IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i6p897-d1409871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ground Management Through Grazing in Rainfed Olive Orchards Provides High Olive Yields and Has Other Potential Benefits for Both the Soil and the Farmer

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Dimande

    (Escola Superior de Desenvolvimento Rural, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Bairro 5º Congresso, VilanKulos 1304, Mozambique
    Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)

  • Margarida Arrobas

    (Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
    Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)

  • Carlos M. Correia

    (Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Manuel Ângelo Rodrigues

    (Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
    Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)

Abstract

Soil management in orchards can have several economic and environmental implications. In this study, three different soil management systems were compared in a dry-farmed olive grove: conventional tillage (tillage), glyphosate-based herbicide (herbicide) and sheep grazing. The experiment lasted eleven years (2011–2022) and was carried out after a previous trial conducted on the same plot with the same treatments and duration (2001–2011). However, in the earlier trial, the herbicide and sheep grazing treatments switched positions in the plot, while the tillage treatment remained in its original place. The average total accumulated olive yields between 2011 and 2022 were 225.1, 230.9, and 245.0 kg tree −1 for the sheep grazing, tillage, and herbicide treatments, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed between the treatments. The levels of total organic carbon in the soil, measured in samples collected in the last year of the study, were 41.3, 33.7, and 37.3 g kg −1 , respectively, for the same treatments. These findings indicated that the tillage treatment exhibited lower soil organic matter content and reduced bioavailability of some nutrients, which raises concerns about its sustainability. On the contrary, employing sheep grazing with an appropriate stocking rate, effectively controlling vegetation in the spring, ensured favourable soil properties and olive yields comparable to the other treatments. Moreover, the sheep grazing approach provides supplementary advantages to the farmer, including revenue from the sale of animal products and the opportunity to transition to organic farming systems, which better align with the preferences of contemporary societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Dimande & Margarida Arrobas & Carlos M. Correia & Manuel Ângelo Rodrigues, 2024. "Ground Management Through Grazing in Rainfed Olive Orchards Provides High Olive Yields and Has Other Potential Benefits for Both the Soil and the Farmer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:897-:d:1409871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ravjit Khangura & David Ferris & Cameron Wagg & Jamie Bowyer, 2023. "Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, January.
    2. Pôças, I. & Calera, A. & Campos, I. & Cunha, M., 2020. "Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    4. Morugán-Coronado, Alicia & Linares, Carlos & Gómez-López, María Dolores & Faz, Ángel & Zornoza, Raúl, 2020. "The impact of intercropping, tillage and fertilizer type on soil and crop yield in fruit orchards under Mediterranean conditions: A meta-analysis of field studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Md Jebu Mia & Francesca Massetani & Giorgio Murri & Davide Neri, 2020. "Sustainable alternatives to chemicals for weed control in the orchard - a Review," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 47(1), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pradeep Rai & Sosheel S. Godfrey & Christine E. Storer & Karl Behrendt & Ryan H. L. Ip & Thomas L. Nordblom, 2025. "Unravelling Regenerative Agriculture’s Sustainability Benefits and Outcomes: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Pei Wang & Jingjing Ma & Juanjuan Ma & Haitao Sun & Qi Chen, 2021. "A Novel Approach for the Simulation of Reference Evapotranspiration and Its Partitioning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Albert Amoakwah & Dr. Isaac Atta Kwenin & Asante George & Kingsford Ebenezer Appiah & Amoah Emmanuel, 2025. "Social Studies Teachers’ Knowledge of Climate Change: The Role of Social Studies Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2863-2873, January.
    4. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Liu, Shouyang & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Liyuan & Cui, Xin, 2021. "Mapping maize crop coefficient Kc using random forest algorithm based on leaf area index and UAV-based multispectral vegetation indices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Christian Mera-Parra & Fernando Oñate-Valdivieso & Priscilla Massa-Sánchez & Pablo Ochoa-Cueva, 2021. "Establishment of the Baseline for the IWRM in the Ecuadorian Andean Basins: Land Use Change, Water Recharge, Meteorological Forecast and Hydrological Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Giulio Flavio Rizzo & Nicolas Al Achkar & Simone Treccarichi & Giuseppe Malgioglio & Matteo Giuseppe Infurna & Sebastian Nigro & Alessandro Tribulato & Ferdinando Branca, 2023. "Use of Bioinoculants Affects Variation in Snap Bean Yield Grown under Deficit Irrigation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Elsadig Omer & Dora Szlatenyi & Sándor Csenki & Jomana Alrwashdeh & Ivan Czako & Vince Láng, 2024. "Farming Practice Variability and Its Implications for Soil Health in Agriculture: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Ramírez-Cuesta, J.M. & Intrigliolo, D.S. & Lorite, I.J. & Moreno, M.A. & Vanella, D. & Ballesteros, R. & Hernández-López, D. & Buesa, I., 2023. "Determining grapevine water use under different sustainable agronomic practices using METRIC-UAV surface energy balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Technological Innovations for Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries: Enhancing Resource Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," MPRA Paper 118215, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Jul 2023.
    10. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Fernandez-Bou, Angel Santiago & Rodriguez-Flores, Jose M. & Ortiz-Partida, J. Pablo & Fencl, Amanda & Classen-Rodriguez, Leticia & Yang, Vivian & Williams, Emily & Schull, Val Zayden & Dobbin, Kristin, 2024. "Cropland repurposing as a tool for water sustainability and a just socioenvironmental transition in California: Review and Best Practices," OSF Preprints bvfsm, Center for Open Science.
    12. Mohsin Mahmood & Sajid Mehmood & Waqas Ahmed & Ahmed Salah Elrys & Yi Tian & Xiaoli Hui & Anam Ayyoub & Ahmed S. M. Elnahal & Weidong Li & Zhaohui Wang & Jinshan Liu, 2023. "Exploring Phosphorus Fraction Dynamics in Loess Soils: Impact of Long-Term Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization on Cropland and Fallow Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Zhang, Yu & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Niu, Xiaotao & Shao, Guomin, 2023. "Evaluating maize evapotranspiration using high-resolution UAV-based imagery and FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Bernardo Martin-Gorriz & José A. Zabala & Virginia Sánchez-Navarro & Belén Gallego-Elvira & Víctor Martínez-García & Francisco Alcon & José Francisco Maestre-Valero, 2022. "Intercropping Practices in Mediterranean Mandarin Orchards from an Environmental and Economic Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Nicola Favretto & Lindsay C. Stringer, 2024. "Climate resilient development in vulnerable geographies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 1-32, December.
    16. Wen, Shenglin & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Xing, Liwen & Wu, Zongjun & Zhang, Yixuan & Wang, Zhihui & Wang, Jiaxin, 2023. "Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application for achieving high yield with low environmental risks in apple orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    17. De Caro, Dario & Ippolito, Matteo & Cannarozzo, Marcella & Provenzano, Giuseppe & Ciraolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Assessing the performance of the Gaussian Process Regression algorithm to fill gaps in the time-series of daily actual evapotranspiration of different crops in temperate and continental zones using gr," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    18. Theocharis Chatzistathis & Victor Kavvadias & Thomas Sotiropoulos & Ioannis E. Papadakis, 2021. "Organic Fertilization and Tree Orchards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Manuel Barneo-Alcántara & Manuel Díaz-Pérez & Marta Gómez-Galán & José Pérez-Alonso & Ángel-Jesús Callejón-Ferre, 2020. "Musculoskeletal Risks of Farmers in the Olive Grove (Jaén-Spain)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-38, October.
    20. Clara Gabaldón-Leal & Álvaro Sánchez-Virosta & Carolina Doña & José González-Piqueras & Juan Manuel Sánchez & Ramón López-Urrea, 2024. "Ground Measurements and Remote Sensing Modeling of Gross Primary Productivity and Water Use Efficiency in Almond Agroecosystems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:897-:d:1409871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.