IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2024i4p61-d1362030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer-Based Brand Equity Drivers: A Leading Brand of Beer in Estonia

Author

Listed:
  • Dafnis N. Coudounaris

    (Department of Marketing, Hanken School of Economics, 65101 Vaasa, Finland
    Global Online MBA Programmes, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK)

  • Peter Björk

    (Department of Marketing, Hanken School of Economics, 65101 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Tõnis Mets

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Rustam Asadli

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, 51009 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Andreea I. Bujac

    (Department of Business and Sustainability, University of Southern Denmark, 6000 Kolding, Denmark
    Aalborg University Business School, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

Based on the trust/commitment theory and the customer-based brand equity theory, this study aims to ascertain which of the brand equity drivers of A. Le Coq beer have an impact on attachment and its overall brand equity in the Estonian brewery market. In order to achieve this goal, an empirical study was conducted based on the 17 customer-based/consumer-based brand equity models: the 15 brand equity models, including the beer/beverage brand equity models, the 2 internal brand equity models, as well as 3 other related models. The study utilised a sample of convenience of 120 University of Tartu students. The questionnaire was placed on Google’s online survey administration service. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) through AMOS29 was used for testing the fit of the model and covariances (through AMOS29) were used for testing the hypotheses. Additionally, t -test analysis was used for the differences in the means between the demographic characteristics and the items of the model. The results show that brand meaning has a strong positive effect on attachment strength, which significantly influences relationship factors—commitment, trust, and satisfaction. Another major finding is that the relationship factors—commitment, trust, and satisfaction—play a significant role in the development of the brand equity of A. Le Coq beer. This study provides useful insights for brewery marketing managers by exploiting the strong positive relationships found between beer brand equity drivers, such as the strong positive relationships found within consumers of beer, i.e., the relationships between brand reputation and brand image, brand meaning and attachment strength, attachment strength and commitment, attachment strength and satisfaction, attachment strength and trust, satisfaction and brand equity, commitment and brand equity, and trust and brand equity. This finding contributes to the literature on brand equity related to the Estonian environment. Five differences in demographic characteristics seem to play a role in designing strategies by the management teams of different brands for increasing the consumption of their competing brands of beer. A replication of a model previously used for a non-product is part of the novelty of this paper. In addition, all the examined relationships are found to be positive and significant, which provides a contribution to the existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Dafnis N. Coudounaris & Peter Björk & Tõnis Mets & Rustam Asadli & Andreea I. Bujac, 2024. "Customer-Based Brand Equity Drivers: A Leading Brand of Beer in Estonia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-40, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:61-:d:1362030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/4/61/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/4/61/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Payne, Adrian & Storbacka, Kaj & Frow, Pennie & Knox, Simon, 2009. "Co-creating brands: Diagnosing and designing the relationship experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 379-389, March.
    2. Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Christodoulides, George, 2020. "The consumer-based brand equity deconstruction and restoration process: Lessons from unliked brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-51.
    3. Keller, Kevin Lane, 2003. "Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 595-600, March.
    4. Ravi K. Jillapalli & Regina Jillapalli, 2014. "Do professors have customer-based brand equity?," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 22-40, June.
    5. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 378-389, December.
    6. Coudounaris, Dafnis N. & Orero-Blat, María & Rodríguez-García, María, 2020. "Three decades of subsidiary exits: Parent firm financial performance and moderators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 408-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Högström, Claes & Gustafsson, Anders & Tronvoll, Bård, 2015. "Strategic brand management: Archetypes for managing brands through paradoxes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 391-404.
    2. da Silveira, Catherine & Lages, Carmen & Simões, Cláudia, 2013. "Reconceptualizing brand identity in a dynamic environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 28-36.
    3. Yi He & Qimei Chen & Dana L. Alden, 2016. "Time will tell: managing post-purchase changes in brand attitude," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 791-805, November.
    4. Teresa Barros & Paula Rodrigues & Nelson Duarte & Xue-Feng Shao & F. V. Martins & H. Barandas-Karl & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2020. "The Impact of Brand Relationships on Corporate Brand Identity and Reputation—An Integrative Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Khalifa, Dina & Shukla, Paurav, 2021. "When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 110-121.
    6. Koivisto, Elina & Mattila, Pekka, 2020. "Extending the luxury experience to social media – User-Generated Content co-creation in a branded event," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 570-578.
    7. Matthew Hawkins, 2015. "Market Identification to Generation: A Practice Theory Market Orientation," Post-Print hal-01507884, HAL.
    8. Yi Xie & Siqing Peng & Daniel P. Hampson, 0. "Brand user imagery clarity (BUIC): conceptualization, measurement, and consequences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    9. Bastian Atzger & Elisabete S. Sá & Joaquim Silva, 0. "Exploring sources of voter-based political human brand equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    10. Ramaswamy, Venkat & Ozcan, Kerimcan, 2016. "Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 93-106.
    11. Nguyen, Hang T. & Feng, Hui, 2021. "Antecedents and financial impacts of building brand love," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 572-592.
    12. Andreini, Daniela & Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Zarantonello, Lia & Solerio, Chiara, 2019. "Reprint of "A renaissance of brand experience: Advancing the concept through a multi-perspective analysis"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 355-365.
    13. Cleopatra Veloutsou, 2023. "Enlightening the brand building–audience response link," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(6), pages 550-566, November.
    14. Bastian Atzger & Elisabete S. Sá & Joaquim Silva, 2020. "Exploring sources of voter-based political human brand equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 481-494, July.
    15. Arnold Japutra & Keni Keni & Bang Nguyen, 2016. "What’s in a university logo? Building commitment in higher education," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 137-152, March.
    16. Vallaster, Christine & von Wallpach, Sylvia, 2013. "An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1505-1515.
    17. Xin Xu & James Y. L. Thong & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2014. "Effects of ICT Service Innovation and Complementary Strategies on Brand Equity and Customer Loyalty in a Consumer Technology Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 710-729, December.
    18. Andreini, Daniela & Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Zarantonello, Lia & Solerio, Chiara, 2018. "A renaissance of brand experience: Advancing the concept through a multi-perspective analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 123-133.
    19. Jones, Robert & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2011. "Single-brand retailers: Building brand loyalty in the off-line environment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 333-340.
    20. Paula Rodríguez–Torrico & Sonia San-Martín & Rebeca San José Cabezudo, 2022. "¿Conectamos? El marketing relacional en la era del mix de canales," DOCFRADIS Working Papers 2204, Catedra Fundación Ramón Areces de Distribución Comercial, revised Jul 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:61-:d:1362030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.