IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial2p681-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Employees’ Competencies: A Comparison between Educational and Business Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Gasior
  • Lukasz Skowron
  • Monika Sak-Skowron

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the presented research is to evaluate whether employers’ expectations and needs related to the competencies of potential employees are properly identified by educational institutions do institutions responsible for education and training know which competencies are considered significant by business, and if they do not what are the areas of potential discrepancies? Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was based on comparison between opinions of managers of companies operating in eastern Poland (381 cases), and representatives of educational institutions, universities, vocational, technical and secondary schools located in this area (389 cases). For each group, self reporting questionnaire was designed, in which participants were asked to evaluate the importance of 39 competencies from four groups: social, personal, managerial and professional. Obtained values were analysed and compared between groups using Man-Whitney’s U test. Findings: During the research the hierarchies of the importance of employee competencies were established. In the opinion of managers, the most important are four personal competencies, i.e., scrupulousness, professional and work development, time management and kindness, least important, whole group of managerial competencies, but also IT skills, process management and foreign languages. The representatives of educational institutions assume that the most important is a whole set of interpersonal skills, least, those grouped in ‘managerial’ category. Additionally, the gap in the perception of those competencies by both groups was identified. The main differences include (1) slight overestimation of the importance of all competencies by teachers and (2) significant overestimation of the importance of most of the personal and professional competencies. Practical Implications: There are two categories of practical implications resulting from the research. First of all, it provides information for employees on expectations of potential employers, and therefore makes it possible to gain advantage on a labour market. Secondly, it may be considered as a clear roadmap for educational institutions, defining the areas of teaching processes which should be modified in order to make them more adjusted to local companies’ needs and their structure of expectations. Originality/Value: In existing research related to employee competencies there was no attempt of comparison of two groups, one responsible for development, second interested in accessing those competencies and of the identification of the gap in the perception of competencies’ importance between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Gasior & Lukasz Skowron & Monika Sak-Skowron, 2021. "The Importance of Employees’ Competencies: A Comparison between Educational and Business Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 681-694.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2:p:681-694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2303/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torkkeli, Marko & Tuominen, Markku, 2002. "The contribution of technology selection to core competencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 271-284, June.
    2. ., 1994. "Microfoundations of Macroeconomic Competitiveness," Chapters, in: Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Warren J. Samuels & Marc R. Tool (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, volume 0, chapter 104, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    2. Ad van den Oord & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2018. "A multi-level model of emerging technology: An empirical study of the evolution of biotechnology from 1976 to 2003," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Rafael Lizarralde & Jaione Ganzarain & Mikel Zubizarreta, 2020. "Assessment and Selection of Technologies for the Sustainable Development of an R&D Center," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Nasrollahi, Sadaf & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Jahangir, Mohammad-Hossein & Aryaee, Sara, 2023. "Selecting suitable wave energy technology for sustainable development, an MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 756-772.
    5. Mujaheed Shaikh & Pietro Giudice & Dimitrios Kourouklis, 2021. "Revisiting the Relationship Between Price Regulation and Pharmaceutical R&D Investment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 217-229, March.
    6. Ghatak, Anita & Ghatak, Subrata, 1996. "Budgetary deficits and Ricardian equivalence: The case of India, 1950-1986," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 267-282, May.
    7. Aloini, Davide & Dulmin, Riccardo & Mininno, Valeria & Pellegrini, Luisa & Farina, Giulia, 2018. "Technology assessment with IF-TOPSIS: An application in the advanced underwater system sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 38-48.
    8. Erdogmus, Senol & Kapanoglu, Muzaffer & Koc, Eylem, 2005. "Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 391-399, November.
    9. William B. Edgar & Chris A. Lockwood, 2021. "Corporate Core Competencies’ Essence, Contexts, Discovery, and Future: A Call to Action for Executives and Researchers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1_suppl), pages 21582440211, December.
    10. Comi, Alice & Eppler, Martin J., 2014. "Diagnosing capabilities in family firms: An overview of visual research methods and suggestions for future applications," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 41-51.
    11. Hacklin, Fredrik & Marxt, Christian & Fahrni, Fritz, 2006. "Strategic venture partner selection for collaborative innovation in production systems: A decision support system-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 100-112, November.
    12. Dariusz Nowak, 2018. "The Core Competences Of Polish Industrial Enterprises," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 1 Year 20, pages 23-43.
    13. Ma, Daw & Chang, Chia-Chin & Hung, Shiu-Wan, 2013. "The selection of technology for late-starters: A case study of the energy-smart photovoltaic industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 10-20.
    14. Xiaoping Du & Lelai Deng, 2018. "Current Core Competencies Trend of Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in China—A Concurrent Comprehensive Evaluation and Active Learning Study of Newly Listed Chinese Stocks from 2015 through 2017," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Tan, Kim Hua & Noble, James & Sato, Yuji & Tse, Ying Kei, 2011. "A marginal analysis guided technology evaluation and selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 15-21, May.
    16. Ulengin, Fusun & Ulengin, Burc & Onsel, Sule, 2002. "A power-based measurement approach to specify macroeconomic competitiveness of countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 203-226, September.
    17. Andolfatto, David & Gomme, Paul, 1996. "Unemployment insurance and labor-market activity in Canada," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 47-82, June.
    18. Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Ortega Jimenez, Cesar H. & de los Ríos, José Luis Díez Pérez & Morita, Michiya, 2015. "Implementation of technology and production strategy practices: Relationship levels in different industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 201-216.
    19. Vítor Vasata Macchi Silva & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Gonzalo Rubén Alvarez & Sonia Elisa Caregnato, 2019. "Competence-Based Management Research in the Web of Science and Scopus Databases: Scientific Production, Collaboration, and Impact," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Jeremy G. Davis, 2004. "Capabilities: A Different Perspective," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(1), pages 39-43, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Employee competencies; education; perception gap.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special2:p:681-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.