IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v42y1995i4p409-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Tendering in UK Health and Local Authorities: What Happens to the Quality of Services?

Author

Listed:
  • McMaster, Robert

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects on the quality of U.K. health and local authority services arising from the substitution of contract governance for direct provision. Empirical studies of contract provision tend to be confined to estimating cost savings. The paper assumes that transaction benefits as well production and transaction costs are pertinent to governance choice. Quality is assumed to be a benefit generated by health and local authorities. An ordered-probit model is presented and predicts that service quality is sensitive to governance adjustments; implying that the case for contracting services is not as clear cut as its advocates suggest. Copyright 1995 by Scottish Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • McMaster, Robert, 1995. "Competitive Tendering in UK Health and Local Authorities: What Happens to the Quality of Services?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 42(4), pages 409-427, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:42:y:1995:i:4:p:409-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nick Adnett, 1998. "The Acquired Rights Directive and Compulsory Competitive Tendering in the UK: An Economic Perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 69-81, July.
    2. Robin G. Milne, 1997. "Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 543-559, April.
    3. Maria Goddard & Russell Mannion, 1998. "From competition to co‐operation: new economic relationships in the National Health Service," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(2), pages 105-119, March.
    4. Yu-Chen Lin & Chiang-Ming Chen, 2014. "Research Note: Service Quality and Market Structure in the International Tourist Hotel Industry," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 647-654, June.
    5. Robin G. Milne & Robert E. Wright, 2004. "Competition and Costs: Evidence from Competitive Tendering in the Scottish National Health Service," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, February.
    6. S J Bailey & C Davidson, 1999. "The Purchaser—Provider Split: Theory and UK Evidence," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(2), pages 161-175, April.
    7. Roxana Gutiérrez-Romero & Dirk Haubrich & Iain McLean, 2008. "The Limits of Performance Assessments of Public Bodies: External Constraints in English Local Government," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(4), pages 767-787, August.
    8. Koukiadaki, Aristea, 2012. "EU governance and social services of general interest: When even the UK is concerned," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:42:y:1995:i:4:p:409-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.