IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p1242-1250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Perspectives on Sharenting: Attitudes, Privacy Concerns, and Children's Digital Footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Gotwald
  • Bogdan Gregod
  • Marlena Kowalczyk

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the present investigation is to elucidate parental perspectives regarding sharenting, with a particular emphasis on their attitudes, concerns pertaining to privacy, and the ramifications of children's digital footprints. As the phenomenon of sharenting proliferates on a global scale, it is imperative to comprehend the underlying motivations and associated risks pertinent to this trend in order to effectively address its ethical, social, and economic ramifications. Design/Methodology/Approach: This investigation adopted a survey-based approach, concentrating on a sample of 326 parents of children aged 15 years or younger. The data collection instrument consisted of Likert-scale, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions, addressing themes such as parental attitudes towards sharenting, privacy and safety concerns, emotional reactions, and social media behaviors. The statistical analyses utilized included Spearman’s Correlation, Chi-Square Tests, Cramer’s V, in addition to descriptive statistics. Findings: The results indicate a diverse spectrum of parental perspectives on sharenting, with 60% of respondents perceiving it as beneficial. Privacy-related apprehensions were notably pronounced, with 75% of parents expressing varying levels of concern. Frequent social media users demonstrated a slightly greater propensity to acknowledge the advantages associated with sharenting (Spearman’s ρ = 0.06, p = 0.296), whereas parents affected by child influencers exhibited a considerable tendency to share their children's content (Point-Biserial r = 0.01, p = 0.896). However, no substantial correlations were identified between parental privacy apprehensions and the age of the children or anticipated future implications for privacy. Emotional responses, such as pleasure or unease, did not significantly impact attitudes towards the perceived benefits of sharenting. Practical Implications: The study highlights the urgent need for developing policies that promote parental digital literacy to mitigate the privacy risks associated with sharenting. Moreover, the insights obtained regarding influencer-related behaviors present relevant implications for marketing strategies targeting the parental sector. The findings emphasize the necessity of balancing the benefits of social media participation with the long-term effects on children's digital identities. Originality/Value: This research enhances the growing body of literature on sharenting by examining a broad range of interconnected factors, including privacy concerns, influencer impact, and emotional responses. It lays the groundwork for interdisciplinary research that spans marketing, digital ethics, and educational studies while proposing pathways for international collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Gotwald & Bogdan Gregod & Marlena Kowalczyk, 2024. "Parental Perspectives on Sharenting: Attitudes, Privacy Concerns, and Children's Digital Footprint," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1242-1250.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1242-1250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3833/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sharenting; influencer marketing; children; digital footprint; children’s privacy.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1242-1250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.