IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1590-d1214588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Use of Chemical Pesticides and Biopesticides among Rice–Crayfish Integrated System Farmers in China: A Multivariate Probit Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Liu

    (Food Safety Research Center, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430048, China
    School of Management, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430048, China)

  • Zhenhong Qi

    (College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Li Tan

    (Food Safety Research Center, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430048, China)

  • Caiyan Yang

    (School of Business, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Canwei Hu

    (Food Safety Research Center, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430048, China)

Abstract

Biopesticides are perceived as a feasible alternative to chemical pesticides, providing an effective approach to pest management while mitigating the undesirable effects of chemical pesticide overuse. Yet, due to the distinctive attributes of the two types of pesticides, farmers often adopt a combination of both. This study aimed to probe the interdependent relationship underlying the mixed use of chemical pesticides and biopesticides by farmers in the rice–crayfish integrated system (RCIS) in Hubei province, China. We also sought to identify influencing factors and associated consequences of this practice. Given that the adoption of chemical pesticides and biopesticides by farmers is not mutually exclusive, a multivariable probit model was utilized to estimate simultaneous pesticide applications. Survey data from 736 RCIS farmers revealed that 10.50% of the sample farmers employ a combination of chemical pesticides and biopesticides. A substitution relationship was observed between the adoption of chemical pesticides and biopesticides by farmers, whereas no significant complementary relationship was found in the application of the two types of pesticides. The primary motivation for the mixed use of pesticides by farmers is to achieve superior pest control efficacy. Notably, when integrating the use of pesticides, farmers pay less attention to factors such as resource endowments and multiple production objectives. Further analysis indicated that farmers display significant concern for pesticide attributes including insecticidal efficacy, toxicity, insecticidal spectrum, and validity period. The mixed use of pesticides has resulted in a decreased frequency of pesticide application but has escalated the cost. While the mixed use of pesticides elevated the selling price of rice, no significant improvement was observed in yield and output value. The insights garnered from this study offer strategic implications for policymakers on how to enhance the judicious adoption of pesticides by farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Liu & Zhenhong Qi & Li Tan & Caiyan Yang & Canwei Hu, 2023. "Mixed Use of Chemical Pesticides and Biopesticides among Rice–Crayfish Integrated System Farmers in China: A Multivariate Probit Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1590-:d:1214588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongmei Li & Mariam A. T. J. Kadzamira & Adewale Ogunmodede & Elizabeth Finch & Jingquan Zhu & Dannie Romney & Belinda Luke, 2023. "Lessons Learned and Challenges of Biopesticide Usage for Locust Management—The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Victor Owusu & Awudu Abdulai, 2019. "Examining the economic impacts of integrated pest management among vegetable farmers in Southern Ghana," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(11), pages 1886-1907, September.
    3. Wuepper, David & Roleff, Nikolaus & Finger, Robert, 2021. "Does it matter who advises farmers? Pest management choices with public and private extension," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Xiaoheng Zhang & Xiaohua Yu & Xu Tian & Xianhui Geng & Yingheng Zhou, 2019. "Farm size, inefficiency, and rice production cost in China," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 57-68, December.
    5. Xiaoheng Zhang & Xiaohua Yu, 2021. "Short supply chain participation, and agrochemicals' use intensity and efficiency: evidence from vegetable farms in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 721-735, June.
    6. Jingjing Gao & Qingen Gai & Binbin Liu & Qinghua Shi, 2021. "Farm size and pesticide use: evidence from agricultural production in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 912-929, August.
    7. Ehiakpor, Dennis Sedem & Danso-Abbeam, Gideon & Mubashiru, Yussif, 2021. "Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Belderbos, Rene & Carree, Martin & Diederen, Bert & Lokshin, Boris & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2004. "Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1237-1263, November.
    9. Lai, Wangyang, 2017. "Pesticide use and health outcomes: Evidence from agricultural water pollution in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 93-120.
    10. Chèze, Benoît & David, Maia & Martinet, Vincent, 2020. "Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Nilanjan Chakraborty & Rusha Mitra & Somrhita Pal & Retwika Ganguly & Krishnendu Acharya & Tatiana Minkina & Anik Sarkar & Chetan Keswani, 2023. "Biopesticide Consumption in India: Insights into the Current Trends," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Xiaoheng Zhang & Xiaohua Yu, 2021. "Short supply chain participation, and agrochemicals' use intensity and efficiency: evidence from vegetable farms in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 721-735, June.
    13. Lorenzo Cappellari & Stephen P. Jenkins, 2003. "Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(3), pages 278-294, September.
    14. Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Ioan Banatean-Dunea & Stefan Cristian Vesa & Sofia Copacinschi & Dacinia Crina Petrescu, 2019. "What Do Romanian Farmers Think about the Effects of Pesticides? Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Pesticides," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Jingjing Gao & Qingen Gai & Binbin Liu & Qinghua Shi, 2021. "Farm size and pesticide use: evidence from agricultural production in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 912-929, August.
    16. Yuying Liu & Ruiling Shi & Yiting Peng & Wei Wang & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Impacts of Technology Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Adoption of Biopesticides in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuying Liu & Rubin Chen & Yufan Chen & Tinglei Yu & Xinhong Fu, 2024. "Impact of the degree of agricultural green production technology adoption on income: evidence from Sichuan citrus growers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng & Amaka Nnaji, 2023. "Cooperative membership and adoption of green pest control practices: Insights from rice farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(3), pages 459-479, July.
    2. Isabel Freitas & Tommy Clausen & Roberto Fontana & Bart Verspagen, 2011. "Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-119, February.
    3. Menale Kassie & Precious Zikhali & Kebede Manjur & Sue Edwards, 2009. "Adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Evidence from a semi‐arid region of Ethiopia," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(3), pages 189-198, August.
    4. Trinh, Thoai Quang & Rañola, Roberto F. & Camacho, Leni D. & Simelton, Elisabeth, 2018. "Determinants of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in agricultural production in the central region of Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 224-231.
    5. David Aristei & Michela Vecchi & Francesco Venturini, 2016. "University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 841-871, August.
    6. Barros, Henrique M., 2021. "Neither at the cutting edge nor in a patent-friendly environment: Appropriating the returns from innovation in a less developed economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    7. Muhammad Ashraf & Jayant Routray & Muhammad Saeed, 2014. "Determinants of farmers’ choice of coping and adaptation measures to the drought hazard in northwest Balochistan, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1451-1473, September.
    8. Xiaoheng Zhang & Wanglin Ma & Puneet Vatsa & Shijie Jiang, 2023. "Short supply chain, technical efficiency, and technological change: Insights from cucumber production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 371-386, March.
    9. Vitaliy Roud & Valeriya Vlasova, 2016. "Firm-Level Evidence on the Cooperative Innovation Strategies in Russian Manufacturing," HSE Working papers WP BRP 63/STI/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    10. Martin Srholec, 2011. "Understanding the heterogeneity of cooperation on innovation: Firm-level evidence from Europe," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20111201, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    11. Ipsita Roy, 2018. "Role of human resource practices in absorptive capacity and R&D cooperation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 885-913, September.
    12. Beatrice W. Muriithi & Kassie Menale & Gracious Diiro & Geoffrey Muricho, 2018. "Does gender matter in the adoption of push-pull pest management and other sustainable agricultural practices? Evidence from Western Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 253-272, April.
    13. Weltin, M. & Zasada, I., 2018. "Adopting and Combining Strategies of Sustainable Intensification An Analysis of Interdependencies in Farmers Decision Making," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276982, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Erika Badillo & Rosina Moreno, 2012. "“What Drives the Choice of Partners in R&D Cooperation? Heterogeneity across Sectors”," IREA Working Papers 201213, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jul 2012.
    15. Carboni, Oliviero A., 2013. "Heterogeneity in R&D collaboration: An empirical investigation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 48-59.
    16. Pan, Dan & Zhang, Ning & Kong, Fanbin, 2021. "Does it matter who gives information? The impact of information sources on farmers’ pesticide use in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Chiaverina, Pierre & Drogué, Sophie & Jacquet, Florence, 2024. "Do Farmers Participating in Short Food Supply Chains Use Less Pesticides? Evidence from France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Musungu, Arnold Lumumbah & Otieno, David Jakinda & Muriithi, Beatrice Wambui & Nyikal, Rose & Masiga, Daniel & Okal, Michael Nyanganga, 2021. "Are the current animal trypanosomiasis management methods in Kenya complementary or substitutes? Evidence from Kwale County," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(01), March.
    19. Martin Srholec, 2016. "Persistence of Cooperation on Innovation: Econometric Evidence from Panel Micro Data," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(1), pages 53-70.
    20. Nguyen Hung Anh & Wolfgang Bokelmann, 2019. "Determinants of Smallholders’ Market Preferences: The Case of Sustainable Certified Coffee Farmers in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1590-:d:1214588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.