IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxixy2016i3bp39-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Control of Agrarian field of Economics in the Conditions of Global Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • T.M. Polushkina
  • S.A. Kochetkova
  • Yu.A. Akimova
  • N.A. Polushkin

Abstract

Political, economic and social importance of agrarian problems in the Russian Federation has received extremely sharp sound associated with ensuring food security, import substitution of food which requires reasonable macroeconomic and financial government management, including the adaptation of modern measures of government regulation of rural development to the new economic conditions. In this regard, the economic science once again faces with the task of understanding and studying of the theoretical positions and methodological approaches to the development of a new agricultural policy, to the search of optimal forms and methods of government influence on the agricultural market, building a system of cooperation between government, business and the peasantry on the basis of maximal coordination of mechanisms of government regulation of the agrarian sector with the motivational structure of the rural population in terms of adaptation to modern agricultural methods and tools of influence. This article contains the argumentation of the provisions on the development of the system of government regulation of the agrarian sector of the Russian economy in the new economic conditions that will ensure import substitution, increase in the competitiveness of Russia in the global food market.

Suggested Citation

  • T.M. Polushkina & S.A. Kochetkova & Yu.A. Akimova & N.A. Polushkin, 2016. "Government Control of Agrarian field of Economics in the Conditions of Global Challenge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 39-55.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:3b:p:39-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/16_3_B_p3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Mahul & Charles J. Stutley, 2010. "Government Support to Agricultural Insurance : Challenges and Options for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2432.
    2. Dawn D. Thilmany & Christopher B. Barrett, 1997. "Regulatory Barriers in an Integrating World Food Market," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 91-107.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sviatoslav Kniaz & Nazar Podolchak & Yurii Dziurakh & Veronika Karkovska & Anatolii Kucher, 2023. "Development of Government Regulation on Investment Activities in Agriculture of Ukraine," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 136-150.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unnevehr, Laurian J., 2000. "Food safety issues and fresh food product exports from LDCs," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 231-240, September.
    2. Bo Xiong & John Beghin, 2017. "Disentangling Demand-Enhancing And Trade-Cost Effects Of Maximum Residue Regulations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 6, pages 105-108, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Calvin, Linda & Krissoff, Barry, 1998. "Technical Barriers To Trade: A Case Study Of Phytosanitary Barriers And U.S. - Japanese Apple Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Glauber, Joseph W., 2017. "Agricultural insurance and the WTO:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Yong Liu & A. Ford Ramsey, 2023. "Incorporating historical weather information in crop insurance rating," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 546-575, March.
    6. World Bank, 2011. "Enhancing Crop Insurance in India," World Bank Publications - Reports 2748, The World Bank Group.
    7. Wynn, Katherine & Spangenberg, German & Smith, Kevin & Wilson, William, 2017. "Valuing Genetically Modified Traits in Canola Using Real Options," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(2), May.
    8. World Bank, 2011. "Kazakhstan : Agricultural Insurance Feasibility Study, Volume 2. Annexes," World Bank Publications - Reports 20780, The World Bank Group.
    9. Bo Xiong & John C. Beghin, 2018. "TTIP and agricultural trade: The case of tariff elimination and pesticide policy cooperation," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 495-508, June.
    10. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.
    11. A Ford Ramsey, 2020. "Probability Distributions of Crop Yields: A Bayesian Spatial Quantile Regression Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 220-239, January.
    12. M. Mahdi Ghodsi, 2013. "Welfare Analysis of a Prohibitive NTM in a Society with a Proportion of Concerned Consumers," Working Papers 2013-12, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. Narrod, Clare A. & Malcolm, Scott A. & Kost, William E., 2000. "The Significance Of Interceptions Of Fresh Produce From Latin America And The Caribbean Into The United States," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21789, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Chi, Yichun & Zheng, Jiakun & Zhuang, Shengchao, 2022. "S-shaped narrow framing, skewness and the demand for insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 279-292.
    15. Visser, Martine & Jumare, Hafsah & Brick, Kerri, 2020. "Risk preferences and poverty traps in the uptake of credit and insurance amongst small-scale farmers in South Africa," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 826-836.
    16. Qizhong Yang & Keiichiro Honda & Tsunehiro Otsuki, 2019. "Structural demand estimation of the response to food safety regulations in the Japanese poultry market," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(3), pages 367-385, September.
    17. Petraud, Jean & Boucher, Stephen & Carter, Michael, 2015. "Competing theories of risk preferences and the demand for crop insurance: Experimental evidence from Peru," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211383, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. K.A. Naminova & N.T. Pavlova & M.P. Sarunova & D.V. Idzhilova, 2018. "Index Insurance as a Tool to Improve the Russian System of Insuring Risks of Agricultural Organizations with State Support," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 351-361.
    19. Mina, Christian D. & Reyes, Celia M. & Agbon, Adrian D. & Arboneda, Arkin, 2017. "Crop Insurance Program of the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation: Integrative Report from the Five Case Regions in the Philippines," Discussion Papers DP 2017-39, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    20. Shweta Sinha & Nitin K. Tripathi, 2016. "Assessing the Challenges in Successful Implementation and Adoption of Crop Insurance in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:3b:p:39-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.