IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/erp/eiopxx/p0229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU governance and social services of general interest: When even the UK is concerned

Author

Listed:
  • Koukiadaki, Aristea

Abstract

The level of autonomy afforded to Member States to define certain services as ‘services of general interest’ and to shelter them from the market so as to promote social objectives has become in recent years a highly sensitive topic among EU and national policy actors and organisations. The increased activity in this area of the European Commission and the general absence of guidance on the conditions necessary to render such services of general interest by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) have resulted in uncertainty concerning the interaction of EU law with social services and more generally public services in the EU Member States. By focusing on the EU regulation on social services of general interest, the paper evaluates how the nature and provision of such services in the UK has been susceptible to changes as a result of the Services Directives, EU public procurement and competition law. The implementation of liberalisation plans in the UK well before any EU initiatives in this area meant that such services have been open to market forces well before other Member States. However, this has not led to the absence of concerns regarding the precise impact of EU law in this area. Recent policy initiatives by the Coalition government may expand further the degree of marketisation and increase the scope for interaction between EU and national-level regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Koukiadaki, Aristea, 2012. "EU governance and social services of general interest: When even the UK is concerned," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2012-005a.htm
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2012-005.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McMaster, Robert, 1995. "Competitive Tendering in UK Health and Local Authorities: What Happens to the Quality of Services?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 42(4), pages 409-427, November.
    2. Vincent-Jones, Peter, 2006. "The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199291274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Belisari & Daniele Binci & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Jason Coupet & Abagail McWilliams, 2017. "Integrating Organizational Economics and Resource Dependence Theory to Explain the Persistence of Quasi Markets," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Deborah Peel & Greg Lloyd & Alex Lord, 2007. "Business Improvement Districts and the Discourse of Contractualism," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 401-422, July.
    4. M.G. Lloyd, 2008. "Towards a ‘Pooled Sovereignty‘ in Community Planning in Scotland?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 58-68, February.
    5. Robin G. Milne & Robert E. Wright, 2004. "Competition and Costs: Evidence from Competitive Tendering in the Scottish National Health Service," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Diathesopoulos, Michael, 2010. "Relational contract theory and management contracts: A paradigm for the application of the Theory of the Norms," MPRA Paper 24028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Colin Scott & Ciara Brown, 2010. "Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance," Working Papers 201043, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    8. Roxana Gutiérrez-Romero & Dirk Haubrich & Iain McLean, 2008. "The Limits of Performance Assessments of Public Bodies: External Constraints in English Local Government," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(4), pages 767-787, August.
    9. Maria Goddard & Russell Mannion, 1998. "From competition to co‐operation: new economic relationships in the National Health Service," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(2), pages 105-119, March.
    10. Robin G. Milne, 1997. "Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 543-559, April.
    11. Aparajita Banerjee & Enda Murphy & Patrick Paul Walsh, 2020. "Perceptions of Multistakeholder Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Irish Non-State Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Leonie B Janssen-Jansen & Menno van der Veen, 2017. "Contracting communities: Conceptualizing Community Benefits Agreements to improve citizen involvement in urban development projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 205-225, January.
    13. Alexander Woestenburg & Erwin van der Krabben & Tejo Spit, 2019. "Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. S J Bailey & C Davidson, 1999. "The Purchaser—Provider Split: Theory and UK Evidence," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(2), pages 161-175, April.
    15. Martijn Hurk, 2016. "Learning to contract in public–private partnerships for road infrastructure: recent experiences in Belgium," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(3), pages 309-333, September.
    16. Nick Adnett, 1998. "The Acquired Rights Directive and Compulsory Competitive Tendering in the UK: An Economic Perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 69-81, July.
    17. Yu-Chen Lin & Chiang-Ming Chen, 2014. "Research Note: Service Quality and Market Structure in the International Tourist Hotel Industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 647-654, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eiopxx:p0229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Assistant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.