IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1279-d894505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Approach to the Public Authorities’ Activities Development in the Crop Insurance System: Lithuanian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Rolandas Drejeris

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Martynas Rusteika

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

This article substantiates the structure of the crop insurance system and describes the participants of the insurance system and their activities. The positive impact of crop insurance development on all participants of the system has also been clarified. The aim of the article is to present a methodology for assessing substantiated directs of activity for public authorities in order to make more active crop insurance system performance. The application of the proposed methodology can help to activate crop insurance processes and to expand farmers’ activities and achieve better commercial results of insurance companies. It has been proven that it is beneficial for the public authorities to reinsure farmers’ crops and to refuse to pay direct payments to farmers for the losses incurred. The criteria selected for the assessment of the development directions are relevant to all participants of the insurance system. The research was carried out in a region of Lithuania in which the composition of agricultural business entities corresponds to the situation in the whole agricultural sector of the country. The identification of the insurance system participants and their functions, as well as the use of an expert assessment method with the application of quantitative data processing, showed directions for the activation of crop insurance activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolandas Drejeris & Martynas Rusteika, 2022. "New Approach to the Public Authorities’ Activities Development in the Crop Insurance System: Lithuanian Case," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1279-:d:894505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio & Gómez Gómez, Carlos Mario, 2014. "Drought Management Plans and Water Availability in Agriculture. A Risk Assessment Model for a Southern European Basin," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 177303, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    2. Agnieszka Alińska & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Aneta Kosztowniak, 2018. "The Importance of the Public Sector in Sustainable Development in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Rosanna Salvia & Claire L. Kelly & Geoff A. Wilson & Giovanni Quaranta, 2019. "A Longitudinal Approach to Examining the Socio-Economic Resilience of the Alento District (Italy) to Land Degradation—1950 to Present," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jing & Hu, Guangyin & Wang, Hui & Yang, Xiaoying & Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad & Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan & Bilal, Arshad, 2018. "Empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers crop insurance decisions in Pakistan: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 459-467.
    5. Emanuele Campiglio & Yannis Dafermos & Pierre Monnin & Josh Ryan-Collins & Guido Schotten & Misa Tanaka, 2018. "Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 462-468, June.
    6. Beatriz Velázquez & Bruno Buffaria, 2017. "About farmers’ bargaining power within the new CAP," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Heena Panchasara & Nahidul Hoque Samrat & Nahina Islam, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Naoyuki Yoshino, 2020. "Sustainable Solutions for Green Financing and Investment in Renewable Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Yanfei Bai & Zhongbao Zhou & Rui Gao & Helu Xiao, 2020. "Nash Equilibrium Investment-Reinsurance Strategies for an Insurer and a Reinsurer with Intertemporal Restrictions and Common Interests," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Teece, David J, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 359-368, May.
    11. Biener, Christian & Eling, Martin & Wirfs, Jan Hendrik, 2016. "The determinants of efficiency and productivity in the Swiss insurance industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 703-714.
    12. Gian Paolo Clemente & Pierpaolo Marano, 2020. "The broker model for peer-to-peer insurance: an analysis of its value," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 45(3), pages 457-481, July.
    13. Dadang Jainal Mutaqin & Koichi Usami, 2019. "Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Production Cost Insurance in Rural West Java, Indonesia: A Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Ana Maria Loboguerrero & Bruce M. Campbell & Peter J. M. Cooper & James W. Hansen & Todd Rosenstock & Eva Wollenberg, 2019. "Food and Earth Systems: Priorities for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation for Agriculture and Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Jennifer E Ifft & Todd Kuethe & Mitch Morehart, 2015. "Does federal crop insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS)," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 75(3), pages 349-367, September.
    16. repec:oup:apecpp:v:37:y:2015:i:1:p:107-129 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jerry W. Knox & Steven Wade, 2012. "Assessing climate risks to UK agriculture," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 378-378, June.
    18. Robert L. Winkler & Robert T. Clemen, 2004. "Multiple Experts vs. Multiple Methods: Combining Correlation Assessments," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 167-176, September.
    19. Lucia A. Leone & Sheila Fleischhacker & Betsy Anderson-Steeves & Kaitlyn Harper & Megan Winkler & Elizabeth Racine & Barbara Baquero & Joel Gittelsohn, 2020. "Healthy Food Retail during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Ifft, Jennifer & Kuethe, Todd & Morehart, Mitch, 2015. "Does Federal Crop Insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey," Working Papers 250011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    21. Eleanor Fisher & Jon Hellin & Helen Greatrex & Nathaniel Jensen, 2019. "Index insurance and climate risk management: Addressing social equity," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(5), pages 581-602, September.
    22. Cory G. Walters & C. Richard Shumway & Hayley H. Chouinard & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2015. "Asymmetric Information and Profit Taking in Crop Insurance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 107-129.
    23. Marco Taliento & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2019. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    24. Pérez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio, 2014. "Drought Management Plans and Water Availability in Agriculture. A Risk Assessment Model for a Southern European Basin," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 178240, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    25. Lee, Chi-Chuan & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chiou, Yan-Yu, 2017. "Insurance activities, globalization, and economic growth: New methods, new evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 155-170.
    26. Raéf Bahrini & Alaa A. Qaffas, 2019. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Economic Growth: Evidence from Developing Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martynas Rusteika & Lina Skinulienė, 2023. "Expectations of the Participants of the Crop Insurance System and Their Implementation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Peter Slade, 2021. "The impact of price hedging on subsidized insurance: Evidence from Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(4), pages 447-464, December.
    3. Ifft, Jennifer & Jodlowski, Margaret, 2017. "Federal crop insurance and agricultural credit use," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259120, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2018. "Does crop insurance lead to better environmental practices? Evidence from French farms," Post-Print hal-02048349, HAL.
    5. Burns, Christopher & Prager, Daniel, "undated". "Do Direct Payments and Crop Insurance Influence Commercial Farm Survival and Decisions to Expand?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235693, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Xu, Baochang & Li, Sihui & Afzal, Ayesha & Mirza, Nawazish & Zhang, Meng, 2022. "The impact of financial development on environmental sustainability: A European perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Jacqueline de Almeida Barbosa Franco & Ary Franco Junior & Rosane Aparecida Gomes Battistelle & Barbara Stolte Bezerra, 2024. "Dynamic Capabilities: Unveiling Key Resources for Environmental Sustainability and Economic Sustainability, and Corporate Social Responsibility towards Sustainable Development Goals," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Nathan D. DeLay & Brady Brewer & Allen Featherstone & David Boussios, 2023. "The impact of crop insurance on farm financial outcomes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 579-601, March.
    9. Davide Lanfranchi & Laura Grassi, 2021. "Translating technological innovation into efficiency: the case of US public P&C insurance companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 565-585, December.
    10. Aderajew, Tamirat S. & Du, Xiaoxue & Pennings, Joost M. E. & Trujillo-Barrera, Andres, 2020. "Farm-Level Risk-Balancing Behavior and the Role of Latent Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
    11. Adhikari, Sudip & Khanal, Aditya R., 2020. "Does higher business risk influence financial risk and induce savings among small agricultural operations? Findings from Tennessee," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304509, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Geoffroy Enjolras & Magali Aubert, 2020. "How does crop insurance influence pesticide use? Evidence from French farms," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 461-485, December.
    13. Kristóf, Tamás & Márton, András & Fiáth, Attila, 2023. "Állami energiavállalatok pénzügyi teljesítménye Magyarországon a koronavírus-járvány előtt és alatt [Financial performance of publicly owned energy companies in Hungary before and during the COVID ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1057-1076.
    14. Frederick Murdoch Quaye & Denis Nadolnyak & Valentina Hartarska, 2017. "Factors Affecting Farm Loan Delinquency in the Southeast," Research in Applied Economics, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(4), pages 75-92, December.
    15. Sharma, Sankalp & Bairagi, Subir K., 2021. "Role of Producer Risk-preferences on Debt Undertaking: Evidence from Nebraska," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313998, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Rakhal Sarker & Truc Phan & Yu Na Lee & Alfons Weersink, 2022. "Business Risk Management Program and risk‐balancing in Ontario hog sector: An empirical analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(4), pages 287-304, December.
    17. Kuethe, Todd H. & Paulson, Nicholas & Schnitkey, Gary, 2015. "Crop Insurance’s Role in Farm Solvency," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205662, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Eric J. Belasco & Kate Binzen Fuller, 2022. "Who buys crop insurance? Predictors of the participation gap between organic and conventional farms," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1554-1572, September.
    19. Sarker, Rakhal, 2021. "Farm Safety Net Payments and Risk Balancing in Ontario Beef Sector," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315321, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Roy Kouwenberg & Chenglong Zheng, 2023. "A Review of the Global Climate Finance Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-32, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1279-:d:894505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.