IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i9p221-d1477567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Knowledge-Sharing Behavior: The Role of Trust in the Leader and Employee Promotive Voice Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Vítor Hugo Silva

    (DINÂMIA’CET-Centro de Estudos sobre a Mudança Socioeconómica e Território, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
    Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Ana Patrícia Duarte

    (ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Luís Miguel Simões

    (ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

As the organizational environment becomes more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, and the economy becomes increasingly knowledge-based, organizational knowledge management is key for companies’ success. This is especially important as organizational ties are weaker and job-hopping becomes a more prevalent phenomenon. As human resource mobility increases, companies must ensure that knowledge remains within the company despite employee exit. In this context, the current study sought to understand how leaders’ actions can facilitate employee knowledge sharing, focusing on paradoxical leadership. Besides examining the impact of paradoxical leadership on employees’ propensity to adopt knowledge-sharing behaviors, this study also explored the effects of one potential intervening variable (i.e., promotive voice behavior) and one potential boundary condition (i.e., trust in the leader) on this relationship. A two-wave time-lagged correlational study was conducted with a sample of 154 workers from various sectors. The results of moderated mediation analysis suggest that paradoxical leaders indirectly promote greater knowledge-sharing among subordinates by fostering their promotive-voice behaviors, but only for those with high levels of trust in the leader. The implications of these findings for current organizational challenges regarding knowledge management are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Vítor Hugo Silva & Ana Patrícia Duarte & Luís Miguel Simões, 2024. "The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Knowledge-Sharing Behavior: The Role of Trust in the Leader and Employee Promotive Voice Behavior," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:221-:d:1477567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/9/221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsin-Hua Hsiung, 2012. "Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 349-361, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inmaculada Silla & Francisco J. Gracia & José M. Peiró, 2020. "Upward Voice: Participative Decision Making, Trust in Leadership and Safety Climate Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Giles Hirst & Fred Walumbwa & Samuel Aryee & Ivan Butarbutar & Chin Jeffery Hui Chen, 2016. "A Multi-level Investigation of Authentic Leadership as an Antecedent of Helping Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 485-499, December.
    3. Sergio Edú Valsania & Juan A. Moriano & Fernando Molero, 2016. "Authentic leadership and intrapreneurial behavior: cross-level analysis of the mediator effect of organizational identification and empowerment," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 131-152, March.
    4. Xiaoshuang Lin & Zhen Xiong Chen & Herman H. M. Tse & Wu Wei & Chao Ma, 2019. "Why and When Employees Like to Speak up More Under Humble Leaders? The Roles of Personal Sense of Power and Power Distance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 937-950, September.
    5. Weng Marc Lim & Nishtha Malik & Sahil Gupta & Himanshu Rai, 2024. "Harnessing brand authenticity to promote prosocial service behavior," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(4), pages 449-468, July.
    6. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    7. Jeong Sik Kim & Jong Gyu Park & Hyun Jung Park, 2022. "Linking Authentic Leadership With Employee Initiative Behavior and Task Performance: The Mediating Role of Emotional Sharing and Communication Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    8. Eko Yi Liao & Chun Hui, 2021. "A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 317-370, March.
    9. Sheng-min Liu & Jian-qiao Liao & Hongguo Wei, 2015. "Authentic Leadership and Whistleblowing: Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Personal Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 107-119, September.
    10. Nidhi Yadav & Shikha Dixit, 2017. "Authentic Leadership and Employees’ Work-related Quality of Life: A Study of IT Organizations in India," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 222-222, March.
    11. Mavis Agyemang Opoku & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Psychological Safety in Ghana: Empirical Analyses of Antecedents and Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Yunfeng Sun & Hao Yang & Chongyang Qian & Yifeng Jiang & Xiaowei Luo & Xiang Wu, 2022. "Voice Endorsement and Employee Safety Voice Behavior in Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Xiaowan Lin, 2015. "How does procedural justice climate influence individual outcomes? An affective perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 771-800, September.
    14. Yuanjie Bao & Chaoping Li, 2019. "From moral leadership to positive work behaviors: the mediating roles of value congruence and leader-member exchange," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.
    16. Muhammad Zia-ur Rehman & Atiqa Shahbaz & Noor Hassan, 2018. "Due Economy is Based on Authenticity? Authentic Leader9apos9s Personality and Employees9apos9 Voice Behaviour," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(2), pages 43-54, December.
    17. Asma Nisar & Tahira Hassan Butt & Ghulam Abid & Saira Farooqi & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi, 2020. "Impact of grit on voice behavior: mediating role of organizational commitment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Beena Prakash Nair & T. Prasad & Shreekumar K. Nair, 2022. "Authentic Leadership and Team Members’ Outcomes: A Cross-level and Multi-level Analysis," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 47(2), pages 165-182, May.
    19. Shihong Cao & Hong Zhang & Qi Chen, 2024. "Leader Fault Tolerance and Employees’ Green Silent Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Ownership and Moral Disengagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Wang Ro Lee & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2021. "How Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Job Autonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:221-:d:1477567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.