IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p276-d1044914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Transgenic ( Bt ) Cotton on the Productivity of Various Cotton-Based Cropping Systems in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Waseem Riaz Marral

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Fiaz Ahmad

    (Physiology/Chemistry Section, Central Cotton Research Institute, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Sami Ul-Allah

    (College of Agriculture, BZU Bahadur Sub-Campus, Layyah 31200, Pakistan
    College of Agriculture, University of Layyah, Layyah 31200, Pakistan)

  • Atique-ur-Rehman

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Shahid Farooq

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Sanlıurfa 63050, Turkey)

  • Mubshar Hussain

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia)

Abstract

Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) is an important fiber crop in Pakistan with significant economic importance. Transgenic, insect-resistant cotton (carrying a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt )) was inducted in the cotton-based cropping systems of Pakistan during 2002, and is now sown in >90% of cotton fields in the country. However, concerns are rising that Bt cotton would decrease the productivity of winter crops (sown after cotton), leading to decreased system productivity. This two-year field study determined the impacts of transgenic ( Bt ) and non-transgenic (non- Bt ) cotton genotypes on the productivities of winter crops (i.e., wheat, Egyptian clover, and canola), and the overall productivities of the cropping systems including these crops. Four cotton genotypes (two Bt and two non- Bt ) and three winter crops (i.e., wheat, Egyptian clover, and canola) were included in the study. Nutrient availability was assessed after the harvest of cotton and winter crops. Similarly, the yield-related traits of cotton and winter crops were recorded at their harvest. The productivities of the winter crops were converted to net economic returns, and the overall economic returns of the cropping systems with winter crops were computed. The results revealed that Bt and non- Bt cotton genotypes significantly ( p < 0.05) altered nutrient availability (N, P, K, B, Zn, and Fe). However, the yield-related attributes of winter crops were not affected by cotton genotypes, whereas the overall profitability of the cropping systems varied among the cotton genotypes. Economic analyses indicated that the Bt cotton–wheat cropping system was the most profitable, with a benefit–cost ratio of 1.55 in the semi-arid region of Pakistan. It is concluded that Bt cotton could be successfully inducted into the existing cropping systems of Pakistan without any decrease to the overall productivity of the cropping system.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Waseem Riaz Marral & Fiaz Ahmad & Sami Ul-Allah & Atique-ur-Rehman & Shahid Farooq & Mubshar Hussain, 2023. "Influence of Transgenic ( Bt ) Cotton on the Productivity of Various Cotton-Based Cropping Systems in Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:276-:d:1044914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahzad Kouser & Matin Qaim, 2013. "Valuing financial, health, and environmental benefits of Bt cotton in Pakistan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(3), pages 323-335, May.
    2. Wilhelm Klümper & Matin Qaim, 2014. "A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mubshar Hussain & Sami Ul-Allah & Shahid Farooq, 2023. "Integrated Crop Management in Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-3, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahzad Kouser & David J Spielman & Matin Qaim, 2019. "Transgenic cotton and farmers’ health in Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Vincent Smith & Justus H. H. Wesseler & David Zilberman, 2021. "New Plant Breeding Technologies: An Assessment of the Political Economy of the Regulatory Environment and Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Phélinas, Pascale & Choumert, Johanna, 2017. "Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 452-462.
    4. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Lusk, Jayson & Magnier, Alexandre, 2018. "The price of non-genetically modified (non-GM) food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-50.
    5. Paul Vincelli, 2016. "Genetic Engineering and Sustainable Crop Disease Management: Opportunities for Case-by-Case Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Tylecote, Andrew, 2019. "Biotechnology as a new techno-economic paradigm that will help drive the world economy and mitigate climate change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 858-868.
    7. Neubauer, Florian & Wall, Alan & Njuki, Eric & Bravo-Ureta, Boris, 2023. "Climatic Effects and Farming Performance: An Overview of Selected Studies," 2023 Inter-Conference Symposium, April 19-21, 2023, Montevideo, Uruguay 338540, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Vargas Meza Xanat & Ke Jiang & George A. Barnett & Han Woo Park, 2018. "International trade of GMO-related agricultural products," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 565-587, March.
    9. Deepayan Debnath & Madhu Khanna & Deepak Rajagopal & David Zilberman, 2019. "The Future of Biofuels in an Electrifying Global Transportation Sector: Imperative, Prospects and Challenges," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 563-582, December.
    10. Baffes, John & Kabundi, Alain, 2023. "Commodity price shocks: Order within chaos?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Perry, Edward D. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2020. "Neonicotinoids in U.S. maize: Insecticide substitution effects and environmental risk," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Jude Anayochukwu Mbanasor & Ogbonnaya Ukeh Oteh & Nnanna Mba Agwu & Chigozirim Ndubuisi Onwusiribe & Nwanneka Cynthia Ibem & Chibuzo Okpokiri & Ambrose Ogbonna Oloveze, 2022. "Wheat or cassava flour? Marketing and willingness to pay for cassava flour confectionery in Nigeria," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(3), pages 1-25.
    13. Amir Nadeem & Hafiz Muhammad Tahir & Azhar Abbas Khan & Atif Idrees & Muhammad Faisal Shahzad & Ziyad Abdul Qadir & Naveed Akhtar & Arif Muhammad Khan & Ayesha Afzal & Jun Li, 2022. "Response of Natural Enemies toward Selective Chemical Insecticides; Used for the Integrated Management of Insect Pests in Cotton Field Plots," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, August.
    14. Md. Sadique Rahman & Monoj Kumar Majumder, 2021. "Drivers of adoption and impacts of an eco-friendly agricultural technology in Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Steven Haggblade & Melinda Smale & Alpha Kergna & Veronique Theriault & Amidou Assima, 2017. "Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(3), pages 648-674, July.
    16. Casper Worm Hansen & Asger Mose Wingender, 2023. "National and Global Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 224-240, June.
    17. Mustapha Alhassan & Christopher R. Gustafson & Karina Schoengold, 2022. "Effects of information on smallholder irrigation farmers’ willingness to pay for groundwater protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 191-203, March.
    18. Linde Inghelbrecht & Gert Goeminne & Guido Huylenbroeck & Joost Dessein, 2017. "When technology is more than instrumental: How ethical concerns in EU agriculture co-evolve with the development of GM crops," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 543-557, September.
    19. Andrzejuk, Adam, 2017. "Comparison of Agriculture Biotechnology and its Spatial Diversification among Different Countries of the World," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ), December.
    20. John Herbert Ainembabazi & Leena Tripathi & Joseph Rusike & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Victor Manyong, 2015. "Ex-Ante Economic Impact Assessment of Genetically Modified Banana Resistant to Xanthomonas Wilt in the Great Lakes Region of Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:276-:d:1044914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.