IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v8y2018i3p46-d164528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Employee Innovative Behavior and Thriving at Work: A Chinese Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sidra Riaz

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Yusen Xu

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Shahid Hussain

    (Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Attock 43600, Pakistan)

Abstract

Drawing from the tenets of social cognitive theory, the present study examined the effect of thriving at work on innovation behavior via organizational support of innovation. The data were collected at three points in time from 402 participants occupying a variety of positions in Chinese organizations. Structural equation modeling and multilevel regression analysis results demonstrated that employees’ thriving was positively related to organizational support of innovation, which in turn was positively related to innovative behavior. In addition, moderated mediation results demonstrated that employee external contacts strengthened the relationship between organizational support of innovation and innovative behavior, and enhanced the positive effects of thriving. Our results deepen and go beyond previous research on thriving at work. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidra Riaz & Yusen Xu & Shahid Hussain, 2018. "Understanding Employee Innovative Behavior and Thriving at Work: A Chinese Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:46-:d:164528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/3/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/3/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ching-Sung Lee & Yen-Cheng Chen & Pei-Ling Tsui & Tung-Han Yu, 2014. "Erratum to: Examining the relations between open innovation climate and job satisfaction with a PLS path model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2373-2373, July.
    2. S. Terzi & A. Trezzini & L. Moroni, 2014. "A PLS path model to investigate the relations between institutions and human development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1271-1290, May.
    3. Liang-Hung Lin & Yu-Ling Ho, 2010. "Guanxi and OCB: The Chinese Cases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 285-298, October.
    4. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    5. Van de Ven, Andrew R., 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Agricultural Research Policy Seminar 139708, University of Minnesota Extension.
    6. Gretchen Spreitzer & Kathleen Sutcliffe & Jane Dutton & Scott Sonenshein & Adam M. Grant, 2005. "A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 537-549, October.
    7. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 590-607, May.
    9. M Patterson & P Warr & M West, 2004. "Organizational Climate and Company Productivity: the Role of Employee Affect and Employee Level," CEP Discussion Papers dp0626, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    11. Ching-Sung Lee & Yen-Cheng Chen & Pei-Ling Tsui & Tung-Han Yu, 2014. "Examining the relations between open innovation climate and job satisfaction with a PLS path model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1705-1722, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nada Alwahhabi & Suad Dukhaykh & Wadi B. Alonazi, 2023. "Thriving at Work as a Mediator of the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Tri Ho Thanh & Nga Vo Thi & Sipko Juraj, 2019. "Predicting overall Staffs’ Creativity and Innovative Work Behavior in Banking," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 188-202, June.
    3. Khoa T. Tran & Phuong V. Nguyen & Linh M. Nguyen, 2018. "The Role of Financial Slack, Employee Creative Self-Efficacy and Learning Orientation in Innovation and Organizational Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Hasan Farid & Yang Zhang & Ming Tian & Jamshed Raza & Shiyao Lu, 2023. "Unveiling the job characteristics-creativity rapport through the bridge of thriving: a self-determination perspective from the Chinese hospitality sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sidra Riaz & Yusen Xu & Shahid Hussain, 2019. "Workplace Ostracism and Knowledge Hiding: The Mediating Role of Job Tension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Christel Lane & Daniela Lup, 2015. "Cooking under Fire: Managing Multilevel Tensions between Creativity and Innovation in Haute Cuisine," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 654-676, November.
    3. Jan Mattsson & Helge Helmersson & Katarina Stetler, 2016. "Motivation Fatigue As A Threat To Innovation: Bypassing The Productivity Dilemma In R&D By Cyclic Production," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Ewelina Zarzycka & Justyna Dobroszek & Lauri Lepistö & Sinikka Moilanen, 2019. "Coexistence of innovation and standardization: evidence from the lean environment of business process outsourcing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 251-286, October.
    5. Marlenne G. Velazquez-Cazares & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Ernesto Leon-Castro & Fabio Blanco-Mesa, 2021. "Innovation capabilities measurement using fuzzy methodologies: a Colombian SMEs case," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 384-413, December.
    6. Rachel Bocquet & Sandra Dubouloz, 2020. "Firm Openness and Managerial Innovation: Rebalancing Deliberate Actions and Institutional Pressures," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 43-74.
    7. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    8. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "What Makes Employees Behave Innovatively? Empirical Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Černe, Matej & Kaše, Robert & Škerlavaj, Miha, 2016. "Non-technological innovation research: evaluating the intellectual structure and prospects of an emerging field," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 69-85.
    10. Azmat, Fara & Lim, Weng Marc & Moyeen, Abdul & Voola, Ranjit & Gupta, Girish, 2023. "Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Aramburu, Nekane & Sáenz, Josune & Blanco, Carlos E., 2015. "Structural capital, innovation capability, and company performance in technology-based colombian firms," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    12. Xavier Castañer, 2016. "Redefining Creativity And Innovation In Organisations: Suggestions For Redirecting Research," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Černe, Matej & Jaklič, Marko & Škerlavaj, Miha, 2013. "Decoupling management and technological innovations: Resolving the individualism–collectivism controversy," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 103-117.
    14. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    15. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    16. Meyerding, Stephan G.H., 2017. "Analyzing job satisfaction and preferences of employees: the case of horticultural companies in Germany," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(5).
    17. Jean-Philippe Denis & Frank Tannery, 2002. "L'architecture des systèmes de contrôle de la stratégie dans les groupes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 69-114, September.
    18. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.
    19. Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait & Caroline Urbain, 2004. "La compétence du créateur d’entreprise innovante : quelles interrogations?," Post-Print hal-01416605, HAL.
    20. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:46-:d:164528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.