IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i1p29-d474193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Trees to Forecast Risks of Strawberry Powdery Mildew Caused by Podosphaera aphanis

Author

Listed:
  • Odile Carisse

    (Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC J3B 3E6, Canada)

  • Mamadou Lamine Fall

    (Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC J3B 3E6, Canada)

Abstract

Powdery mildew ( Podosphaera aphanis ) is a major disease in day-neutral strawberry. Up to 30% yield losses have been observed in Eastern Canada. Currently, management of powdery mildew is mostly based on fungicide applications without consideration of risk. The objective of this study is to use P . aphanis inoculum, host ontogenic resistance, and weather predictors to forecast the risk of strawberry powdery mildew using CART models (classification trees). The data used to build the trees were collected in 2006, 2007, and 2008 at one experimental farm and six commercial farms located in two main strawberry-production areas, while external validation data were collected at the same experimental farm in 2015, 2016, and 2018. Data on proportion of leaf area diseased (PLAD) were grouped into four severity classes (1: PLAD = 0; 2: PLAD > 0 and <5%; 3: >5% and <15%; and 4: PLAD > 15%) for a total of 681 and 136 cases for training and external validation, respectively. From the initial 92 weather variables, 21 were selected following clustering. The tree with the best balance between the number of predictors and highest accuracy was built with: airborne inoculum concentration and number of susceptible leaves on the day of sampling, and mean relative humidity, mean daily number of hours at temperature between 18 and 30 °C, and mean daily number of hours at saturation vapor pressure between 10 and 25 mmHg during the previous 6 days. For training, internal validation, and external validation datasets, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 0.70 to 0.90, 0.87 to 0.98, and 0.82 to 0.97, respectively. The classification rules to estimate strawberry powdery mildew risk can be easily implemented into disease decision support systems and used to treat only when necessary and thus avoid preventable yield losses and unnecessary treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Odile Carisse & Mamadou Lamine Fall, 2021. "Decision Trees to Forecast Risks of Strawberry Powdery Mildew Caused by Podosphaera aphanis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:29-:d:474193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/29/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/1/29/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Mucherino & Petraq J. Papajorgji & Panos M. Pardalos, 2009. "Data Mining in Agriculture," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-88615-2, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Grégoire & Josée Fortin & Isa Ebtehaj & Hossein Bonakdari, 2022. "Novel Hybrid Statistical Learning Framework Coupled with Random Forest and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm to Forecast Pesticide Use on Golf Courses," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Cuiling Li & Xiu Wang & Liping Chen & Xueguan Zhao & Yang Li & Mingzhou Chen & Haowei Liu & Changyuan Zhai, 2023. "Grading and Detection Method of Asparagus Stem Blight Based on Hyperspectral Imaging of Asparagus Crowns," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chetan Badgujar & Sanjoy Das & Dania Martinez Figueroa & Daniel Flippo, 2023. "Application of Computational Intelligence Methods in Agricultural Soil–Machine Interaction: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-39, January.
    2. Hui Zou & Zhihong Zou & Xiaojing Wang, 2015. "An Enhanced K-Means Algorithm for Water Quality Analysis of The Haihe River in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Orkida Ilollari & Petraq Papajorgji & Adrian Civici & Howard Moskowitz, 2022. "Measuring Client’s Feelings on Mobile Banking," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 28-39, June.
    4. Johannes Berens & Kerstin Schneider & Simon Görtz & Simon Oster & Julian Burghoff, 2018. "Early Detection of Students at Risk – Predicting Student Dropouts Using Administrative Student Data and Machine Learning Methods," CESifo Working Paper Series 7259, CESifo.
    5. Arif Jamal Siddiqui & Sadaf Jahan & Maqsood Ahmed Siddiqui & Andleeb Khan & Mohammed Merae Alshahrani & Riadh Badraoui & Mohd Adnan, 2023. "Targeting Monoamine Oxidase B for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases Using Novel Inhibitors Identified Using an Integrated Approach of Machine Learning and Computer-Aided Drug Desig," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Junlong Zhang & Youbin He & Yuan Zhang & Weifeng Li & Junjie Zhang, 2022. "Well-Logging-Based Lithology Classification Using Machine Learning Methods for High-Quality Reservoir Identification: A Case Study of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Muhammad Islam & Muhammad Usman & Azhar Mahmood & Aaqif Afzaal Abbasi & Oh-Young Song, 2020. "Predictive analytics framework for accurate estimation of child mortality rates for Internet of Things enabled smart healthcare systems," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(5), pages 15501477209, May.
    8. Danijel Jevtic & Romain Deleze & Joerg Osterrieder, 2022. "AI for trading strategies," Papers 2208.07168, arXiv.org.
    9. Orkida Ilollari & Petraq Papajorgji & Ardian Civici, 2024. "Stimulating the Post-COVID-19 Economic Recovery Scenarios to Evaluate Students' Understanding," International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Bohumil Kába, 2011. "Exploratory analysis of selected indicators of the Czech Republic regional labour markets," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 123-128.
    11. Yotsaphat Kittichotsatsawat & Varattaya Jangkrajarng & Korrakot Yaibuathet Tippayawong, 2021. "Enhancing Coffee Supply Chain towards Sustainable Growth with Big Data and Modern Agricultural Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Rafael Rodríguez & Marcos Pastorini & Lorena Etcheverry & Christian Chreties & Mónica Fossati & Alberto Castro & Angela Gorgoglione, 2021. "Water-Quality Data Imputation with a High Percentage of Missing Values: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Zonlehoua Coulibali & Athyna Nancy Cambouris & Serge-Étienne Parent, 2020. "Site-specific machine learning predictive fertilization models for potato crops in Eastern Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Antiopi Panteli & Basilis Boutsinas & Ioannis Giannikos, 2021. "On solving the multiple p-median problem based on biclustering," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 775-799, March.
    15. Lynn Wu & Lorin Hitt & Bowen Lou, 2020. "Data Analytics, Innovation, and Firm Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2017-2039, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:29-:d:474193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.