IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v3y2018i3p26-d158363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Core Competencies Trend of Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in China—A Concurrent Comprehensive Evaluation and Active Learning Study of Newly Listed Chinese Stocks from 2015 through 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoping Du

    (School of Software, Beihang University, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District No. 37, Beijing 100191, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lelai Deng

    (School of Software, Beihang University, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District No. 37, Beijing 100191, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

With plenty of stocks newly listed in the Chinese stock market everyday, it becomes more and more important for managers and governess to examine the trend of core competencies for these companies. Since most companies of newly listed stocks are small to medium-sized enterprises, existing methods are not capable enough to evaluate their competitiveness. To provide an understanding for the trend of core competencies in the Chinese market, this article conducts a concurrent comprehensive evaluation and active learning methodology to analyze the newly listed stocks in SSE (Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index) and SZSE (Shenzhen Stock Exchange Component Index) from 2015 through 2017. There is an evidence that Number of Market Makers, Equity Financing Frequency and Executive Replacement Frequency are three main core competencies from 2015 through 2017. Authors contend that their findings in this paper question the quo of core competencies for small to medium-sized enterprises in the Chinese market.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoping Du & Lelai Deng, 2018. "Current Core Competencies Trend of Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in China—A Concurrent Comprehensive Evaluation and Active Learning Study of Newly Listed Chinese Stocks from 2015 through 2017," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:26-:d:158363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/3/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/3/3/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torkkeli, Marko & Tuominen, Markku, 2002. "The contribution of technology selection to core competencies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 271-284, June.
    2. Lim, Sungmook & Oh, Kwang Wuk & Zhu, Joe, 2014. "Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection: An application to Korean stock market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 361-368.
    3. Joe Zhu, 2014. "DEA Cross Efficiency," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, edition 3, chapter 4, pages 61-92, Springer.
    4. E. R. Osagie & R. Wesselink & V. Blok & T. Lans & M. Mulder, 2016. "Individual Competencies for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature and Practice Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 233-252, May.
    5. Kong‐Jun Chen & Xiao‐Ming Li, 2006. "Is Technical Analysis Useful For Stock Traders In China? Evidence From The Szse Component A‐Share Index," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 477-488, December.
    6. H. R. Seddighi & W. Nian, 2004. "The Chinese stock exchange market: operations and efficiency," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(11), pages 785-797.
    7. Wei Shi & Brian L. Connelly & Robert E. Hoskisson, 2017. "External corporate governance and financial fraud: cognitive evaluation theory insights on agency theory prescriptions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1268-1286, June.
    8. Hedayati , Amin & Hedayati , Moein & Esfandyari, Morteza, 2016. "Stock market index prediction using artificial neural network," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 21(41), pages 89-93.
    9. Govindan, Kannan & Kaliyan, Mathiyazhagan & Kannan, Devika & Haq, A.N., 2014. "Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 555-568.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinar, Mehmet & Stengos, Thanasis & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "On the construction of a feasible range of multidimensional poverty under benchmark weight uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 415-427.
    2. Hsiao-Yen Mao & Wen-Min Lu & Hsin-Yen Shieh, 2023. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Investment on Multinational Enterprises’ Performance from the Sustainability and Marketability Efficiency Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Liesiö, Juuso & Andelmin, Juho & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Efficient allocation of resources to a portfolio of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 619-636.
    4. Maciel, Leandro, 2021. "A new approach to portfolio management in the Brazilian equity market: Does assets efficiency level improve performance?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 38-56.
    5. Tsakiridis, Andreas & Mateo-Mantecón, Ingrid & O'Connor, Eamonn & Hynes, Stephen & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2021. "Efficiency benchmarking of Irish and North Atlantic Spanish ports: Implications for blue growth," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Kairui Zuo & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 175-194, July.
    7. Hashem Omrani & Khatereh Shafaat & Arash Alizadeh, 2019. "Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 471-499, March.
    8. Akhilesh KUMAR & Mohammad SHAHID, 2021. "Portfolio selection problem: Issues, challenges and future prospectus," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(4(629), W), pages 71-90, Winter.
    9. Mohammed Al-Siyabi & Gholam R. Amin & Shekar Bose & Hussein Al-Masroori, 2019. "Peer-judgment risk minimization using DEA cross-evaluation with an application in fishery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 39-55, March.
    10. Nuno Ferreira & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2015. "Efficiency in Stock Markets with DEA: Evidence from PSI20," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 5(1), pages 861-861.
    11. Oukil, Amar, 2020. "Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Wencheng Yu & Shaobo Liu & Lili Ding, 2021. "Efficiency Evaluation and Selection Strategies for Green Portfolios under Different Risk Appetites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Wu, Jie & Chu, Junfei & Sun, Jiasen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 571-579.
    14. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2019. "Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 364-375.
    15. Jie Wu & Junfei Chu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Liang Liang, 2016. "DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology selection," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 5990-6007, October.
    16. Wenli Liu & Ying-Ming Wang & Shulong Lv, 2017. "An aggressive game cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 241-258, December.
    17. David Vidal-Tomás & Ana M. Ibáñez & José E. Farinós, 2021. "The Effect of the Launch of Bitcoin Futures on the Cryptocurrency Market: An Economic Efficiency Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Qin, Jindong & Zhou, Ligang & Mardani, Abbas & Deveci, Muhammet, 2022. "An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Yangxue Ning & Yan Zhang & Guoqiang Wang, 2023. "An Improved DEA Prospect Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method and Its Application in Fund Performance Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:26-:d:158363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.