IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i11p548-d445155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the Winter Pea Crop (Instead of Rapeseed) on Soil Microbial Communities, Nitrogen Balance and Wheat Yield

Author

Listed:
  • Cyrine Rezgui

    (UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France)

  • Wassila Riah-Anglet

    (UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France)

  • Marie Benoit

    (ISARA, Higher Education Institution, 69007 Lyon, France)

  • Pierre Yves Bernard

    (UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France)

  • Karine Laval

    (UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France)

  • Isabelle Trinsoutrot-Gattin

    (UniLaSalle, AGHYLE Research Unit UP 2018.C101, Rouen Team, 3 Rue du Tronquet, F-76134 Mont-Saint Aignan, France)

Abstract

Due to legume-based systems improving several aspects of soil fertility, the diversification of agrosystems using legumes in crop succession is gaining increasing interest. The benefits of legumes aroused the interest of farmers in the association of the Economic and Environmental Interest Group (EEIG), who introduced the idea of using the winter pea instead of rapeseed in their crop succession. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the winter pea compared to those of rapeseed, as a head crop of the rotation, on soil microbial communities, enzyme activities, nitrogen (N) balance and yields. The field experiment involved two farmer plots that were selected within the EEIG. In each plot, two crop successions, including winter pea–wheat and rapeseed–wheat with fertilized and unfertilized strips, were examined for two years. Three times a year, under the wheat crop, composite soil samples were collected at depths of 0–20 cm, for microbial abundance and enzyme activity analyses, and twice a year at a depth of 0–60 cm, for the measuring of the mineral N. The results showed that the rapeseed–wheat succession maintained or enhanced soil bacterial and fungal biomasses and their enzyme activities. The winter pea–wheat succession enriched the soil’s mineral N content more consistently than the rapeseed–wheat succession. The mineral N enhancement’s effect was maintained under the wheat crop. Overall, the impact of the winter pea was positive on the soil’s N dynamics, but wheat yields were equivalent regardless of the previous crop (winter pea or rapeseed with and without fertilization). In the Normandy region, as rapeseed requires a large amount of N fertilizer and pesticide to maintain the yield and quality of crop products, it is suitable to favor the introduction of the winter pea as the head crop of the rotation, which indirectly allows for a reduction in the costs of input production and use, the working time of farmers and environmental pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Cyrine Rezgui & Wassila Riah-Anglet & Marie Benoit & Pierre Yves Bernard & Karine Laval & Isabelle Trinsoutrot-Gattin, 2020. "Impacts of the Winter Pea Crop (Instead of Rapeseed) on Soil Microbial Communities, Nitrogen Balance and Wheat Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:548-:d:445155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/548/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/11/548/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ladislav Holík & Lukáš Hlisnikovský & Roman Honzík & Josef Trögl & Hana Burdová & Jan Popelka, 2019. "Soil Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities after Long-Term Application of Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers at Different Depths of the Soil Profile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Delphine Renard & David Tilman, 2019. "National food production stabilized by crop diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7764), pages 257-260, July.
    3. Marisa Smith & Marco Busi & Peter Ball & Robert Van Der Meer, 2008. "Factors Influencing An Organisation'S Ability To Manage Innovation: A Structured Literature Review And Conceptual Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 655-676.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Dong Sheng & Siyuan Jing & Xueqing He & Alexandra-Maria Klein & Heinz-R. Köhler & Thomas C. Wanger, 2024. "Plastic pollution in agricultural landscapes: an overlooked threat to pollination, biocontrol and food security," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Matteo Zampieri & Andrea Toreti & Andrej Ceglar & Pierluca De Palma & Thomas Chatzopoulos, 2020. "Analysing the resilience of the European commodity production system with PyResPro, the Python Production Resilience package," Papers 2006.08976, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    4. Revoyron, Eva & Le Bail, Marianne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Gunnarsson, Anita & Seghetti, Marco & Colombo, Luca, 2022. "Diversity and drivers of crop diversification pathways of European farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Georgios Giotis & Evangelia Papadionysiou, 2022. "The Role of Managerial and Technological Innovations in the Tourism Industry: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Sidra Salam & Aslan Amat Senin, 2022. "A Bibliometric Study on Innovative Behavior Literature (1961–2019)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    7. Yu, Zhenning & She, Shuoqi & Xia, Chuyu & Luo, Jiaojiao, 2023. "How to solve the dilemma of China’s land fallow policy: Application of voluntary bidding mode in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Katrin Martens & Sebastian Rogga & Jana Zscheischler & Bernd Pölling & Andreas Obersteg & Annette Piorr, 2022. "Classifying New Hybrid Cooperation Models for Short Food-Supply Chains—Providing a Concept for Assessing Sustainability Transformation in the Urban-Rural Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Marie-Benoît Magrini & Tristan Salord & Guillaume Cabanac, 2023. "The unbalanced development among legume species regarding sustainable and healthy agrifood systems in North-America and Europe: focus on food product innovations," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 187-200, February.
    10. Wei Wang & Xin Luo & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "Can Land Transfer Alleviate the Poverty of the Elderly? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Minkyu Song & Boyoung Kim, 2024. "An Analysis of Critical Factors Affecting the Success of Open Innovation Strategies in High-Tech Firms: The Case of South Korea," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn & Joanna Lesniowska, 2023. "Introducing the open innovation model in Polish biopharmaceutical companies: major drivers and barriers," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 51-77.
    13. Erstu Tarko Kassa & Tilahun Getnet Mirete, 2022. "Exploring factors that determine the innovation of micro and small enterprises: the role of entrepreneurial attitude towards innovation in Woldia, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2017. "Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Lilan Lu & Chaoqun Tong & Yingying Liu & Weibo Yang, 2024. "Analysis of Physicochemical Properties, Enzyme Activity, Microbial Diversity in Rhizosphere Soil of Coconut ( Cocos nucifera L.) Under Organic and Chemical Fertilizers, Irrigation Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Sisay S. Mekonen & Scott E. Boyce & Abdella K. Mohammed & Lorraine Flint & Alan Flint & Markus Disse, 2023. "Recharge Estimation Approach in a Data-Scarce Semi-Arid Region, Northern Ethiopian Rift Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Domingo García Pérez-De-Lema & Peter Bent Hansen & Antonia Madrid-Gujjarro & Jane Lucia Silva-Santos, 2019. "INFLUENCE OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE DYNAMICS OF INNOVATION AND IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Matthew C. LaFevor & Aoife K. Pitts, 2022. "Irrigation Increases Crop Species Diversity in Low-Diversity Farm Regions of Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Ramon B. Narcizo & Alberto G. Canen & Iara Tammela, 2017. "A conceptual framework to represent the theoretical domain of “innovation capability” in organizations," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 147-166.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:548-:d:445155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.