IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i1p26-d745088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksander Aristovnik

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Eva Murko

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Dejan Ravšelj

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Public administration and public governance play a crucial role in society today by ensuring that social needs are met. Due to the constantly changing environment, public governance models have transformed many times, creating differences in public governance practices among public administration institutions, with combinations of contradictory structures and principles that coexist. Accordingly, this paper aims to provide an overview of different public governance models, extract quantifiable elements based on models’ principles and examine the extent of layering of different governance models at different levels of public administration in the specific case of the Slovenian administration. Thus, the main focus is on identifying the differences in characteristics of public governance practices between state administration and local self-government. The results show state administration institutions are more strongly characterised by the Neo-Weberian model’s principles. In contrast, local self-government institutions are more oriented to managerial public governance and Digital-Era Governance practices. Public managers may regard the results as additional resources for democratic and efficient governing. At the same time, they may provide policymakers with in-depth insights to consider while determining the trajectories of future public administration reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksander Aristovnik & Eva Murko & Dejan Ravšelj, 2022. "From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:26-:d:745088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wonhyuk Cho & Winda Dwi Melisa, 2021. "Citizen Coproduction and Social Media Communication: Delivering a Municipal Government’s Urban Services through Digital Participation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    3. Baseer Ahmad Baheer & David Lamas & Sónia Sousa, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, April.
    4. Kovač Polonca, 2014. "Better Local Governance by Integrative Reorganization of State Administration and Self- Government (in Slovenia)," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 117-134, December.
    5. Benčina Jože & Kozjek Tatjana & Rakar Iztok, 2021. "Assessment of the Quality of Governance and Competitiveness at the Local Level: The Case of Slovenian Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 9-35, June.
    6. Polonca KovaÄ & Nina TomaževiÄ & Anamarija Leben & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2016. "Reforming public administration in Slovenia: between theory and practice of good governance and good administration," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3/4/5/6), pages 130-148.
    7. Nicola Mario Iacovino & Sara Barsanti & Lino Cinquini, 2017. "Public Organizations Between Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: the Case of the Tuscany Region," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-82, March.
    8. Jacob Torfing & Peter Triantafillou, 2013. "What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 9-25, August.
    9. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Inger Johanne Pettersen, 2001. "Implementing management accounting reforms in the public sector: the difficult journey from intentions to effects," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 561-581.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. László Buics & Zsolt Csaba Horváth & Péter Földesi & Boglárka Balassa Eisinger, 2024. "An assessment of traffic education and its examination system—an extended House of Quality approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2014. "La relazione tra il livello di coinvolgimento nel processo di budget, il commitment verso gli obiettivi, la soddisfazione lavorativa e i relativi risvolti sulla performance manageriale. I risultati di," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 9-34.
    2. Edgar Quispe-Mamani & Pascual Ayamamani-Collanqui, 2023. "Unitarian Illusion in Peru: Recentralization and Intergovernmental Conflicts from the Perspective of Local Governments," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 985-1000, September.
    3. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    4. Wonhyuk Cho & Seeyoung Choi & Hemin Choi, 2023. "Human Resources Analytics for Public Personnel Management: Concepts, Cases, and Caveats," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Monia Castellini & Caterina Ferrario & Vincenzo Riso, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Risk Management: An overview of Italian municipalities," Working Papers 20210310, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    6. Maia Maziashvili & Izabela Kowalik, 2022. "City citizenship behavior and participation in promotion," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 113-127, June.
    7. Christophe Maurel, 2006. "Étude d’un changement organisationnel dans de grandes collectivités territoriales:l’évolution de la fonction contrôle de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 9(3), pages 105-134, September.
    8. Christodoulos K. Akrivos, 2019. "Managers’ Perception on Public Organizations’ Performance and New Public Management during Economic Crises," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 57-69.
    9. Bernhard Hirsch & Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer & Aleksander Aristovnik & Polonca Kovač & Dejan Ravšelj, 2023. "The impact of Digitalized Communication on the effectiveness of Local Administrative Authorities – Findings from Central European Countries in the COVID-19 Crisis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 173-192, January.
    10. Tudor C. ?ICL?U, 2019. "Public Managemt Reform. A Critique Of The Romanian Case," TAD 14 The disciplines and the study of Public Administration: Transatlantic perspectives in the margin of the 14th Administration and Public Management International Conference, Bucharest, June 6-18 8, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania.
    11. Macinati, Manuela S. & Rizzo, Marco G., 2014. "Budget goal commitment, clinical managers’ use of budget information and performance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 228-238.
    12. Stamatiadis, Filippos & Eriotis, Nikolaos, 2011. "Evolution of the Governmental Accounting Reform implementation in Greek Public Hospitals: Testing the institutional framework," MPRA Paper 28816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Luis Rubalcaba & Kirsty Strokosch & Anne Vorre Hansen & Maria Røhnebæk & Christine Liefooghe, 2022. "Insights on Value Co-Creation, Living Labs and Innovation in the Public Sector," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, March.
    14. Tudor Cristian Ticlau, 2014. "Contemporary Business Education: a Solution for Global Leadership Challenges," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 885-885, August.
    15. Ropret Marko & Aristovnik Aleksander & Kovač Polonca, 2018. "A Content Analysis of the Rule of Law within Public Governance Models: Old vs. New EU Member States," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 129-152, December.
    16. Abdullah Zafar Sheikh & John Chandler & Basharat Hussain & Stephen Timmons, 2022. "Performance measurement and management in the British higher education sector," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4809-4824, December.
    17. Erika K. Gubrium & Ariana Fernandes Guilherme, 2014. "Policing Norwegian Welfare: Disciplining and Differentiating within the Bottom Rungs," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 005-017.
    18. Xiaoqin Guo & Xiang Li, 2022. "A Study on Community Public Safety Collaborative Governance Regime in the Background of COVID-19: Empirical Analysis Based on China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Kovač Polonca, 2016. "Openness and Transparency in (Slovene) Administrative Procedures as Fundamental European Principles," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 49-67, December.
    20. Mercier, Jean & Carrier, Mario & Duarte, Fábio & Tremblay-Racicot, Fanny, 2016. "Policy tools for sustainable transport in three cities of the Americas: Seattle, Montreal and Curitiba," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 95-105.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:26-:d:745088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.