IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v14y2023i1p8-d1309220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Culture, Knowledge, and Commitment to Digital Transformation and Its Impact on the Competitiveness of Portuguese Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • António Cardoso

    (Department of Business and Communication Sciences (DBCS), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), 4294-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Manuel Sousa Pereira

    (Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4930-600 Valença, Portugal)

  • José Carlos Sá

    (Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto-ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Daryl John Powell

    (Department of Product and Production Development, SINTEF Manufacturing AS, 2830 Raufoss, Norway)

  • Silvia Faria

    (Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies (REMIT), Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

  • Miguel Magalhães

    (Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies (REMIT), Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the impact of digital culture on companies’ knowledge and constant commitment to digital transformation, as well as its impact on organizations as a whole. Secondly, it aimed to explore the impact of digital technology adoption on organizational performance and competitiveness. Finally, the study investigated the role of knowledge management during digital transformation. A quantitative study was developed using a descriptive design. A questionnaire was developed on pre-test was carried out withon 15 participants and since no doubts or difficulties were detected, it was made available on the internet between January and April 2022. A total of 291 questionnaires were collected and validated. Data were imported from Google Forms for analysis in SPSS, version 25.0, andSmartPLS ® 4.0 software. The questionnaire revealed good internal consistency (α = 0.922). Ten of the twelve hypotheses were confirmed, that is, the existence of positive and significant relationships between digital culture (DC) and knowledge of digital transformation (KDT); DC and adoption of digital technologies (ADT); DC and knowledge management (KM); commitment (C) and KDT; C and productivity (P); KDT and ADT; ADT and KM; ADT and P; ADT and C; and P and C. The results of regression analyses showed that the variables that contributed to the model (“competitiveness of organizations”) were productivity, the adoption of digital technologies, commitment to digital technologies, and knowledge management. The variables CD and KDT (Knowledge of digital transformation) presented lower and non-significant values.

Suggested Citation

  • António Cardoso & Manuel Sousa Pereira & José Carlos Sá & Daryl John Powell & Silvia Faria & Miguel Magalhães, 2023. "Digital Culture, Knowledge, and Commitment to Digital Transformation and Its Impact on the Competitiveness of Portuguese Organizations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:8-:d:1309220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/1/8/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/14/1/8/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milgrom, Paul R & Qian, Yingyi & Roberts, John, 1991. "Complementarities, Momentum, and the Evolution of Modern Manufacturing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 84-88, May.
    2. Stephen A. McLaughlin, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities: taking an emerging technology perspective," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1/2/3), pages 62-81.
    3. Manfreda, Anton & Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles in the smart city era: An empirical study of adoption factors important for millennials," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Olivia McDermott & Ida Foley & Jiju Antony & Michael Sony & Mary Butler, 2022. "The Impact of Industry 4.0 on the Medical Device Regulatory Product Life Cycle Compliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Jaklič, Jurij & Grublješič, Tanja & Popovič, Aleš, 2018. "The role of compatibility in predicting business intelligence and analytics use intentions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 305-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irena Mladenova, 2024. "SMEs in a Digital Era: The Role of Management," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanco Callejo, M, 2007. "LA VENTA DE LA ILUSIÓN Y “LA BRUJA DE ORO”: EL EMBRUJO DE UN CÍRCULO VIRTUOSOi /," Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 13(3), pages 33-56.
    2. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    3. Zand, Fardad & Van Beers, Cees & Van Leeuwen, George, 2011. "Information technology, organizational change and firm productivity: A panel study of complementarity effects and clustering patterns in Manufacturing and Services," MPRA Paper 46469, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giuseppe Caragnano & Fabrizio Bertone & Luca Vernetti-Prot & Olivier Terzo, 2022. "Traceability Platform Based on Green Blockchain: An Application Case Study in Dairy Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Bağış, Mehmet & Kryeziu, Liridon & Akbaba, Yılmaz & Ramadani, Veland & Karagüzel, Ensar Selman & Krasniqi, Besnik A., 2022. "The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Flavio Toxvaerd & Chryssi Giannitsarou, 2004. "Recursive global games," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2003 104, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.
    8. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    9. Federico Echenique, 2002. "Comparative Statics by Adaptive Dynamics and the Correspondence Principle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 833-844, March.
    10. Richard Arena & Pierre Garrouste, 2007. "Market or Markets?," ICER Working Papers 35-2007, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    11. Johannes Sedlmeir & Jonathan Lautenschlager & Gilbert Fridgen & Nils Urbach, 2022. "The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1779-1794, September.
    12. Jack A. Nickerson & Todd R. Zenger, 2002. "Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 547-566, October.
    13. Alberto Battistini, 2019. "Appearances do mislead: Marxist economic theory and the demise of labour theory of value.Part two: Das Kapital au contraire," Department of Economics University of Siena 817, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Ben-Elia, Eran & Alexander, Bayarma & Hubers, Christa & Ettema, Dick, 2014. "Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: An exploratory Path Analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 56-74.
    15. Shakina, Elena & Parshakov, Petr & Alsufiev, Artem, 2021. "Rethinking the corporate digital divide: The complementarity of technologies and the demand for digital skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Tongxia Zhang & Waseem Alam, 2023. "Utilizing Fuzzy AHP in the Evaluation of Barriers to Blockchain Implementation in Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Lavaei Adaryani, Rasool & Palouj, Mojtaba & Karbasioun, Mostafa & Asadi, Ali & Gholami, Hesamedin & Kianirad, Ali & Joodi Damirchi, Milad, 2024. "Antecedents of blockchain adoption in the poultry supply chain: An extended UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Jha, Saumitra, 2014. "‘Unfinished business’: Historic complementarities, political competition and ethnic violence in Gujarat," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 18-36.
    19. Ennen, Edgar & Richter, Ansgar, 2009. "The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts - Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations," MPRA Paper 15666, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Jonathan Jan Pieters & Alinda Kokkinou & Ton Kollenburg, 2022. "Understanding Blockchain Technology Adoption by Non-experts: an Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:8-:d:1309220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.