IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i2p192-d1568808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modified SWAT Model for Agricultural Watershed in Karst Area of Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Junfeng Dai

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Linyan Pan

    (College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions, University Engineering Research Center of Green Remediation and Low Carbon Development for Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Yan Deng

    (College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions, University Engineering Research Center of Green Remediation and Low Carbon Development for Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Zupeng Wan

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Rui Xia

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

Abstract

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is extensively used globally for hydrological and water quality assessments but encounters challenges in karst regions due to their complex surface and groundwater hydrological environments. This study aims to refine the delineation of hydrological response units within the SWAT model by combining geomorphological classification and to enhance the model with an epikarst zone hydrological process module, exploring the accuracy improvement of SWAT model simulations in karst regions of Southwest China. Compared with the simulation results of the original SWAT model, we simulated runoff and nutrient concentrations in the Mudong watershed from January 2017 to December 2021 using the improved SWAT model. The simulation results indicated that the modified SWAT model responded more rapidly to precipitation events, particularly in bare karst landform, aligning more closely with the actual hydrological processes in Southwest China’s karst regions. In terms of the predictive accuracy for monthly loads of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) value of the modified model increased by 10.3% and 9.7%, respectively, and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) increased by 11.3% and 9.9%, respectively. The modified SWAT model improves prediction accuracy in karst areas and holds significant practical value for guiding non-point source pollution control in agricultural watersheds.

Suggested Citation

  • Junfeng Dai & Linyan Pan & Yan Deng & Zupeng Wan & Rui Xia, 2025. "Modified SWAT Model for Agricultural Watershed in Karst Area of Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:192-:d:1568808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/2/192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niraula, Rewati & Kalin, Latif & Srivastava, Puneet & Anderson, Christopher J., 2013. "Identifying critical source areas of nonpoint source pollution with SWAT and GWLF," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 123-133.
    2. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Veith, Tamie L. & Collick, Amy S. & Karsten, Heather D. & Buda, Anthony R., 2017. "Simulating hydrological and nonpoint source pollution processes in a karst watershed: A variable source area hydrology model evaluation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PB), pages 212-223.
    3. Sith, Ratino & Watanabe, Atsushi & Nakamura, Takashi & Yamamoto, Takahiro & Nadaoka, Kazuo, 2019. "Assessment of water quality and evaluation of best management practices in a small agricultural watershed adjacent to Coral Reef area in Japan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 659-673.
    4. Xin Zhang & Eric A. Davidson & Denise L. Mauzerall & Timothy D. Searchinger & Patrice Dumas & Ye Shen, 2015. "Managing nitrogen for sustainable development," Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7580), pages 51-59, December.
    5. Strauch, Michael & Volk, Martin, 2013. "SWAT plant growth modification for improved modeling of perennial vegetation in the tropics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 98-112.
    6. Yufeng Wang & Jingli Shao & Chuntian Su & Yali Cui & Qiulan Zhang, 2019. "The Application of Improved SWAT Model to Hydrological Cycle Study in Karst Area of South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianyi Qiu & Yu Shi & Josep Peñuelas & Ji Liu & Qingliang Cui & Jordi Sardans & Feng Zhou & Longlong Xia & Weiming Yan & Shuling Zhao & Shushi Peng & Jinshi Jian & Qinsi He & Wenju Zhang & Min Huang &, 2024. "Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Zeyuan Qiu & Steve W. Lyon & Ellen Creveling, 2020. "Defining a Topographic Index Threshold to Delineate Hydrologically Sensitive Areas for Water Resources Planning and Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(11), pages 3675-3688, September.
    3. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Weijuan Li & Chengdao Huang & Lihua Li, 2022. "Contributing to carbon peak: Estimating the causal impact of eco‐industrial parks on low‐carbon development in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1578-1593, August.
    5. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Miao, Lu, 2023. "The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China's staple crops," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Bin Zhao & Qi Cui & Sisi Zhang & Jiaoning Zhang, 2023. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Labor Demand and Green Innovation Transformation: A Quasi-Experiment from China’s New Environmental Protection Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Otavio Ananias Pereira da Silva & Dayane Bortoloto da Silva & Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira-Filho & Tays Batista Silva & Cid Naudi Silva Campos & Fabio Henrique Rojo Baio & Gileno Brito de Azevedo, 2023. "Macro- and Micronutrient Contents and Their Relationship with Growth in Six Eucalyptus Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    9. David I. Stern, 2017. "The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 7-28, April.
    10. Anna Lungarska & Thierry Brunelle & Raja Chakir & Pierre‐Alain Jayet & Rémi Prudhomme & Stéphane De Cara & Jean‐Christophe Bureau, 2023. "Halving mineral nitrogen use in European agriculture: Insights from multi‐scale land‐use models," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1529-1550, September.
    11. Čerkasova, Natalja & White, Michael & Arnold, Jeffrey & Bieger, Katrin & Allen, Peter & Gao, Jungang & Gambone, Marilyn & Meki, Manyowa & Kiniry, James & Gassman, Philip W., 2023. "Field scale SWAT+ modeling of corn and soybean yields for the contiguous United States: National Agroecosystem Model Development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Jiuliang Xu & Liangquan Wu & Bingxin Tong & Jiaxu Yin & Zican Huang & Wei Li & Xuexian Li, 2021. "Magnesium Supplementation Alters Leaf Metabolic Pathways for Higher Flavor Quality of Oolong Tea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Agnieszka Sobolewska & Marcin Bukowski, 2025. "Consumption of Nitrogen Fertilizers in the EU—External Costs of Their Production by Country of Application," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Rath, S. & Zamora-Re, M. & Graham, W. & Dukes, M. & Kaplan, D., 2021. "Quantifying nitrate leaching to groundwater from a corn-peanut rotation under a variety of irrigation and nutrient management practices in the Suwannee River Basin, Florida," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Jingchao Liu & Jin Wu & Shaowei Rong & Yanna Xiong & Yanguo Teng, 2022. "Groundwater Vulnerability and Groundwater Contamination Risk in Karst Area of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Ramesh P. Rudra & Balew A. Mekonnen & Rituraj Shukla & Narayan Kumar Shrestha & Pradeep K. Goel & Prasad Daggupati & Asim Biswas, 2020. "Currents Status, Challenges, and Future Directions in Identifying Critical Source Areas for Non-Point Source Pollution in Canadian Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Wen, Shenglin & Cui, Ningbo & Wang, Yaosheng & Gong, Daozhi & Xing, Liwen & Wu, Zongjun & Zhang, Yixuan & Wang, Zhihui, 2024. "Determining effect of fertilization on reactive nitrogen losses through nitrate leaching and key influencing factors in Chinese agricultural systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    18. Jun Li & Jiali Xing & Rui Ding & Wenjiao Shi & Xiaoli Shi & Xiaoqing Wang, 2023. "Systematic Evaluation of Nitrogen Application in the Production of Multiple Crops and Its Environmental Impacts in Fujian Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Qian Wu & Chencheng Dai & Fanxu Meng & Yan Jiao & Zhichuan J. Xu, 2024. "Potential and electric double-layer effect in electrocatalytic urea synthesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil Abhilash, 2021. "Restoring the Unrestored: Strategies for Restoring Global Land during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UN-DER)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:192-:d:1568808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.