IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p981-d1576814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling Regenerative Agriculture’s Sustainability Benefits and Outcomes: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Pradeep Rai

    (School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2658, Australia
    Gulbali Institute, Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

  • Sosheel S. Godfrey

    (School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2658, Australia
    Gulbali Institute, Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

  • Christine E. Storer

    (School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2658, Australia
    Gulbali Institute, Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

  • Karl Behrendt

    (Gulbali Institute, Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
    Harper Adams Business School, Harper Adams University, Newport TF10 8NB, UK)

  • Ryan H. L. Ip

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Thomas L. Nordblom

    (School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2658, Australia
    Gulbali Institute, Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia)

Abstract

Regenerative Agriculture (RA) has emerged as an environment-centric agriculture that prioritises reducing synthetic inputs, emphasising holistic management focussed on sustainability. However, evidence linking RA practices to desired sustainable outcomes remains inconclusive, and today’s modern conventional agriculture (MCA) prioritises similar aspects. This scoping review explores RA’s origins and how its proponents perceive sustainable outcomes. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses—extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, our review searched peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Web of Science, along with a Google Scholar snowball search, up to July 2024. Of the 71 articles reviewed in detail, 46 explicitly discussed RA, and 25 addressed sustainability or holistic management relevant to RA. Key research gaps identified include: (1) Despite varying definitions and uncertain outcomes, growing interest in RA warrants further research into farmers’ preferences for RA over MCA. (2) There is insufficient evidence on how farmers balance the interconnected elements in the economic, social, and environmental domains for sustainable outcomes. (3) RA practices are often unclear and overlap with other production methods, necessitating clearer definitions of input systems and strategies used to comprehend RA’s biophysical and economic outcomes. A conceptual framework is proposed to guide future research and inform agricultural sustainability programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradeep Rai & Sosheel S. Godfrey & Christine E. Storer & Karl Behrendt & Ryan H. L. Ip & Thomas L. Nordblom, 2025. "Unravelling Regenerative Agriculture’s Sustainability Benefits and Outcomes: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:981-:d:1576814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:981-:d:1576814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.