IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i11p178-d182287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass and Biogas Yield of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Grown under Artificial Shading

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa S. Schulz

    (Institute of Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Sebastian Munz

    (Institute of Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Kerstin Stolzenburg

    (Centre for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg (LTZ), 76287 Rheinstetten-Forchheim, Germany)

  • Jens Hartung

    (Institute of Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Sebastian Weisenburger

    (Centre for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg (LTZ), 76287 Rheinstetten-Forchheim, Germany)

  • Klaus Mastel

    (Regional Council Freiburg, 79083 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany)

  • Kurt Möller

    (Centre for Agricultural Technology Augustenberg (LTZ), 76287 Rheinstetten-Forchheim, Germany)

  • Wilhelm Claupein

    (Institute of Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Simone Graeff-Hönninger

    (Institute of Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Agroforestry, as an improved cropping system, offers some advantages in terms of yield, biodiversity, erosion protection or habitats for beneficial insects. It can fulfill the actual sustainability requirements for bioenergy production like food supply, nature conservation, stop of deforestation. However, competition between intercropped species for water, nutrients and light availability has to be carefully considered. A field trial with shading nets was conducted in Southwest Germany to evaluate the influence of different shading levels (−12, −26, and −50% of full sunlight) on biomass growth, dry matter yield and biogas quality parameters of maize ( Zea mays L., cv. ‘Corioli CS’). Shading the plants causes a delayed development, a reduction in height and leaf area index and a slower senescence. Dry matter yields were reduced about 18%, 19%, and 44% compared to 21.05 Mg ha −1 year −1 at full sunlight. Biogas and methane yields were also significantly reduced, the 50% shading treatment showed a reduction of 45% for both parameters. Further, shading led to higher crude protein and crude ash contents. If silage maize is grown under shade, the yields of dry matter, biogas, and methane are nearly halved under 50% shade. Cultivation up to 26% shading could be possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa S. Schulz & Sebastian Munz & Kerstin Stolzenburg & Jens Hartung & Sebastian Weisenburger & Klaus Mastel & Kurt Möller & Wilhelm Claupein & Simone Graeff-Hönninger, 2018. "Biomass and Biogas Yield of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Grown under Artificial Shading," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:11:p:178-:d:182287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/11/178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/11/178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bożym, Marta & Florczak, Iwona & Zdanowska, Paulina & Wojdalski, Janusz & Klimkiewicz, Marek, 2015. "An analysis of metal concentrations in food wastes for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 467-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efthymios Rodias & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis & Alessandro Sopegno & Patrizia Busato, 2019. "Green, Yellow, and Woody Biomass Supply-Chain Management: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Lucjan Pawłowski & Małgorzata Pawłowska & Cezary A. Kwiatkowski & Elżbieta Harasim, 2021. "The Role of Agriculture in Climate Change Mitigation—A Polish Example," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Grzegorz Zając & Grzegorz Maj & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Tomasz Słowik & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Marcin Dębowski, 2020. "Evaluation of the Properties and Usefulness of Ashes from the Corn Grain Drying Process Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Grzegorz Maj & Paweł Krzaczek & Wojciech Gołębiowski & Tomasz Słowik & Joanna Szyszlak-Bargłowicz & Grzegorz Zając, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Quality of Pellets Made of Waste from Corn Grain Drying Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Li, Jianzheng & Wang, Xin & Fan, Yiyang & Chen, Qiyi & Meng, Jia, 2024. "Biosynthesis of NPs CuS/Cu2S and self-assembly with C. beijerinckii for improving lignocellulosic butanol production in staged butyrate-butanol fermentation process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Rajesh Banu Jeyakumar & Godvin Sharmila Vincent, 2022. "Recent Advances and Perspectives of Nanotechnology in Anaerobic Digestion: A New Paradigm towards Sludge Biodegradability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Yonglan Tian & Shusen Li & Ying Li & Huayong Zhang & Xueyue Mi & Hai Huang, 2019. "Cadmium Addition Effects on Anaerobic Digestion with Elevated Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa & Baniamerian, Hamed & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Kasama, Takeshi & Shahrokhi, Mohammad & Vossoughi, Manouchehr & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Effect of metal oxide based TiO2 nanoparticles on anaerobic digestion process of lignocellulosic substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Kessara Seneesrisakul & Twarath Sutabutr & Sumaeth Chavadej, 2018. "The Effect of Temperature on the Methanogenic Activity in Relation to Micronutrient Availability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Leite, Wanderli Rogério Moreira & Gottardo, Marco & Pavan, Paolo & Belli Filho, Paulo & Bolzonella, David, 2016. "Performance and energy aspects of single and two phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1324-1331.
    8. Giannoukos, Stamatios & Tarik, Mohamed & Ludwig, Christian & Biollaz, Serge & Slowik, Jay & Baltensperger, Urs & Henry Prevot, Andre Stephan, 2021. "Detection of trace metals in biogas using extractive electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 780-787.
    9. Chodkowska-Miszczuk Justyna & Kulla Marián & Novotný Ladislav, 2017. "The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(35), pages 19-34, March.
    10. Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Zhang, Quanguo & Hu, Jianjun & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2016. "Biogas from anaerobic digestion processes: Research updates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 108-119.
    12. Abdelsalam, E. & Samer, M. & Attia, Y.A. & Abdel-Hadi, M.A. & Hassan, H.E. & Badr, Y., 2016. "Comparison of nanoparticles effects on biogas and methane production from anaerobic digestion of cattle dung slurry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 592-598.
    13. Katarzyna Anna Koryś & Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec & Katarzyna Grotkiewicz & Maciej Kuboń, 2019. "The Review of Biomass Potential for Agricultural Biogas Production in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Bedoić, Robert & Špehar, Ana & Puljko, Josip & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Opportunities and challenges: Experimental and kinetic analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rendering industry streams for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. de Castro e Silva, Hellen Luisa & Huamán Córdova, Maxi Estefany & Barros, Regina Mambeli & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lucio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Moreira Santos, Afonso Henriques & dos Santos, Ivan, 2022. "Lab-scale and economic analysis of biogas production from swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 350-365.
    16. Djaafri, Mohammed & Drissi, Aicha & Mehdaoui, Sabrina & Kalloum, Slimane & Atelge, M.R. & Khelafi, Mostefa & Kaidi, Kamel & Salem, Fethya & Tahri, Ahmed & Atabani, A.E. & Štěpanec, Libor, 2023. "Anaerobic digestion of dry palms from five cultivars of Algerian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) namely H'mira, Teggaza, Tinacer, Aghamou and Takarbouchet: A new comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    17. Jerzy Chojnacki & Agnieszka Zdanowicz & Juraj Ondruška & Ľubomír Šooš & Małgorzata Smuga-Kogut, 2021. "The Influence of Apple, Carrot and Red Beet Pomace Content on the Properties of Pellet from Barley Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Bardi, Mohammad Javad & Vinardell, Sergi & Astals, Sergi & Koch, Konrad, 2023. "Opportunities and challenges of micronutrients supplementation and its bioavailability in anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Hegde, Swati & Lodge, Jeffery S. & Trabold, Thomas A., 2018. "Characteristics of food processing wastes and their use in sustainable alcohol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 510-523.
    20. Taghizadeh-Alisaraei, Ahmad & Hosseini, Seyyed Hasan & Ghobadian, Barat & Motevali, Ali, 2017. "Biofuel production from citrus wastes: A feasibility study in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1100-1112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:11:p:178-:d:182287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.