IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p568-d1081289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Acaricide Application Methods against Heartwater Disease in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mario J. J. van den Heever

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Willem A. Lombard

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Yonas T. Bahta

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

  • Frikkie A. Maré

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)

Abstract

In an economic sense, heartwater disease is the most important tick-borne disease faced by South African livestock farmers. Methods to control the disease vary among farmers, and the preferred method depends on the prevalence of the disease in a specific area. The cost-effectiveness of different acaricide prevention methods against heartwater disease has not yet been determined amongst South African livestock producers. The study’s objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of acaricide prevention methods used against heartwater disease in South Africa. Data used for this study were collected through a survey and structured questionnaires from 272 commercial livestock farmers in South Africa. Cost-effectiveness analyses were done on the spray, plunge, and pour-on acaricide application methods. For sheep and cattle, the plunge method proved to be the most cost-effective in all provinces of South Africa. In goats, pour-on acaricide application was the most cost-effective. The study recommends that extension activities provide farmers with information with which to choose the most appropriate acaricide application for the effective and sustainable control of heartwater disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario J. J. van den Heever & Willem A. Lombard & Yonas T. Bahta & Frikkie A. Maré, 2023. "Cost-Effectiveness of Acaricide Application Methods against Heartwater Disease in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:568-:d:1081289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Espinosa & Damian Tago & Nicolas Treich, 2020. "Infectious Diseases and Meat Production," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1019-1044, August.
    2. Richard Bennett, 2003. "The ‘Direct Costs’of Livestock Disease: The Development of a System of Models for the Analysis of 30 Endemic Livestock Diseases in Great Britain," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 55-71, March.
    3. Rendani Randela, 2005. "Cost-benefit analysis of a disease control programme with special reference to ticks and tick-borne diseases in the former Venda region," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 515-528.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David A. Hennessy, 2007. "Behavioral Incentives, Equilibrium Endemic Disease, and Health Management Policy for Farmed Animals," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(3), pages 698-711.
    2. Alejandro Acosta & Carlos Barrantes & Rico Ihle, 2020. "Animal disease outbreaks and food market price dynamics: Evidence from regime‐dependent modelling and connected scatterplots," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 960-976, July.
    3. Stott, Alistair W. & Milne, Catherine E. & Gunn, George J., 2009. "Evaluation of approaches to control of Maedi-Visna disease of sheep using a Markov chain simulation model for a range of typical British Flocks," Working Papers 61102, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    4. Romain Espinosa & Nicolas Treich, 2023. "Eliciting Non-hypothetical Willingness-to-pay for Novel Products: An Application to Cultured Meat," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(3), pages 673-706, August.
    5. Gramig, Benjamin M. & Horan, Richard D., 2011. "Jointly determined livestock disease dynamics and decentralised economic behavior," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(3), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2022. "How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Stéphanie Truchet & Nicolas Mauhe & Marie Herve, 2017. "Veterinarian shortage areas: what determines the location of new graduates?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 255-282, December.
    8. Belaya, Vera & Hansen, Heiko & Pinior, Beate, 2012. "Measuring The Costs Of Foodborne Diseases: A Review And Classification Of The Literature," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 138195, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    9. Bry-Chevalier, Tom, 2024. "Comparing the potential of meat alternatives for a more sustainable food system," OSF Preprints ze5yt, Center for Open Science.
    10. Stott, Alistair W., 2006. "Optimisation methods for assisting policy decisions on endemic diseases," Working Papers 46000, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    11. Helen H. Jensen, 2005. "Infectious Disease, Productivity, and Scale in Open and Closed Animal Production Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 900-917.
    12. Richard J. Volpe & Timothy A. Park & Fengxia Dong & Helen H. Jensen, 2016. "Somatic cell counts in dairy marketing: quantile regression for count data," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(2), pages 331-358.
    13. Weldegebriel, Habtu T. & Gunn, George J. & Stott, Alistair W., 2008. "Winners and losers from Johne’s disease eradication from the Scottish dairy herd: a Markov-Chain simulation," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 36872, Agricultural Economics Society.
    14. Marielle Stel & Nicole Banach, 2023. "Preventing Zoonoses: Testing an Intervention to Change Attitudes and Behaviors toward More Protective Actions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Bonnet, Céline & Coinon, Marine, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Claire Heffernan & Lena Azbel-Jackson & Joe Brownlie & George Gunn, 2016. "Farmer Attitudes and Livestock Disease: Exploring Citizenship Behaviour and Peer Monitoring across Two BVD Control Schemes in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Mbabazi, Esther Gloria, 2016. "Cost Effectiveness Of And Willingness To Pay For Vaccination Of Village Free-Range Poultry Against Newcastle Disease In Iganga District," Research Theses 265577, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    18. Nicolas Treich, 2021. "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(1), pages 33-61, May.
    19. Funke, Franziska & Mattauch, Linus & van den Bijgaart, Inge & Godfray, Charles & Hepburn, Cameron & Klenert, David & Springmann, Marco & Treich, Nicholas, 2021. "Is Meat Too Cheap? Towards Optimal Meat Taxation," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-08, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    20. Ore Koren & Jessica Steinberg & Amit Hagar, 2024. "Meat production and zoonotic disease outbreaks in Asia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 68(3), pages 567-586, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:568-:d:1081289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.