IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024ispecialbp289-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remote Work Efficiency and Work Satisfaction Among Specialists

Author

Listed:
  • Krystyna Khorrami
  • Jacek Dziwulski
  • Krystyna Wojciechowska

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the survey conducted on a group of 469 IT specialists of Polish nationality, working in enterprises in Poland was to learn about the links between the effectiveness of remote work and job satisfaction. Design/Methodology/Approach: Taking into account human capital management approach the main research methods which were used in the study were literature review, diagnostic survey research and basic statistical analysis. The study was conducted on the basis of a survey questionnaire, using the translational method - the classic survey questionnaire technique was digitized and transferred to the Internet. The research results were presented in cross-sectional approaches, which include specifics by gender, age, total work experience, income level, and work organization factors like type of employment contract, position held, place of work, size of the enterprise, location, type of capital, influence the effectiveness and satisfaction of remote work. Findings: The results obtained indicated a positive correlation between the effectiveness of IT specialists' remote work and their job satisfaction. Practical Implications: Most IT professionals perform their work remotely, usually working on two - four projects at the same time. The effectiveness of their work depends both on their personal adaptation to the requirements of individual projects, on the computer hardware and software, and on the constant updating of their knowledge, due to the high dynamics of development of the IT industry. Originality/Value: Job satisfaction depends on needs of IT specialists satisfied by the hardware and software they work on, as well as on the quality of communication with their superiors.

Suggested Citation

  • Krystyna Khorrami & Jacek Dziwulski & Krystyna Wojciechowska, 2024. "Remote Work Efficiency and Work Satisfaction Among Specialists," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 289-306.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:289-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3490/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:mfppss:03074350410769137 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. James G. March & Robert I. Sutton, 1997. "Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(6), pages 698-706, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bat Batjargal, 2000. "Entrepreneurial Versatility, Resources and Firm Performance in Russia: A Panel Study," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 351, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    2. Saeedeh Ahmadi & Saeed Khanagha & Luca Berchicci & Justin J. P. Jansen, 2017. "Are Managers Motivated to Explore in the Face of a New Technological Change? The Role of Regulatory Focus, Fit, and Complexity of Decision‐Making," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 209-237, March.
    3. Misbah Haque & Imran Ali, 2016. "Uncertain Environment and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 124-124, September.
    4. Holwerda, Jacob A., 2021. "Big data? Big deal: Searching for big data’s performance effects in HR," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 391-399.
    5. Chiara Oppi & Cristina Campanale & Lino Cinquini, 2021. "Il problema dell?ambiguit? nei sistemi di misurazione della performance nel settore pubblico: un?analisi della letteratura internazionale," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 11-38.
    6. Vishal K. Gupta & Gizem Atav & Dev K. Dutta, 2019. "Market orientation research: a qualitative synthesis and future research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 649-670, August.
    7. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Reverte, Carmelo & Gómez-Melero, Eduardo & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2016. "Linking social and economic responsibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 530-539.
    8. Oleg V. Petrenko & Federico Aime & Tessa Recendes & Jeffrey A. Chandler, 2019. "The case for humble expectations: CEO humility and market performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 1938-1964, December.
    9. Shige Makino & Christine M. Chan, 2017. "Skew and heavy-tail effects on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1721-1740, August.
    10. Raake, Anke & Gleich, Ronald & Wald, Andreas, 2008. "Anwendungsstand und Erfolgsfaktoren von Kennzahlen- und Performance Measurement-Systemen in öffentlichen Unternehmen – Ergebnisse einer Studie im Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(4), pages 408-426.
    11. Matthew J. Robson & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Daniel C. Bello, 2008. "Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 647-665, August.
    12. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    13. Carmen Lages & Luis Filipe Lages & Paulo Rita, 2004. "The relationship between e-marketing strategy and performance: a conceptual framework in a web context," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp446, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    14. Meglio, Olimpia & Risberg, Annette, 2011. "The (mis)measurement of M&A performance—A systematic narrative literature review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 418-433.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:342-350 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Allam Yousuf & Hossam Haddad & Miklos Pakurar & Serhii Kozlovskyi & Anastasiia Mohylova & Oksana Shlapak & Felfoldi Janos, 2019. "The Effect of Operational Flexibility on Performance: A Field Study on Small and Medium-sized Industrial Companies in Jordan," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(1), pages 47-60.
    17. Rose N. Mkalama & Vincent N. Machuki, 2019. "Top Management Demographics and Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Kenyan State Corporations," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Fabio R. Chaddad & Mario P. Mondelli, 2013. "Sources of Firm Performance Differences in the US Food Economy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 382-404, June.
    19. Etienne Minvielle & Claude Sicotte & François Champagne & André-Pierre Contandriopoulos & Marine Jeantet & Nathalie Préaubert & Annie Bourdil & Christian Richard, 2008. "Hospital performance: Competing or shared values?," Post-Print hal-03477095, HAL.
    20. Paul D. Ellis, 2010. "Is Market Orientation Affected by the Size and Diversity of Customer Networks?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 325-345, June.
    21. Alfonso Expósito & Juan A. Sanchis-Llopis, 2018. "Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: new evidence from a multi-dimensional approach," Working Papers 1805, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Remote work; efficiency; work satisfaction; IT.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:specialb:p:289-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.