IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i3p1153-1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Integral Model of Critical Infrastructure Safety in Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Wisniewski

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to create a dedicated tool for managing the level of availability of services delivered by critical infrastructure (CI) facilities, which will affect the Sustainable Development Goals. The paper established a link between sustainability, Industry 4.0, and critical infrastructure. The literature analysis has indicated that the security of Industry 4.0 is discussed almost exclusively in the perspective of cyber security. Design/Methodology/Approach: Verification of the tool was carried out based on simulations and computational experience using data PKN ORLEN Refinery Inc. Findings: As a result of the work carried out, an Integral Model of Critical Infrastructure Safety (IMCIS) was obtained, which allows us to present CI's current characteristics. It was established that the canon of characterization of CI objects consists of a set of resources, a set of functionalities, a set of threats, a set of safeguards, a set of threat dependencies, and a set of dependencies of objects recognized as CI. Practical Implications: A universal application of the IMCIS is to estimate the level of risk before and after implementing safeguards and generating adverse event scenarios. The identified threats are the decision-making areas of the decision problem, whose solution is indicated by a set of safeguards reducing the risk level to an acceptable level. Originality/Value: The solution can be used to identify a set of safeguards that, on the one hand, will reduce the cost of the business operator to a minimum and, on the other hand, achieve the required level of availability of CI functionality. In addition, IMCIS allows analyzing all threats that may affect the infrastructure of Industry 4.0, taking into account many independent decision-making centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Wisniewski, 2021. "The Role of Integral Model of Critical Infrastructure Safety in Industry 4.0," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1153-1188.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:1153-1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2410/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bloomfield, Robin E. & Popov, Peter & Salako, Kizito & Stankovic, Vladimir & Wright, David, 2017. "Preliminary interdependency analysis: An approach to support critical-infrastructure risk-assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 198-217.
    2. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Alexander Fekete & Peter Lauwe & Wolfram Geier, 2012. "Risk management goals and identification of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 336-353.
    4. Michał Młody & Adam Weinert, 2020. "Industry 4.0 in Poland: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Iwona Staniec (ed.), Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0, chapter 0, pages 43-71, Springer.
    5. Li Da Xu, 2020. "The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 618-631, July.
    6. Utne, I.B. & Hokstad, P. & Vatn, J., 2011. "A method for risk modeling of interdependencies in critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 671-678.
    7. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2020. "Barriers of Creating Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0: Conclusions from International Experience," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Iwona Staniec (ed.), Contemporary Challenges in Cooperation and Coopetition in the Age of Industry 4.0, chapter 0, pages 3-42, Springer.
    8. Rehak, David & Markuci, Jiri & Hromada, Martin & Barcova, Karla, 2016. "Quantitative evaluation of the synergistic effects of failures in a critical infrastructure system," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 3-17.
    9. Maurizio Sajeva & Marcelo Masera, 2006. "A strategic approach to risk governance of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 379-395.
    10. Sven-Vegard Buer & Jan Ola Strandhagen & Felix T. S. Chan, 2018. "The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 2924-2940, April.
    11. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    12. Reiman, Arto & Kaivo-oja, Jari & Parviainen, Elina & Takala, Esa-Pekka & Lauraeus, Theresa, 2021. "Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context – A scoping review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Arvidsson, Björn & Johansson, Jonas & Guldåker, Nicklas, 2021. "Critical infrastructure, geographical information science and risk governance: A systematic cross-field review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Christoph Riegel, 2015. "Spatial criticality - identifying CIP hot-spots for German regional planning," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 265-277.
    15. Alcaraz, Cristina & Zeadally, Sherali, 2015. "Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 53-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arvidsson, Björn & Johansson, Jonas & Guldåker, Nicklas, 2021. "Critical infrastructure, geographical information science and risk governance: A systematic cross-field review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Rehak, David & Senovsky, Pavel & Hromada, Martin & Lovecek, Tomas & Novotny, Petr, 2018. "Cascading Impact Assessment in a Critical Infrastructure System," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 125-138.
    3. David Rehak & Michal Radimsky & Martin Hromada & Zdenek Dvorak, 2019. "Dynamic Impact Modeling as a Road Transport Crisis Management Support Tool," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, March.
    4. James, Ajith Tom & Kumar, Girish & Tayal, Pushpal & Chauhan, Ashwin & Wadhawa, Chirag & Panchal, Jasmin, 2022. "Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Moglen, Rachel L. & Barth, Julius & Gupta, Shagun & Kawai, Eiji & Klise, Katherine & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2023. "A nexus approach to infrastructure resilience planning under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Liu, Huan & Tatano, Hirokazu & Pflug, Georg & Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan, 2021. "Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2020. "A new soft computing approach for analyzing the influential relationships of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    8. Han, Lin & Zhao, Xudong & Chen, Zhilong & Gong, Huadong & Hou, Benwei, 2021. "Assessing resilience of urban lifeline networks to intentional attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    10. Edward J. Oughton & Daniel Ralph & Raghav Pant & Eireann Leverett & Jennifer Copic & Scott Thacker & Rabia Dada & Simon Ruffle & Michelle Tuveson & Jim W Hall, 2019. "Stochastic Counterfactual Risk Analysis for the Vulnerability Assessment of Cyber‐Physical Attacks on Electricity Distribution Infrastructure Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2012-2031, September.
    11. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    12. Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Jianhua & Yue, Xin, 2018. "Multiple robustness assessment method for understanding structural and functional characteristics of the power network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 261-270.
    13. Wang, Shuliang & Lv, Wenzhuo & Zhang, Jianhua & Luan, Shengyang & Chen, Chen & Gu, Xifeng, 2021. "Method of power network critical nodes identification and robustness enhancement based on a cooperative framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Å arÅ«nienÄ—, Inga & MartiÅ¡auskas, Linas & KrikÅ¡tolaitis, RiÄ ardas & Augutis, Juozas & Setola, Roberto, 2024. "Risk assessment of critical infrastructures: A methodology based on criticality of infrastructure elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Katarzyna Rostek & Michał Wiśniewski & Witold Skomra, 2022. "Analysis and Evaluation of Business Continuity Measures Employed in Critical Infrastructure during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    17. Zhou, Shenghua & Yang, Yifan & Ng, S. Thomas & Xu, J. Frank & Li, Dezhi, 2020. "Integrating data-driven and physics-based approaches to characterize failures of interdependent infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    18. Hong, Liu & Yan, Yongze & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2017. "Vulnerability effects of passengers' intermodal transfer distance preference and subway expansion on complementary urban public transportation systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 58-72.
    19. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    20. Wang, Shuliang & Stanley, H. Eugene & Gao, Yachun, 2018. "A methodological framework for vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems under deliberate attacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 21-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:1153-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.