IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3p763-773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Consequences of Student’s Views on Cultural Heritage Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Wanda Musialik
  • Krzysztof Malik
  • Piotr Bebenek
  • Krzysztof Kowalik

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the research was to anticipate the choices declared by current students in order-to evaluate the significance of these choices in formulating regional de-velopment policies and programs. Design/Methodology/Approach: The cultural heritage value was analyzed from the re-spondents' awareness of their individual needs. The question then arises as if and to what extent students of non-humanistic faculties are aware of the personal benefits gained from utilizing cultural heritage components and how they define the needs satisfied by these manifestations. The survey aimed to examine to what extent the issues of cultural heritage goods utilization were considered in terms of the interests of the modern generation of technical university students. Findings: It was determined to what extent the perception of cultural heritage goods among graduates-to-be of non-human studies is driven by economic thinking. Practical Implications: To be used by government officials to promote cultural heritage. Originality/Value: Since current students' social and economic choices will affect the fu-ture economy, their views should be taken into-account when designing and implementing regional development policies and programs that involve cultural heritage sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanda Musialik & Krzysztof Malik & Piotr Bebenek & Krzysztof Kowalik, 2021. "Economic Consequences of Student’s Views on Cultural Heritage Goods," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 763-773.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:763-773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2383/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holcombe, Randall G. (Холкомб, Рэндалл Дж.), 2015. "A Theory of the Theory of Public Goods [Теория Происхождения Теории Общественных Благ]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 196-207.
    2. Sabina Kubiciel-Lodzińska & Jolanta Maj, 2021. "High-Skilled vs. Low-Skilled Migrant Women: the Use of Competencies and Knowledge—Theoretical and Political Implications: an Example of the Elderly Care Sector in Poland," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1551-1571, December.
    3. Wanda Musialik & Krzysztof Malik, 2020. "The Analysis of Cultural Heritage Assets as a Potential for Local Development: Study of the Academic Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 172-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gage Counts & Walter E Block, 2016. "Fracking: A creature of government?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 27(8), pages 933-941, December.
    2. Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro & Cláudio Djissey Shikida, 2000. "Existe trade-off entre receitas próprias e transferências? O caso dos municípios mineiros," Anais do IX Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira [Proceedings of the 9th Seminar on the Economy of Minas Gerais], in: João Antonio de Paula & et alli (ed.),Anais do IX Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira, volume 1, pages 441-462, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    3. Faruk ÜLGEN, 2018. "Financial stability as a global public good and relevant systemic regulation as a problem of collective action," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 95-112, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    4. Costică MIHAI & Mariana HATMANU, 2018. "Particular Aspects Of Consumer Profile Of The Public Goods Generated In A Region With Extensive Agricultural Activities: The Case Of Dorna Valley Area Of Romania," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 272-288.
    5. Arturs Kokars, 2023. "Strategic Development of Aviation in Latvia ," GATR Journals jber240, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    6. Walter E. Block, 2014. "Justifying a Stateless Legal Order: A Critique of Rand and Epstein," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 29(Spring 20), pages 21-49.
    7. Joseph Michael Newhard, 2016. "An Interest Group Theory of Public Goods Provision: Reassessing the Relative Efficiency of the Market and the State," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 31(Winter 20), pages 21-41.
    8. Hongpeng Fu & Lingbo Fu & Lóránt Dénes Dávid & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu, 2024. "Bridging Gaps towards the 2030 Agenda: A Data-Driven Comparative Analysis of Government and Public Engagement in China towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Fabiola Ortega-de-Mora & Teresa Terrón-Caro, 2023. "Access to Labor Market and Integration of Moroccan Women in Andalusia: The Two Sides of the Coin," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Walter Block & Ivan Jankovic, 2016. "Tragedy of the Partnership: A Critique of Elinor Ostrom," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 289-318, March.
    11. Zhiwen Su & Mingyu Zhang & Jianjun Sun & Wenbing Wu, 2023. "Agribusiness diversification and technological innovation efficiency: A U‐shaped relationship," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 322-346, March.
    12. Zoltán Cséfalvay, 2011. "Searching for Economic Rationale behind Gated Communities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 749-764, March.
    13. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "International policy entrepreneurship and production of international public goods: the case of multilateral trade regime," MPRA Paper 80819, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Justyna Ewa Proniewicz, 2023. "Is the Tendency to Free Ride Impacting Your Willingness to Pay for Public Healthcare?," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 15(2), pages 131-155, June.
    15. Polcyn, Jan, 2017. "Edukacja jako dobro publiczne - próba kwantyfikacji [Education as a public good – an attempt at quantification]," MPRA Paper 76606, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    16. Sadowy Katarzyna & Brodowicz Dominika P., 2021. "New Craft Production in Europe - between Creative Class and Industrial Manufacturing," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 896-920.
    17. Wenli Cheng & Dingsheng Zhang, 2011. "How Should A Public Good Be Provided? A Transaction Cost Approach," Division of Labor & Transaction Costs (DLTC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 69-80.
    18. Artavia-Mora, L.D., 2016. "Intuitive cooperation in The Hague : A natural field experiment," ISS Working Papers - General Series 614, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    19. Hu, Xiaowei & Li, Peng, 2022. "Relief and stimulus in a cross-sector multi-product scarce resource supply chain network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Kowalska Aleksandra & Budzyńska Anna & Białowąs Tomasz, 2022. "Food export restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Real and potential effects on food security," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(4), pages 409-424, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cultural heritage goods; economic and social choices; development policies and programmes.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:763-773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.