IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v12y2016i3-4-5-6p130-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming public administration in Slovenia: between theory and practice of good governance and good administration

Author

Listed:
  • Polonca KovaÄ
  • Nina TomaževiÄ
  • Anamarija Leben
  • Aleksander Aristovnik

Abstract

Good administration has evolved in administrative theory and practice differently but within the concept of good governance, incorporating efficient and democratic authority with simultaneous implementation of public interest and guaranteed rights of defence to parties in administrative matters. In view of the above, a theoretical analysis of good administration in relation to good governance was conducted in 2015, with special research on the Slovene practices in various types of administrative agencies. Findings of the analysis based on views of heads of administrative units and regional financial and police offices, compared to statistical data, prove that Slovene administration consider good administration more as a compliance to formal requirements instead of proactive support of a party and public benefit. Hence, policy makers should consider in future public administration reforms the fact that value-based rather than purely structural and normative changes are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Polonca KovaÄ & Nina TomaževiÄ & Anamarija Leben & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2016. "Reforming public administration in Slovenia: between theory and practice of good governance and good administration," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3/4/5/6), pages 130-148.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:12:y:2016:i:3/4/5/6:p:130-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79732
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksander Aristovnik & Eva Murko & Dejan Ravšelj, 2022. "From Neo-Weberian to Hybrid Governance Models in Public Administration: Differences between State and Local Self-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Khleef A. Alkhawaldeh, 2021. "Institutional Governance Practices in Jordan Government Units," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 52-65.
    3. Schorn, Michael & Kaesmayr, Julia & Steidle, Anna, 2023. "Measuring Good Administration," OSF Preprints 9dt5c, Center for Open Science.
    4. Bernhard Hirsch & Fabienne-Sophie Schäfer & Aleksander Aristovnik & Polonca Kovač & Dejan Ravšelj, 2023. "The impact of Digitalized Communication on the effectiveness of Local Administrative Authorities – Findings from Central European Countries in the COVID-19 Crisis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 173-192, January.
    5. Kovač Polonca, 2016. "Openness and Transparency in (Slovene) Administrative Procedures as Fundamental European Principles," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 49-67, December.
    6. Ropret Marko & Aristovnik Aleksander & Kovač Polonca, 2018. "A Content Analysis of the Rule of Law within Public Governance Models: Old vs. New EU Member States," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 129-152, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:12:y:2016:i:3/4/5/6:p:130-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.