IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijfirm/v12y2022i3p181-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Protection of Geographic Indications of Traditional Food “Tahu Kuning Kediri” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Niniek Wahyuni
  • Satriyani Cahyo Widayati

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the opportunity for the traditional food of Tahu Kuning Kediri (Kediri Yellow Tofu) as a product that deserves legal protection in the form of geographic indications, and to know the steps that must be taken so that the traditional food of ‘Tahu Kuning Kediri’ can get legal protection in the form of Geographical Indications. Approach/Methodology/Design: This research is a normative juridical study that emphasizes secondary data from literary studies, relevant research reports, and journals with the themes of traditional knowledge & local products (MSMEs). Sources of literature data, observations, results of interviews with related MSMEs organizations. Findings: Based on the description above, it can be concluded that the traditional food of ‘Tahu Kuning Kediri’ meets the requirements for legal protection in the form of a geographical indicator because it fulfills four conditions, namely a sign indicating its origin, GI objects in the form of goods and/or products, geographical factors and certain characteristics of goods and/or products that are different from other traditional regional yellow tofu food. Practical implications: The process of applying for legal protection in the form of geographic indications can be carried out by the association of MSMEs of ‘Tahu Kuning Kediri’ producers who are already legal in collaboration with the local government, and submit to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights by attaching the proposed Geographical Indication book. Originality/value: The research subjects are policies and regulations related to geographic indications.

Suggested Citation

  • Niniek Wahyuni & Satriyani Cahyo Widayati, 2022. "Legal Protection of Geographic Indications of Traditional Food “Tahu Kuning Kediri” Jawa Timur, Indonesia," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 12(3), pages 181-195.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:181-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalfirm.com/journal/330/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agostino, Mariarosaria & Trivieri, Francesco, 2014. "Geographical indication and wine exports. An empirical investigation considering the major European producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 22-36.
    2. Marie-Vivien, Delphine & Biénabe, Estelle, 2017. "The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martijn Huysmans & D. van Noord, 2021. "The market for lemons from Sorrento and Gouda from Holland. Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?: Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?," Working Papers 2108, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. N. Lalitha & Madhusudan Bandi & Soumya Vinayan, 2021. "Bhalia wheat in Gujarat: Does geographical indication registration have a role in arresting the decline?," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(1), pages 93-112, June.
    4. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    5. Mario Fernández-Zarza & Santiago Amaya-Corchuelo & Giovanni Belletti & Encarnación Aguilar-Criado, 2021. "Trust and Food Quality in the Valorisation of Geographical Indication Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Adelaide Baronchelli & Raul Caruso & Roberto Ricciuti, 2022. "Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons: Are embargoes effective?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 1336-1361, May.
    7. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Imre Fertő & Szilárd Podruzsik & Jeremiás Balogh, 2016. "Intra-industry trade in the wine sector in the enlarged European Union," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 159-172, November.
    9. Huysmans, Martijn, 2021. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU Geographical Indications Down Under," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314978, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Javier Martínez‐Falcó & Bartolomé Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez & Luis A. Millán‐Tudela, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 985-1006, October.
    11. Junko Kimura & Cyrille Rigolot, 2021. "The Potential of Geographical Indications (GI) to Enhance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Japan: Overview and Insights from Japan GI Mishima Potato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Maria Lisa Clodoveo & Ahmed Yangui & Mahdi Fendri & Simona Giordano & Pasquale Crupi & Filomena Corbo, 2021. "Protected Geographical Indications for EVOO in Tunisia: Towards Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Yuya Aikawa & Tomoko Hashino & Keijiro Otsuka, 2023. "Agglomeration with the Declining Marshallian Agglomeration Economies:An inquiry into the postwar development of the Nada sake brewing district in Japan," Discussion Papers 2308, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    14. Hüseyin Pamukçu & Ömer Saraç & Sercan Aytuğar & Mustafa Sandıkçı, 2021. "The Effects of Local Food and Local Products with Geographical Indication on the Development of Tourism Gastronomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Angela Cheptea & Marilyne Huchet, 2019. "Will a No‐deal Brexit Disturb the EU‐UK Agri‐food Trade?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 28-36, August.
    16. Liam Pippinato & Simone Blanc & Teresina Mancuso & Filippo Brun, 2020. "A Sustainable Niche Market: How Does Honey Behave?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    18. Tobias Chilla & Benedikt Fink & Richard Balling & Simon Reitmeier & Karola Schober, 2020. "The EU Food Label ‘Protected Geographical Indication’: Economic Implications and Their Spatial Dimension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Lingling Li & Yingzi Chen & Haoran Gao & Changjian Li, 2023. "How to Regulate the Infringements of Geographical Indications of Agricultural Products—An Empirical Study on Judicial Documents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-31, March.
    20. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geographical indication; ‘Tahu Kuning Kediri’; legal protection.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D0 - Microeconomics - - General
    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • K0 - Law and Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:181-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalfirm.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.