IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v8y2018i1p6-d135794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm Readiness Level for Innovation Projects: A New Decision-Making Tool for Innovation Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Galvez

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Santiago de Chile, 9170124 Santiago, Chile)

  • Manon Enjolras

    (Équipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs, ERPI, Université de Lorraine, ERPI, F-54000 Nancy, France)

  • Mauricio Camargo

    (Équipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs, ERPI, Université de Lorraine, ERPI, F-54000 Nancy, France)

  • Vincent Boly

    (Équipe de Recherche sur les Processus Innovatifs, ERPI, Université de Lorraine, ERPI, F-54000 Nancy, France)

  • Johan Claire

    (Innovation Way, F-54000 Nancy, France)

Abstract

Innovation projects represent a major challenge for business managers due to their associated uncertainty degree. The already existing methodologies to support the innovation projects are aimed at piloting them and establishing the management stages in a flexible and agile way during their deployment. This paper proposes a complementary ex-ante methodology that seeks to aid the decision-making of companies to choose whether or not to launch a potential innovation project. This methodology evaluates to what extent the technological system of the company has the minimum required maturity degree of competencies to successfully achieve the innovation project. Thus, in first instance, an innovation project is characterized according to its novelty degree; both inside the company and in its environment. Subsequently, according to the previous characterization, the future project will have an impact on the technological system of the company. The capabilities of the firm are represented by a set of good practices associated with the innovation projects’ management that the company is able to deploy. Finally, the minimum maturity degree required by a particular project of these practices is determined. Then, the gap between the maturity requirement profile and the current profile of the company is established enabling to decide on the implementation of the project or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Galvez & Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Vincent Boly & Johan Claire, 2018. "Firm Readiness Level for Innovation Projects: A New Decision-Making Tool for Innovation Managers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:6-:d:135794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/8/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antunes, Pedro & Carreira, Paulo & Mira da Silva, Miguel, 2014. "Towards an energy management maturity model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 803-814.
    2. García-Quevedo, José & Segarra-Blasco, Agustí & Teruel, Mercedes, 2018. "Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 127-140.
    3. Cooper, Robert G., 1990. "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 44-54.
    4. Paulo Antônio Zawislak & Jorge Tello Gamarra & André Cherubini Alves & Denise Barbieux & Fernanda Maciel Reichert, 2014. "The different innovation capabilities of the firm: further remarks upon the Brazilian experience," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 129-150.
    5. Santos, David Ferreira Lopes & Basso, Leonardo Fernando Cruz & Kimura, Herbert & Kayo, Eduardo Kazuo, 2014. "Innovation efforts and performances of Brazilian firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 527-535.
    6. Boly, Vincent & Morel, Laure & Assielou, N’Doli Guillaume & Camargo, Mauricio, 2014. "Evaluating innovative processes in french firms: Methodological proposition for firm innovation capacity evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 608-622.
    7. Vincent Boly & Laure Morel & Mauricio Camargo, 2012. "Improving performance evaluation metrics to manage innovative projects," Post-Print hal-00724126, HAL.
    8. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaoutar Jamai & Ali Abidar & Hans De Steur & Xavier Gellynck, 2022. "Assessing Firm Readiness to Adopt Cluster-Based Innovative Projects: A Segmentation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Mauricio Camargo & Laure Morel & Pascal Lhoste, 2021. "Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership," Post-Print hal-03140931, HAL.
    3. Kucher, Lesia & Hełdak, Maria & Orochovska, Lyudmila, 2023. "Assessment of the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen González-Velasco & Marcos González-Fernández & José-Luis Fanjul-Suárez, 2019. "Does innovative effort matter for corporate performance in Spanish companies in a context of financial crisis? A fuzzy-set QCA approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 1707-1727, May.
    2. Coccia, Mario, 2023. "New Perspectives in Innovation Failure Analysis: A taxonomy of general errors and strategic management for reducing risks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Jayasundara, JMSB & Rajapakshe, PSK & Prasanna, RPIR & Naradda Gamage, Sisira Kumara & Ekanayake, EMS & Abeyrathne, GAKNJ, 2019. "The Nature of Sustainability Challenge in Small and Medium Enterprises and its Management," MPRA Paper 98418, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    5. Nguyen, Huu Le & Larimo, Jorma & Wang, Yi, 2019. "Control, innovation and international joint venture performance: The moderating role of internal and external environments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    6. Wilson, Grant Alexander & Case, Tyler & Dobni, C. Brooke, 2023. "A global study of innovation-oriented firms: Dimensions, practices, and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Asimakopoulos, Grigorios & Revilla, Antonio & Rodríguez, Alicia, 2023. "International R&D sourcing, innovation and firm age: The advantage of ‘born-international sourcers’," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Zhelyu Vladimirov, 2021. "Mediating Role of Innovations as a Factor of Firm’s Competitiveness," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 407-429, September.
    9. Pielow, Cornelia & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2016. "Strategic CSR in food industry SMEs: identifying individual hot spots," 26th International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA) World Forum, 2016, Aarhus, Denmark 275887, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association (IFAMA).
    10. González-Fernández, Marcos & González-Velasco, Carmen, 2018. "Innovation and corporate performance in the Spanish regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 998-1021.
    11. Manon Enjolras & Mauricio Camargo & Christophe Schmitt, 2020. "Evaluating Innovation and Export Capabilities of SMEs: Toward a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology," Post-Print hal-03000609, HAL.
    12. Naradda Gamage, Sisira Kumara & Ekanayake, EMS & Abeyrathne, GAKNJ & Prasanna, RPIR & Jayasundara, JMSB & Rajapakshe, PSK, 2019. "Global Challenges and Survival Strategies of the SMEs in the Era of Economic Globalization: A Systematic Review," MPRA Paper 98419, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Păunescu Carmen & Blid Laura, 2016. "Effective energy planning for improving the enterprise’s energy performance," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 512-531, September.
    15. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    16. Frida Thomas Pacho, 2018. "Diversified Network Effects on Innovation Performance in Tanzania: Innovation Strategy in Service Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, Macrothink Institute, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    17. Kafigi Jeje, 2020. "Risk-Taking and Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Lessons from Tanzanian Bakeries," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22.
    18. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.
    19. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    20. Francesco Ciampi & Alessandro Giannozzi & Giacomo Marzi & Edward I. Altman, 2021. "Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2141-2188, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:6-:d:135794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.