (ICABR).
    19. Ahmed Kayad & Dimitrios S. Paraforos & Francesco Marinello & Spyros Fountas, 2020. "Latest Advances in Sensor Applications in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    20. Ervin, David E. & Breshears, Elise H. & Frisvold, George B. & Hurley, Terrance & Dentzman, Katherine E. & Gunsolus, Jeffrey L. & Jussaume, Raymond A. & Owen, Micheal D.K. & Norsworthy, Jason K. & Al M, 2019. "Farmer Attitudes Toward Cooperative Approaches to Herbicide Resistance Management: A Common Pool Ecosystem Service Challenge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 237-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:8:p:179-:d:257206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.