IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i7p134-d1422714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Past, Present, and Future of Cross-Border Cooperation between Municipalities in the South Bohemian Region: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří Dušek

    (Department of Management of Public Administration, The College of European and Regional Studies, Žižkova tř. 1632/5b, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive view of matters of cross-border cooperation, with the main emphasis on the typology and development of structures supporting cross-border cooperation in a selected region of the Czech Republic (South Bohemian Region). The study focuses on the analysis of changes in the methods and ways of cooperation of municipalities in the programming periods 2007–2013 and 2014–2020 (Euroregions, cross-border impulse centers, European territorial cooperation groups, partner and friendly cities, etc.). The research not only analyzes the actual development of cooperation between municipalities in the region studied, but also identifies the prerequisites of and barriers to cross-border cooperation. The data obtained show a significant decrease in the interest of municipalities in cross-border cooperation within the conditions of the Czech Republic in recent years. The current situation with regard to the existence and development of cross-border cooperation in 2024 is not very satisfactory, although it is paradoxically an area strongly supported by the EU Cohesion Policy. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide a comprehensive analysis of cross-border cooperation in the South Bohemian Region. A thorough review of existing literature on cross-border cooperation and related policies was conducted to establish a theoretical framework. The practical part of the study is based on field research carried out by the author in 2007–2013 and 2014–2020. This research examined the level of cooperation between the 623 municipalities in the South Bohemian Region (in 2016, there were 624 municipalities in the region). In the case of cross-border impulse centers, the input data were represented by e-mail and telephone inquiries to representatives of individual municipalities and the websites of Euroregions. To conduct a comprehensive study on cross-border cooperation between municipalities in the South Bohemian Region, logical and scientific methods were used. Universal methods of logic ensured the correctness and orderliness of the thought process, with abstraction identifying key elements. Synthesis was used to divide the study into parts, analyze them in detail, and integrate them into a comprehensive analysis. Scientific methods included analysis to examine the current status and frameworks of cross-border cooperation and comparison to identify similarities or differences between the Czech Republic and neighboring countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří Dušek, 2024. "The Past, Present, and Future of Cross-Border Cooperation between Municipalities in the South Bohemian Region: A Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:134-:d:1422714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/7/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2019. "Measuring the impact of legal and administrative international barriers on regional growth," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 345-366, June.
    2. Micaela Antunes & Miguel Viegas & Celeste Varum & Carlos Pinho, 2020. "The Impact of Structural Funds on Regional Growth: A Panel Data Spatial Analysis," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(5), pages 312-319, September.
    3. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    4. Daniel Rauhut & Alois Humer, 2020. "EU Cohesion Policy and spatial economic growth: trajectories in economic thought," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 2116-2133, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiganasu, Ramona & Lupu, Dan, 2023. "Institutional quality and digitalization: Drivers in accessing European funds at regional level?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Mirko Kruse & Melanie Mesloh & Jan Wedemeier, 2022. "Smart Specialisation and Resilience: How Future-Proof are European Regions?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(1), pages 34-50, JUNE.
    3. Christophe Sohn & Julien Licheron & Evert Meijers, 2022. "Border cities: Out of the shadow," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(2), pages 417-438, April.
    4. Anggi Rahajeng & Wihana Kirana Jaya & Evita Hanie Pangaribowo & Muhadjir Darwin, 2024. "Assessment of regional development pattern towards sustainability urban areas: empirical evidence from Yogyakarta urban areas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25827-25848, October.
    5. Wasilewski Adam & Krzyżanowski Julian & Chmieliński Paweł, 2021. "Complementarity of the Measures of the Common Agricultural Policy and the Cohesion Policy for Rural Development Between 2021 And 2027 in the Light of Programing Documents," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 319674, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    6. Agata Pierscieniak & Mariola Grzebyk, 2020. "Searching Key Macro-Factors for Cooperation in Cross-Border Tourism: Institutional Matrix vs. PEST Concept," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 249-259.
    7. Francesca Crucitti & Nicholas-Joseph Lazarou & Philippe Monfort & Simone Salotti, 2021. "A scenario analysis of the 2021-2027 European Cohesion Policy in Bulgaria and its regions," JRC Working Papers on Territorial Modelling and Analysis 2021-06, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Wawrzyniak & Maciej Oesterreich, 2022. "Competitiveness of the Regions of the European Union in a Sustainable Knowledge-Based Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(5), pages 485-513, October.
    10. Wenzheng Li & Stephan Schmidt & Stefan Siedentop, 2024. "Can polycentric urban development simultaneously achieve both economic growth and regional equity? A multi-scale analysis of German regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(2), pages 525-545, March.
    11. Scotti, Francesco & Flori, Andrea & Pammolli, Fabio, 2022. "The economic impact of structural and Cohesion Funds across sectors: Immediate, medium-to-long term effects and spillovers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Sergio Destefanis & Valter Di Giacinto, 2022. "EU structural funds and GDP per capita: Spatial VAR evidence for the European regions," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2022-09, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised Oct 2024.
    13. Marko Šostar & Vladimir Ristanović & Chamaru de Alwis, 2023. "Application of Successful EU Funds Absorption Models to Sustainable Regional Development," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Nikolitsa Spilioti & Athanasios Anastasiou, 2024. "European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs) and Regional Development across the European Union (EU)," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    16. Karlheinz Knickel & Alexandra Almeida & Francesca Galli & Kerstin Hausegger-Nestelberger & Bryonny Goodwin-Hawkins & Mojca Hrabar & Daniel Keech & Marina Knickel & Olli Lehtonen & Damian Maye & Irune , 2021. "Transitioning towards a Sustainable Wellbeing Economy—Implications for Rural–Urban Relations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Andrea Caragliu, 2022. "Better together: Untapped potentials in Central Europe," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1051-1085, October.
    18. Maras Marin, 2022. "The spillover effect of European Union funds between the regions of the new European Union members," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 58-72, June.
    19. Roberto Fazioli & Francesca Pantaleone, 2021. "Macroeconomic Factors Influencing Public Policy Strategies for Blue and Green Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Roberto Fazioli & Francesca Pantaleone, 2021. "Macroeconomic factors influencing public policy strategies for Blue and Green Hydrogen," Working Papers 20210510, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:134-:d:1422714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.