IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i9p1554-d1473817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A SWOT Analysis of Organizations in the Agri-Food Chain Sector from the Northern Region of Portugal Using the PESTEL and MEETHS Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Madureira

    (Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability (CISAS), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    Escola Superior Agrária (ESA), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

  • Fernando Nunes

    (Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability (CISAS), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    Escola Superior Agrária (ESA), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

  • Fernando Mata

    (Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability (CISAS), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

  • Manuela Vaz-Velho

    (Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability (CISAS), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
    Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão (ESTG), Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo (IPVC), 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal)

Abstract

Research on modern agri-food chains aims to enhance flexibility by analyzing supply chain aspects to identify improvement opportunities. A SWOT analysis of 39 agri-food sector organizations using a SWOT analysis organized using the PESTEL and MEETHS categories was conducted to evaluate the stakeholders’ needs in this sector of activity in Northern Portugal. Logistic regressions were used to compute inferential statistics, which were complemented with a qualitative analysis. Cooperatives and primary sector companies often claim superior product quality without clear evidence, while corporations integrated into competitive national markets, like those with smoked products, adapt better to dietary trends. Small- and medium-sized enterprises struggle with competitive wages, leading to high turnover and difficulty retaining skilled workers. High costs hinder many organizations, particularly cooperatives, from adopting modern communication technologies affecting competitiveness. Challenges include identifying market opportunities and managing global competition for raw materials, like wild fish. Fishing and meat sectors depend heavily on modern distribution and are dominated by large retailers. Low labor costs boost competitiveness but reflect the struggle to add value. Larger organizations are more optimistic though many face challenges with the cost and volatility of key products, like pork and milk. This study offers the following key recommendations: invest in technology and innovation while balancing short-term gains with long-term sustainability; strengthen strategic planning and collaboration among corporations, cooperatives, associations, and academic institutions; and adapt to regulatory changes, invest in market and technological capabilities, and address resource limitations. Research and collaboration with policymakers and academic institutions will support tailored solutions, enabling the sector to anticipate challenges and capitalize on opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Madureira & Fernando Nunes & Fernando Mata & Manuela Vaz-Velho, 2024. "A SWOT Analysis of Organizations in the Agri-Food Chain Sector from the Northern Region of Portugal Using the PESTEL and MEETHS Frameworks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1554-:d:1473817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1554/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/9/1554/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Spear & Chris Cornforth & Mike Aiken, 2009. "The Governance Challenges Of Social Enterprises: Evidence From A Uk Empirical Study," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 247-273, June.
    2. Mariacristina Piva & Marco Vivarelli, 2018. "Technological change and employment: is Europe ready for the challenge?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(1), pages 13-32, March.
    3. Cucagna, Maria Emilia & Goldsmith, Peter D., 2018. "Value Adding in the Agri-Food Value Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), February.
    4. Carraresi, Laura & Banterle, Alessandro, 2015. "Agri-food Competitive Performance in EU Countries: A Fifteen-Year Retrospective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma, 2017. "The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 111-131, June.
    6. Rachel Bocquet & Christian Le Bas & Caroline Mothe & Nicolas Poussing, 2017. "CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 241-254, November.
    7. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2020. "Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Klein Jr., Vitor Hugo & Reilley, Jacob T., 2024. "The temporal dynamics of enterprise risk management," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1141-1173, November.
    10. Sylvia Grewatsch & Ingo Kleindienst, 2017. "When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 383-416, October.
    11. Magali A. Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1055, October.
    12. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    13. Richard J. Sexton & Tian Xia, 2018. "Increasing Concentration in the Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Market Power and Sector Performance," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 229-251, October.
    14. Alessandro Banterle & Alessia Cavaliere & Laura Carraresi & Stefanella Stranieri, 2014. "Food SMEs Face Increasing Competition in the EU Market: Marketing Management Capability Is a Tool for Becoming a Price Maker," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 113-131, March.
    15. Liu, Yongmei & Combs, James G. & Ketchen Jr., David J. & Ireland, R. Duane, 2007. "The value of human resource management for organizational performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 503-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongan Zhang & Umair Khan & Seoyeon Lee & Madiha Salik, 2019. "The Influence of Management Innovation and Technological Innovation on Organization Performance. A Mediating Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Hongze Lu, 2023. "Managerial Short-Termism and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Role of External Monitoring," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 759-778, December.
    3. Percy Marquina & Vincent Charles, 2021. "A Bayesian resampling approach to estimate the difference in effect sizes in consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1680-1699, November.
    4. Sajid Ullah & Farman Ullah Khan & Laura-Mariana Cismaș & Muhammad Usman & Andra Miculescu, 2022. "Do Tournament Incentives Matter for CEOs to Be Environmentally Responsible? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Soytas, Mehmet Ali & Denizel, Meltem & Durak Usar, Damla, 2019. "Addressing endogeneity in the causal relationship between sustainability and financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 56-71.
    6. Uşar, Damla Durak & Denizel, Meltem & Soytaş, Mehmet Ali, 2019. "Corporate sustainability interactions: A game theoretical approach to sustainability actions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 196-211.
    7. Zhou Liang & Qi Zhang & Weiwei Wu & Xi Liu, 2024. "The synergistic effect of corporate environmental responsibility and technological base on firm performance: From the perspective of knowledge recombination," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4384-4397, September.
    8. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Hazen, Benjamin & Giannakis, Mihalis & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 63-76.
    9. Rick Hardcopf & Rachna Shah & Suvrat Dhanorkar, 2021. "The Impact of a Spill or Pollution Accident on Firm Environmental Activity: An Empirical Investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2467-2491, August.
    10. Francesca Collevecchio & Gianluca Gionfriddo, 2023. "Adopting a social purpose in for-profit firms: the role of the board of directors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1467-1499, September.
    11. Ginesti, Gianluca & Campa, Domenico & Spano’, Rosanna & Allini, Alessandra & Maffei, Marco, 2023. "The role of CSR committee characteristics on R&D investments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    12. Maury, Benjamin, 2022. "Strategic CSR and firm performance: The role of prospector and growth strategies," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    14. Hartmann, Julia & Inkpen, Andrew & Ramaswamy, Kannan, 2022. "An FsQCA exploration of multiple paths to ecological innovation adoption in European transportation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    15. Børge Obel & Pernille Kallehave, 2022. "Designing a sustainable organization: the four I’s framework," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(2), pages 65-76, June.
    16. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2024. "Energy transition and non-energy firms’ financial performance: Do markets value capability-based energy transition strategies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Merce Bernardo & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2020. "Rethinking the Way of Doing Business: A Reframe of Management Structures for Developing Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, February.
    18. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Sinziana Dorobantu & Aseem Kaul & Bennet Zelner, 2017. "Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 114-140, January.
    19. Ayşe İrem Keskin & Banu Dincer & Caner Dincer, 2020. "Exploring the Impact of Sustainability on Corporate Financial Performance Using Discriminant Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Hsu, Bo-Xiang & Chen, Yi-Min & Chen, Li-An (Leann), 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and value added in the supply chain: Model and mechanism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:1554-:d:1473817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.